SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical Dentistry and Research / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

FARKLI TAŞIYICILARIN PROROOT MTA’NIN PUSH-OUT BAĞLANMA DAYANIMINA ETKİSİ

THE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS MIXING VEHICLES ON PUSH OUT BOND STRENGTH OF PROROOT MTA

AYHAN EYMİRLİ
EMEL UZUNOĞLU ÖZYÜREK
MEHMET ÖZGÜR UYANIK
ZEYNEL EMRE NAGAŞ
Pages
74–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bulgular: Antiwashout jel, kalsiyum klorit ve propilen glikol gruplarının ortalama push-out değerleri birbirleriyle benzer bulunurken(p>0.05) kalan diğer gruplardan yüksek bulunmuştur(p<0.05) Sonuç: Visköz taşıyıcılar ProRoot MTA’nın push-out bağlanma dayanımını artırmaktadır.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı taşıyıcıların ProRoot MTA’nın push-out bağlanma dayanımına etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Gereç ve Yöntem: 1 mm kalınlığında 210 adet kesit taşıyıcılarına göre 7 gruba ayrılmıştır (n=30). 1.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bulgular: Antiwashout jel, kalsiyum klorit ve propilen glikol gruplarının ortalama push-out değerleri birbirleriyle benzer bulunurken(p>0.05) kalan diğer gruplardan yüksek bulunmuştur(p<0.05) Sonuç: Visköz taşıyıcılar ProRoot MTA’nın push-out bağlanma dayanımını artırmaktadır.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:210 adet
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı taşıyıcıların ProRoot MTA’nın push-out bağlanma dayanımına etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 1 mm kalınlığında 210 adet kesit taşıyıcılarına göre 7 gruba ayrılmıştır (n=30). 1. Grup(kontrol grubu): distile su, 2: 2% klorheksidin diglukonat; 3: articaine; 4: 5,25% sodyum hipoklorit; 5: propilen glikol; 6: antiwashout jel; ve 7: kalsiyum klorit. Her gruptaki test likidi ProRoot MTA ile karıştırıldı. Push-out bağlanma dayanımı testleri yapıldı ve elde edilen veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve post-hoc Tukey testleri kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi(p=0.05). Bulgular: Antiwashout jel, kalsiyum klorit ve propilen glikol gruplarının ortalama push-out değerleri birbirleriyle benzer bulunurken(p>0.05) kalan diğer gruplardan yüksek bulunmuştur(p<0.05) Sonuç: Visköz taşıyıcılar ProRoot MTA’nın push-out bağlanma dayanımını artırmaktadır.

Özet

Background and Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different mixing vehicles on the push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and ten 1-mm-thick root slices were randomly assigned into 7 groups with respect to the mixing vehicles (n=30/group): 1: (control group); distilled water, 2: 2% chlorhexidine digluconate; 3: articaine; 4: 5,25% sodium hypochlorite; 5: propylene glycol; 6: antiwashout gel; and 7: calcium chloride. In each group, test liquid was mixed with ProRoot MTA. Push-out bond strength test was performed and the data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc tests (p=0.05). Results: Mean push-out values of viscous mixing vehicles such as calcium chloride, antiwashout gel and propylene glycol groups were similar (p>0.05) and significantly greater from those of other groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Viscous mixing vehicles significantly increase the push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA.

🔖

Cite This Article

EYMİRLİ, A., ÖZYÜREK, E. U., UYANIK, M. Ö., NAGAŞ, Z. E. (2018). FARKLI TAŞIYICILARIN PROROOT MTA’NIN PUSH-OUT BAĞLANMA DAYANIMINA ETKİSİ. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 74–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/143884

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod 1993; 19: 541-544.
  2. Prati C, Gandolfi MG. Calcium silicate bioactive cements: Biological perspectives and clinical applications. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 351-370.
  3. Dawood AE, Parashos P, Wong RH, Reynolds EC, Manton DJ. Calcium silicate-based cements: composition, properties, and clinical applications. J Investig Clin Dent 2017; 8. doi: 10.1111/ jicd.12195. Mozayeni MA, Milani AS, Marvasti LA, Asgary S. Cytotoxicity of calcium enriched mixture cement compared with mineral trioxide aggregate and intermediate restorative material. Aust Endod J 2012; 38: 70-75.
  4. Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Shalan TA, Naghshbandi J, Simon JH, Rotstein I. MTA preparations from different origins may vary in their antimicrobial activity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: e85-88. Pistorius A, Willershausen B, Briseno Marroquin B. Effect of apical root-end filling materials on gingival fibroblasts. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 610-615.
  5. Fischer EJ, Arens DE, Miller CH. Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as compared with zinc-free amalgam, intermediate restorative material, and Super-EBA as a root-end filling material. J Endod 1998; 24: 176-179.
  6. Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR, McKendry DJ, Abedi HR, Miller DA, Kariyawasam SP. Histologic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling in monkeys. J Endod 1997; 23: 225-228.
  7. Yasuda Y, Kamaguchi A, Saito T. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a new resin-based endodontic sealer against endodontic pathogens. J Oral Sci 2008; 50: 309-313.
  8. Ber BS, Hatton JF, Stewart GP. Chemical modification of proroot mta to improve handling characteristics and decrease setting time. J Endod 2007; 33: 1231-1234.
  9. Gomes-Filho JE, Rodrigues G, Watanabe S, Estrada Bernabe PF, Lodi CS, Gomes AC, et al. Evaluation of the tissue reaction to fast endodontic cement (CER) and Angelus MTA. J Endod 2009; 35: 1377-1380.
  10. Karygianni L, Proksch S, Schneider S, Vach K, Hellwig E, Steinberg T, et al. The effects of various mixing solutions on the biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2016; 49: 561-573.
  11. Arruda RA, Cunha RS, Miguita KB, Silveira CF, De Martin AS, Pinheiro SL, et al. Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) combined with distilled water, chlorhexidine, and doxycycline. J Oral Sci 2012; 54: 233-239.
  12. Salem Milani A, Froughreyhani M, Charchi Aghdam S, Pournaghi