Journals / Avrasya Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3

Investigating the Consideration of Patient Preferences in Individualized Care in Acute Care Services

Akut Bakım Servislerinde Bireyselleştirilmiş Bakımda Hasta Tercihlerinin Dikkate Alınmasının Araştırılması

Gözde Özaras(ÇANKIRI KARATEKİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-9355-1324
Sevilay Ergün Arslanlı(ÇANKIRI KARATEKİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-1068-4202
Pages
220–232
Publication Date
2024-09-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, different levels of participation vary depending on patients’ aims, emotional states, wishes, and demands of participating in care, healing processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to investigate the consideration of patient preferences in individualized care in acute care services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants were 29 nurses working in the surgery, chest diseases, internal, neurology, obstetrics and orthopaedics wards of a public hospital and purposive sampling method was used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, different levels of participation vary depending on patients’ aims, emotional states, wishes, and demands of participating in care, healing processes.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:bireyselleştirilmiş bakım · hemşirelik uygulamaları · bakım

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the consideration of patient preferences in individualized care in acute care services. Method: This is a qualitative study using the descriptive phenomenological approach. Participants were 29 nurses working in the surgery, chest diseases, internal, neurology, obstetrics and orthopaedics wards of a public hospital and purposive sampling method was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. This study was reported per the Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). Results: Three main themes emerged from the data. First, “establishing a positive therapeutic relationship in individualized care,” explained the consideration of patients’ emotional needs, determining their wishes and demands, and informing them. Second, “supporting the patient in participating in their individualized care,” explained that patients’ decisions regarding their care should be supported, they should be given responsibility for their care, and their daily habits should be maintained. Third, “barriers to participation in decisions in the practice of individualized care,” explained the barriers experienced in delivering health services, the excess workload, and the barriers arising from the sociocultural differences among patients. Conclusion: Nurses are highly willing and successful in involving patients in their care by respecting their preferences. Additionally, different levels of participation vary depending on patients’ aims, emotional states, wishes, and demands of participating in care, healing processes.

