SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Animal Health Production and Hygiene / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Early Healing and Complications Following Prescrotal and Scrotal Castration in Dogs

Köpeklerde Preskrotal ve Skrotal Kastrasyon Sonrası Erken İyileşme ve Komplikasyonların Değerlendirilmesi

Zeynep Cengiz(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE)0000-0002-4020-9779
Eser Çakmakçı(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, VETERİNER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5784-6291
Rahime Yaygıngül(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE)0000-0001-7402-9031
Zeynep Bozkan Ünal(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE)0000-0003-4233-6496
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, while scrotal castration offers a clear advantage in operative time, the prescrotal approach is associated with more favourable early postoperative wound findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study compared the short-term (14-day) effects of prescrotal and scrotal castration techniques on postoperative wound outcomes and complications in dogs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sixty clinically healthy male dogs aged 1–3 years were randomly allocated to prescrotal (n=30) or scrotal (n=30) castration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, while scrotal castration offers a clear advantage in operative time, the prescrotal approach is associated with more favourable early postoperative wound findings.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kastrasyon · Köpek · Yara İyileşmesi

Abstract

This study compared the short-term (14-day) effects of prescrotal and scrotal castration techniques on postoperative wound outcomes and complications in dogs. Sixty clinically healthy male dogs aged 1–3 years were randomly allocated to prescrotal (n=30) or scrotal (n=30) castration. Operative time was recorded, and surgical sites were evaluated on postoperative days 3, 7, and 14 for oedema, exudation, and suture loss count (number of missing or loosened skin sutures relative to those placed at closure). The scrotal technique resulted in a significantly shorter operative time than the prescrotal technique (p<0.001). However, early postoperative inflammatory findings were more pronounced in the scrotal group, with higher oedema and exudation scores, particularly on days 3 and 7 (p<0.05). By postoperative day 14, complete clinical wound healing was observed in both groups. In conclusion, while scrotal castration offers a clear advantage in operative time, the prescrotal approach is associated with more favourable early postoperative wound findings. These results highlight the need to consider both operative efficiency and short-term wound outcomes when selecting a castration technique in dogs.

Özet

Bu çalışma, köpeklerde preskrotal ve skrotal kastrasyon tekniklerinin kısa dönem (14 gün) postoperatif yara iyileşmesi ve komplikasyon göstergeleri üzerindeki etkilerini karşılaştırmak amacıyla yürütüldü. Yaşları 1–3 yıl arasında değişen, klinik olarak sağlıklı 60 erkek köpek rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı (preskrotal n=30; skrotal n=30). Operasyon süresi kaydedildi ve cerrahi alan postoperatif 3., 7. ve 14. günlerde ödem, eksudasyon ve sütür kaybı (kapanışta yerleştirilen sütürlere göre kaybolan/gevşeyen sütür sayısı) açısından değerlendirildi. Skrotal teknik, preskrotal tekniğe kıyasla operasyon süresini anlamlı düzeyde kısalttı (p<0.001). Buna karşın, erken postoperatif dönemde (özellikle 3. ve 7. günlerde) ödem ve eksudasyon skorları skrotal grupta daha yüksekti (p<0.05). Postoperatif 14. günde her iki grupta da tam klinik yara iyileşmesi gözlendi. Sonuç olarak, skrotal yaklaşım cerrahi süre açısından avantaj sağlarken, preskrotal yaklaşım daha düşük erken dönem inflamatuvar bulgularla ilişkilidir. Bu bulgular, köpek kastrasyonunda teknik seçimi yapılırken cerrahi süre ile kısa dönem yara bulgularının birlikte değerlendirilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Cengiz, Z., Çakmakçı, E., Yaygıngül, R., Ünal, Z. B. (2026). Evaluation of Early Healing and Complications Following Prescrotal and Scrotal Castration in Dogs. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1. https://doi.org/10.53913/aduveterinary.1830389

