Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 39

Determinants of Bank Profitability after Transition to the Strong Economy Program in Turkey

Güçlü Ekonomiye Geçiş Programı Sonrası Türkiye’de Banka Kârlılığının Belirleyicileri

Pages
111–131
Publication Date
2019-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal significant policy implications for the banking sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Turkey, many important steps have been taken towards restructuring the banking sector within the framework of “Transition to the Strong Economy Program” which was put into practice after the economic crisis at the beginning of the 2000s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The positive effects of the program have begun to be seen from the mid-2000s however, there has been a decline in bank profitability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal significant policy implications for the banking sector.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Banka Kârlılığı · Panel Veri Modeli · Türkiye

Abstract

In Turkey, many important steps have been taken towards restructuring the banking sector within the framework of “Transition to the Strong Economy Program” which was put into practice after the economic crisis at the beginning of the 2000s. The positive effects of the program have begun to be seen from the mid-2000s however, there has been a decline in bank profitability. This study takes into consideration the heterogeneity in terms of bank profitability and separate the sector into two groups as low and high profitable banks. In this context, utilizing the panel GMM estimation methods the effects of bank-specific, sector-specific and macroeconomic variables on bank profitability in Turkey were analyzed during the period 2006-2016. The findings reveal significant policy implications for the banking sector.

Özet

Türkiye’de 2000’li yılların başında yaşanan ekonomik krizler sonrasında uygulamaya konulan Güçlü Ekonomiye Geçiş Programı çerçevesinde bankacılık sektörünün yeniden yapılandırılmasına yönelik adımlar 2000’li yılların ortalarından itibaren kendini göstermeye başlamış ancak sektörün gelişimiyle banka kârlılıklarında azalmalar da meydana gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada sektörün kârlılıklar açısından heterojen bir yapıda olduğu göz önüne alınmış ve sektör düşük kârlı ve yüksek kârlı bankalar şeklinde iki gruba ayrılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu kapsamda 2006-2016 döneminde Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren bankaların kârlılıklarına bankaya özgü, sektöre özgü ve makroekonomik değişkenlerin etkileri panel GMM tahmini yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Uygulama sonuçları bankacılık sektörü açısından önemli politika çıkarsınımları ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTÇİ, C., DURUSU-ÇİFTÇİ, D. (2019). Determinants of Bank Profitability after Transition to the Strong Economy Program in Turkey. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 39, 111–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/139824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abbasoğlu, O. F., Aysan, A. F. & A. Güneş (2007), “Concentration, Competition, Efficiency and Profitability of the Turkish Banking Sector in the Post-Crises Period”, MPRA Paper, 5494. Ahamed, M. M. (2017), “Asset Quality, Non-interest Income, and Bank Profitability: Evidence from Indian Banks”, Economic Modelling, 63, 1-14.
  2. Alper, D. & A. Anbar (2011), “Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Turkey”, Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(2), 139-152.
  3. Arellano, M. & S.R. Bond (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
  4. Arellano, M. & O. Bover (1995), “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Component Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.
  5. Assaf, A. G., Matousek, R., & E. G. Tsionas (2013), “Turkish bank efficiency: Bayesian estimation with undesirable outputs”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 506-517.
  6. Atasoy, H. (2007), “Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Gelir-Gider Analizi ve Kârlılık Performansının Belirleyicileri”, Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası Bankacılık ve Finansal Kuruluşlar Genel Müdürlüğü Uzmanlık Yeterlilik Tezi, Mart 2007,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Athanasoglou P., Delis, M., &, C. Staikouras (2006), “Determinants of Banking Profitability in the South Eastern European Region”, Bank of Greece Working Paper, 06/47. Athanasoglou, P.P., Brissimis, S. N., & M. D. Delis (2008), “Bank-Specific, Industry Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18, 121–136.
  9. Aysan, A.F. & S.P. Ceyhan (2008), “What Determines The Banking Sector Performance in Globalized Financial Markets? The Case of Turkey”, Physica A, 387(7), 1593-1602.
  10. Baltagi, B.H. (2001), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 2. Baskı. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. Ben Naceur, S. & M. Goaied (2008), “The Determinants of Commercial Bank Interest Margin and Profitability: Evidence from Tunisia”, Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 5(1), 106-130.
  11. Berger, A. N., & R. DeYoung (1995), “Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency”, E&PA Working Paper, 95-5, December 1995.
  12. Berger, A. N., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Levine, R. & J. G. Haubrich (2004), “Bank Concentration and Competition: An Evolution in the Making”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36 (3), 433-451. Bordeleau, É. & C.