SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3

Market Failures In Economic Schools and Financial Crisis Approach: A Post Keynesian Analysis On The 2001 Financial Crisis In Turkey

İktisat Okullarında Piyasa Başarısızlıkları Ve Finansal Kriz Yaklaşımı: Türkiye’de 2001 Finansal Krizi Üzerine Post Keynesyen Bir Analiz

Ömer Tuğsal Doruk(KIBRIS AMERİKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2382-1042
Pages
95–105
Publication Date
2019-06-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Generally, the Post Keynesian economic thought has a more comprehensive and alternative approach for the 2001 financial crisis in the Turkish economy and described the main reasons for this crisis in a better way.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Financial crisis approach in the macroeconomic analysis is based on the different assumptions of economic thought schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, the financial crisis approach is investigated for the 2001 financial crisis, which is one of the most severe financial crises the Turkish economy experienced, in the Post Keynesian economic thought framework in a comparative way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Generally, the Post Keynesian economic thought has a more comprehensive and alternative approach for the 2001 financial crisis in the Turkish economy and described the main reasons for this crisis in a better way.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Finansal Kriz · Piyasa Başarısızlıkları · Karşılaştırmalı Finansal Kriz Analizi

Abstract

Financial crisis approach in the macroeconomic analysis is based on the different assumptions of economic thought schools. In this paper, the financial crisis approach is investigated for the 2001 financial crisis, which is one of the most severe financial crises the Turkish economy experienced, in the Post Keynesian economic thought framework in a comparative way. Generally, the Post Keynesian economic thought has a more comprehensive and alternative approach for the 2001 financial crisis in the Turkish economy and described the main reasons for this crisis in a better way.

Özet

Finansal kriz yaklaşımı, makro iktisadi analizde iktisat okulları tarafından farklı varsayımlara dayanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada finansal kriz yaklaşımı, Post Keynesyen iktisat okulu çerçevesinde Türkiye ekonomisinde yaşanan en ağır finansal krizlerden birisi olan 2001 finansal krizi açısından karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmektedir. Genel itibariyle Post Keynesyen iktisat okulunun Türkiye ekonomisinde 2001 finansal krizini açıklamada alternatif bir yaklaşıma sahip olduğu ve krizin ana nedenlerini daha iyi açıkladığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Doruk, Ö. T. (2019). Market Failures In Economic Schools and Financial Crisis Approach: A Post Keynesian Analysis On The 2001 Financial Crisis In Turkey. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.462995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Allsopp, V. (2002). Trust, Time and Uncertainty. İçinde: S.C. Dow & J. Hillard (Ed.) Post Keynesian Econometrics, Microeconomics and the Theory of the Firm (s.81-96), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  2. Asensio, A. (2013). The Achilles' Heel Of The Mainstream Explanations of the Crisis and a Post Keynesian Alternative. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 36 (2), 355-380.
  3. Bry, G. & Boschan, C. (1971).Cyclical Analysis of Time Series: Selected Procedures and Computer Programs. NBER: New York.
  4. Crotty, J. (2009).Structural Causes of the Global Financial Crisis: A Critical Assessment of the ‘New Financial Architecture’.Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33 (4), 563–580.
  5. Christiano, L.J; Eichenbaum, M.S. ve Trabandt, M. (2018). On DSGE Models. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32 (3), 113-140.
  6. Davidson, P. (1972).Money and the Real World, London: Macmillan.
  7. Davidson, P. (2002). Financial Markets, Money and the Real World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  8. Davidson, P. (2007). John Maynard Keynes. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.
  9. Doruk, Ö. T. (2011).Post Keynezyen İktisadi Birey ve Post Keynezyen İktisat Metodolojisinde Krizlerin Dinamikleri Üzerine Yazınsal Bir İnceleme: 1929 ve 2008 Krizi Karşılaştırması. İçinde:İ. Şiriner., F. Morady, J. Mika, M. Aydın, Ş.A., H. Kapucu, ve E. Doğan (Ed.) Politik İktisat, Kriz ve Kalkınma (s.87-106). Londra: IJOPEC Publication.
  10. Dow, S. (2008). Mainstream Methodology, Financial Markets, and Global Political Economy. Contributions to Political Economy, 27(1), 13–29.
  11. Dunn, S.P. (2002). A Post Keynesian Approach to the Theory of the Firm. İçinde: S.C. Dow & J. Hillard (Ed.) Post Keynesian Econometrics, Microeconomics and the Theory of the Firm (s.60-80), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  12. Galbraith, J.K.(1993).A Short History of Financial Euphoria. Houghton Mifflin:Boston.
  13. Gezici, A. (2007). Investment under Financial Liberalization: Channels of Liquidity and Uncertainty. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  14. Gorton, G. (2010). E-coli, Repo Madness, and the Financial Crisis.Business Economics,45(3), 164-173.
  15. Hung, F.-S.& Lee, C.-C. (2010).Asymmetric Information, Government Fiscal Policies, And Financial Development.Economic Development Quarterly, 24(1), 60-73
  16. Jespersen, J. (2009). Macroeconomic Methodology A Post-Keynesian Perspective. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham
  17. Johnson, L.E; Ley,R., & Cate, T. (2001).Keynes' Theory of Money and His Attack on the Classical Model. International Advances in Economic Research, 7 (4), 409- 418.
  18. Keen, S. (2013). Predicting the ‘Global Financial Crisis’: Post‐Keynesian Macroeconomics. Economic Record, 89(285), 228-254.
  19. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Money, Interest and Employment. London: Macmillan
  20. Lavoie, M. (2016). Understanding the Global Financial Crisis: Contributions of Post-Keynesian Economics.Studies in Political Economy, 97, 58-75.
  21. Minsky, H. P.(1992).The Financial Instability Hypothesis. Levy Institute Çalışma Tebliği no. 74.
  22. Mishkin,F. S.(1996). Understanding Financial Crises: A Developing Country Perspective. NBER Çalışma Tebliği no.5600
  23. Modigliani, F. & Miller, M. H. (1958).The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment.The American Economic Review, 48 (3), 261-297.
  24. Palley, T.I. (1993). Uncertainty, Expectations, and the Future: If We Don't Know the Answers, What Are the Questions? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 16(1),3-18.
  25. Romer, D. (1993). The New Keynesian Synthesis.The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (1), 5-22
  26. Stiglitz, J. (2010). Risk and Global Economic Architecture: Why Full Financial Integration may be Undesirable. NBER Çalışma Tebliği no. 15718.
  27. Stiglitz, J. (2017). Where Modern Macroeconomics Went Wrong. (Erişim: 08.11.2018) https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/Where-Modern-Macroeconomics-Went-Wrong.pdf
  28. Wecker, W. (1979). Predicting the Turning Points of a Time Series.Journal of Business, 52, 35-50.
  29. Wolfson, M. H. (1996). A Post Keynesian Theory of Credit Rationing.Journal of Post Keynesian Economics,18(3),443-470.
  30. Doruk, Ö. T. (2011).Post Keynezyen İktisadi Birey ve Post Keynezyen İktisat Metodolojisinde Krizlerin Dinamikleri Üzerine Yazınsal Bir İnceleme: 1929 ve 2008 Krizi Karşılaştırması. İçinde:İ. Şiriner., F. Morady, J. Mika, M. Aydın, Ş.A., H. Kapucu, ve E. Doğan (Ed.) Politik İktisat, Kriz ve Kalkınma (s.87-106). Londra: IJOPEC Publication.
  31. Mishkin,F. S.(1996). Understanding Financial Crises: A Developing Country Perspective. NBER Çalışma Tebliği no.5600