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Adin, C.A. (2011). Complications of ovariohysterectomy and orchiectomy in companion animals. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 41(5), 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.05.004
  2. Alvarenga M.B., Francisco A.A., de Oliveira S.M., da Silva F.M., Shimoda G.T., Damiani L.P. (2015). Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 23(1):162-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3633.2538.
  3. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA). (2025). High-quality, high-volume spay/neuter surgical techniques. https://www.aspcapro.org/sites/default/files/hqhvsn_surgical_ techniques.pdf
  4. Brunn, A. (2022). Surgical castration in dogs: Does the incision approach influence postoperative recovery? Veterinary Evidence, 7(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v7i4.587
  5. Eze, C. A., Ugwu, N. E., Okpe, G. C., & Aguiyi, M. J. (2017). Evaluation of changes in wound assessment parameters associated with contralateral spermatic cord as ligature in open and closed pre-scrotal and scrotal castrations. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 26, 651–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-017-2435-1
  6. Feldman, E. C., Nelson, R. W., Reusch, C., & Scott-Moncrieff, J. C. (2014). Canine and feline endocrinology-e-book. Elsevier health sciences.
  7. Fossum, T.W. (Ed.). (2002). Small animal surgery (2nd ed.). Elsevier Mosby.
  8. Hamilton, K.H., Henderson, E.R., Toscano, M., & Chanoit, G.P. (2014). Comparison of postoperative complications in healthy dogs undergoing open and closed orchidectomy. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 55(10), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12266
  9. Honkavaara, J., & Ranki, J. S. (2025). Vatinoxan increases microcirculation in dogs anaesthetised with medetomidine-methadone-propofolisoflurane for prescrotal castration – A randomized, clinical study. The Veterinary Journal, 314, 106454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tvjl.2025.106454
  10. Howe, L.M. (2006). Surgical methods of contraception and sterilization. Theriogenology, 66(3), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.04.014
  11. Hunt, J. A., Heydenburg, M., Kelly, C. K., Anderson, S. L., & Dascanio, J. J. (2020). Development and validation of a canine castration model and rubric. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1117-158r1
  12. Kim, J.I., & Jeong, S.W. (2020). Evaluation of autoligation technique for castration in small breed dogs. Journal of Veterinary Clinics, 37(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.17555/jvc.2020.04.37.2.75
  13. Kreisler, R.E., Shaver, S.L., & Holmes, J.H. (2018). Outcomes of elective gonadectomy procedures performed on dogs and cats by veterinary students and shelter veterinarians in a shelter environment. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 253(10), 1294–1299. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.253.10.1294
  14. MacPhail, C. (2013). Surgery of the reproductive and genital systems. In T. W. Fossum (Ed.), Small Animal Surgery (4th ed., pp. 794–795). Elsevier Mosby.
  15. Marchegiani, A., Troisi, A., Bazzano, M., Spaterna, A., & Fruganti, A. (2024). A Prospective, Blinded, Open-Label Clinical Trial to Assess the Ability of Fluorescent Light Energy to Enhance Wound Healing after Mastectomy in Female Dogs. Animals, 14(8), 1250. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ani14081250
  16. Miller, K.P., Rekers, W.L., DeTar, L.G., Blanchette, J.M., & Milovancev, M. (2018). Evaluation of sutureless scrotal castration for pediatric and juvenile dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 253(12), 1589–1593. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.253.12.1589
  17. Pollari, F.L., Bonnett, B.N., Bamsey, S.C., Meek, A.H., & Allen, D.G. (1996). Postoperative complications of elective surgeries in dogs and cats determined by examining electronic and paper medical records. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 208(11), 1882–1886. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1996.208.11.1882
  18. Romagnoli, S., Krekeler, N., de Cramer, K., Kutzler, M., McCarthy, R., & Schaefer-Somi, S. (2024). WSAVA guidelines for the control of reproduction in dogs and cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 65(7), 424–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13724
  19. Silva, E., Schumacher, J., & Passler, T. (2020). Castration of dogs using local anesthesia after sedating with xylazine and sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 478. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00478
  20. Van Goethem, B. (2016). Orchiectomy. In D. Griffon & A. Hamaide (Eds.), Complications in Small Animal Surgery (2nd ed., pp. 528– 532). Wiley.
  21. Yiapanis, C., Ober, C., Psyllaki, M., Attipa, C., Potamopoulou, M., Vasilakis, T., & Milram, J. (2024). Canine orchiectomy via scrotal approach using vessel-sealing device: prospective observational study of 200 cases. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 75(1), 6831-6838.
  22. Woodruff, K. A. (2013). Scrotal castration as a safe and effective means of male canine sterilization (Graduate thesis, Mississippi State University). Scholars Junction. https://scholarsjunction.msstate. edu/td/3870