Özet

Amaç: Akut bakım servislerinde bireyselleştirilmiş bakımda hasta tercihlerinin dikkate alınmasının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Bu, betimleyici fenomenolojik yaklaşımın kullanıldığı nitel bir çalışmadır. Araştırmaya bir kamu hastanesinin cerrahi, göğüs hastalıkları, dahiliye, nöroloji, kadın doğum ve ortopedi servislerinde çalışan 29 hemşire katılmıştır ve amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Bu çalışma, nitel araştırmaların raporlanması için birleştirilmiş kriterlere (COREQ) göre raporlanmıştır. Bulgular: Verilerden üç ana tema ortaya çıktı. Birincisi, “bireyselleştirilmiş bakımda olumlu terapötik ilişki kurmak”, hastaların duygusal ihtiyaçlarının dikkate alınması, istek ve taleplerinin belirlenmesi ve bilgilendirilmesidir. İkincisi, “hastanın bireyselleştirilmiş bakımına katılımının desteklenmesi”, hastaların bakımına ilişkin kararlarının desteklenmesi, bakımlarının sorumluluğunun kendilerine verilmesi ve günlük alışkanlıklarının sürdürülmesi gerektiğini açıkladı. Üçüncüsü, “bireyselleştirilmiş bakımın uygulanmasında kararlara katılımın önündeki engeller”, sağlık hizmetlerinin sunumunda yaşanan engelleri, iş yükünün fazlalığını ve hastalar arasındaki sosyokültürel farklılıklardan kaynaklanan engelleri açıklamaktadır. Sonuç: Hemşireler, hastaların tercihlerine saygı duyarak hastaları bakımlarına dahil etme konusunda oldukça istekli ve başarılıdırlar. Ek olarak, farklı katılım düzeyleri hastaların amaçlarına, duygusal durumlarına, bakım ve iyileşme süreçlerine katılım istekleri ve taleplerine bağlı olarak değişmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özaras, G., Arslanlı, S. E. (2024). Investigating the Consideration of Patient Preferences in Individualized Care in Acute Care Services. Avrasya Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.53493/avrasyasbd.1515650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Alıcı CB, Koç Z. (2020). Quality of life and satisfaction affect individualized nursing care perceptions in intensive care. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 25 (2), 148- 59. https://doi. org/10.1080/13548506.2019.1654110
  2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health (ACSQH). (2017). National safety and quality health service standards. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards Erişim tarihi: 29.04.2023.
  3. Bahlman-van Ooijen W, van Belle E, Bank A, de Man-Van Ginkel J, Huisman-de Waal G, Heinen M. (2023). Nursing leadership to facilitate patient participation in fundamental care: An ethnographic qualitative study. J Adv Nurs, 79 (3): 1044– 1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15329
  4. Bukecik E, Terzioglu F. (2020) Individualized care: perceptions of gynecologic oncology patients and nurse. J Cancer Educ, 36: 811-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01708-2
  5. Danaci E, Koc Z. (2020). The association of job satisfaction and burnout with individualized care perceptions in nurses. Nurs Ethics, 27 (1): 301-15. https://doi. org/10.1177/0969733019836151
  6. Friese S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with Atlas-ti (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
  7. Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing Research, 17 (4): 364.
  8. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures toachieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
  9. Hertog RD, Niessen T. (2021). Taking into account patient preferences in personalised care: Blending types of nursing knowledge in evidence-based practice. J Clin Nurs, 30: 1904–1915. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15743
  10. Holloway I, Wheeler S. (2013). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare (3th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  11. International Council of Nursing (ICN). (2018). Nurses: a voice to lead - health is a human right. http://www.icn.ch/ publications/2018-nurses-a-voiceto-lead-health-is-a-human-right/ Erişim tarihi: 29.04.2023.
  12. HFS, Hung CC, Lee BO, Tsai SL, Moreno O. (2022). Patient participation in healthcare activities: Nurses' and patients' perspectives in Taiwan. Nurs Health Sci, 1–10. https://doi. org/10.1111/nhs.12911
  13. Kuosmanen L, Hupli M, Ahtiluoto S, Haavisto E. (2021). Patient participation in shared decision-making in palliative care – an integrative review. Clin Nurs, 30 (23-24): 3415–3428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15866
  14. Mackie BR, Marshall AP, Mitchell ML. (2021). Exploring family participation in patient care on acute care wards: A mixed-methods study. Int J Nurs Pract, 27, e12881. https://doi. org/10.1111/ijn.12881
  15. Nilsson M, From I, Lindwall L. (2019). The significance of patient participation in nursing care–a concept analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 33 (1): 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12609
  16. Özakgül AA, Acaroğlu R, Şendir M, Yalçın Atar N, Eskimez Z. (2022). Evaluating the individualized care perceptions of patients and nurses. JAREN, 8 (1): 20-28. http://dx.doi. org/10.55646/jaren.2022.55376
  17. Ozdemir NG. (2019). The development of nurses' individualized care perceptions and practices: Benner's novice to expert model perspective. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 12 (2): 1279–1285.
  18. Sandelowski M. (2010). What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in
  19. Nursing and Health, 33 (1): 77–84. https://doi. org/10.1002/ nur.20362
  20. Santis MD, Hervas C, Weinman A, Bosi G, Bottarelli V. (2019). Patient empowerment of people living with rare diseases. Its contribution to sustainable and resilient healthcare systems. Ann Ist Super Sanità, 55 (3): 283-291. DOI: 10.4415/ ANN_19_03_15
  21. Sharifi N, Adib-Hajbaghery M, Najafi M. (2019). Cultural competence in nursing: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 99, 103386. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103386
  22. Suhonen R, Stolt M, Papastavrou E. (2019). Theory, measurement, research and practice. In Individualized care. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89899-5
  23. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357. https://doi. org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  24. Tosun B, Dirgar E, Pehlivan K, Atay E, Yava A, Leyva-Moral JM. (2023). Examination of individualised care behaviours and ethnocentrism of nurses caring for refugees: A descriptive and exploratory study. J Clin Nurs, 32 (15-16): 5084-5092. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16769
  25. Tosunöz İ, Akbaş M, Öztunç G. (2021). Patients’ and nurses’ perspectives on “A good nurse”: A qualitative study. Lokman Hekim Journal, 11 (2): 319-330. https://doi.org/10.31020/ mutftd.868127