SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 40

Minskian Financial Instability Hypothesis and Its Post Keynesian Roots: A Theoretical Approach

Ömer Tuğsal DORUK
Yusuf Can ŞAHİNTÜRK
Pages
105–118
Publication Date
2019-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it is seen that FIH is a business cycle analysis within Post Keynesian framework, the theoretical underpinnings of the Post Keynesian macroeconomic analysis are put in the forefront for understanding business cycles in Minsky’s analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis (FIH) has the main assumptions of the Post Keynesian macroeconomics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main assumptions of the FIH and its Post Keynesian roots are discussed in this paper in a detailed way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it is seen that FIH is a business cycle analysis within Post Keynesian framework, the theoretical underpinnings of the Post Keynesian macroeconomic analysis are put in the forefront for understanding business cycles in Minsky’s analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Finansal İstikrarsızlık Hipotezi · Post Keynesyen İktisat · İş Çevrimleri

Abstract

Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis (FIH) has the main assumptions of the Post Keynesian macroeconomics. The main assumptions of the FIH and its Post Keynesian roots are discussed in this paper in a detailed way. Thus, it is seen that FIH is a business cycle analysis within Post Keynesian framework, the theoretical underpinnings of the Post Keynesian macroeconomic analysis are put in the forefront for understanding business cycles in Minsky’s analysis.

Özet

Minsky’e ait Finansal İstikrarsızlık Hipotezi (FİH), metodolojik olarak Post Keynesyen makro iktisadın ana varsayımlarını taşımaktadır. FİH’in temelinde yatan ana varsayımlar ve FİH’in Post Keynesyen kökenleri bu çalışmada etraflıca tartışılmaktadır. Dolayısıyla FİH’in Post Keynesyen çerçevede bir iş çevrimi analizi olduğu görülürken, özellikle Post Keynesyen makro iktisadi analizin temelinde yer alan varsayımların Minsky’nin analizinde iş çevrimlerinin anlaşılması açısından ön plana çıktığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DORUK, Ö. T., ŞAHİNTÜRK, Y. C. (2019). Minskian Financial Instability Hypothesis and Its Post Keynesian Roots: A Theoretical Approach. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 40, 105–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/139464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Arestis, P. & M. Glickman (2002), “Financial Crisis in Southeast Asia: Dispelling Illusion the Minskyan Way”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(2), 237-260.
  2. Basu, D. & D. Das (2017), “Profitability and Investment: Evidence from Indıa’s Organized Manufacturing Sector”, Metroeconomica, 68(1), 47-90.
  3. Charles, S. (2008), “Teaching Minsky Instability Hypothesis: A Manageable Suggestion”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 31(1), 125-138.
  4. Cin, M.F. (2017), “Post-Keynezyen İktisatta Açık Sistem Ontolojisi: Sheila C. Dow’un Babylonian Düşünce Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(2), 151-166.
  5. Davidson, P. (1998), “Post Keynesian Employment Analysis and the Macroeconomics of OECD Unemployment”, The Economic Journal, 108(448), 817-831.
  6. Doruk, Ö.T. (2011), “Post Keynezyen İktisadi Birey ve Post Keynezyen İktisat Metodolojisinde Krizlerin Dinamikleri Üzerine Yazınsal Bir İnceleme:1929 ve 2008 Krizi Karşılaştırması”, içinde: İ. Şiriner vd. (eds.), Politik İktisat, Kriz ve Kalkınma, Londra: IJOPEC Publications. Jespersen, J. (2009), Macroeconomic Methodology: A Post Keynesian Perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Hubbard, T.P. & Y. Sağlam (2006),
  7. Stochastic Processes, Itô Calculus, and Applications in Economics,, 20.12.2018. Kalečki, M. (1937), “The Principle of Increasing Risk”, Economica, 4, 440-447. Kalečki, M. (1954),
  8. Theory of Economic Dynamics, London: Allen and Unwin. Keen, S. (2015), “Post Keynesian Theories of Crisis”, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 74(2), 298-324.
  9. Keen, S. (1995), “Finance and Economic Breakdown: Modeling Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 17(4), 607-635.
  10. Keynes, J.M. (1921),
  11. A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan. Keynes, J.M. (1936),
  12. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan. Kyland, F.E. & E. Prescott (1982), “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations”, Econometrica, 50(6), 1345- 1370. Lavoie, M. (1997), “Loanable Funds, Endogenous Money and Minsky’s Financial Fragility Hypothesis”, in: A.J. Cohen & H. Hagemann & J. Smithin (eds.), Money, Financial Institutions, and Macroeconomics, Boston: Kluwer Academic, 67-82.
  13. Leao, P. (2016), A Post-Keynesian Model of the Business Cycle,, 19.12.2018.
  14. Lucas Jr., Robert E. & E.C. Prescott (1971), “Investment Under Uncertainty”, Econometrica, 39(5), 659-681.
  15. Mankiw, G.N. (1990), “A Quick Refresher Course in Macroeconomics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 164