Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 48

Causality Relationships Between Per Capita Income and Research and Development (R&D) Expenditures in Asian Tigers, China, and Turkey

Asya Kaplanları, Çin ve Türkiye’de Kişi Başına Düşen Gelir ile Araştırma ve Geliştirme (Ar-Ge) Harcamaları Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkileri

Pages
11–30
Publication Date
2021-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The coefficients of these causality relationships are positive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the relationship between R & D expenditures and per capita income for Asian Tigers (Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore), China, and Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the relationships between variables are investigated using the bootstrap panel causality test developed by Konya (2006).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The coefficients of these causality relationships are positive.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ar-Ge Harcamaları · Ekonomik Büyüme · Kişi Başına Düşen Gelir

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between R & D expenditures and per capita income for Asian Tigers (Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore), China, and Turkey. For this purpose, the relationships between variables are investigated using the bootstrap panel causality test developed by Konya (2006). In the study, analyses are made by using data for the period 1998-2016. According to the analysis results, there is a unidirectional causality relationship from R&D expenditures to per capita income in Hong Kong and Korea. On the other hand, there is a unidirectional causality relationship from per capita income to R&D expenditures in China and Turkey. The coefficients of these causality relationships are positive.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Asya Kaplanları, (Hong Kong, Güney Kore, Singapur), Çin ve Türkiye için Ar-Ge harcamaları ile kişi başına düşen gelir arasındaki ilişkilerin araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler Konya (2006) tarafından geliştirilen bootstrap panel nedensellik testi kullanılarak araştırılmaktadır. Çalışmada 1998-2016 dönemi verileri kullanılarak analizler yapılmaktadır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre Hong Kong ve Güney Kore’de Ar-Ge harcamalarından kişi başına düşen gelire doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi vardır. Öte yandan, Çin ve Türkiye’de ise kişi başına düşen gelirden Ar-Ge harcamalarına doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi vardır. Son olarak, bu nedensellik ilişkilerinin katsayıları ise pozitiftir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRCA, M., CANBAY, Ş., İNAL, V., GENÇ, S. Y. (2021). Causality Relationships Between Per Capita Income and Research and Development (R&D) Expenditures in Asian Tigers, China, and Turkey. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 48, 11–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/139261

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aghion, P. & P. Howitt (1992), “Model of Growth Through Creative Destructio”, Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351.
  2. Aghion, P. & P. Howitt (1998),
  3. Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT press. Akinci, M. & H. Sevinç (2013), “The Relationship between R&D Expenditures and Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey, 1990-2011”, The Journal of International Social Research, 6(27), 7-17.
  4. Altin, O. & A. Kaya (2009), “Analysis of The Casual Relationship between R&D Expenditures and Economic Growth for Turkey”, Ege Academic Review, 9(1), 251-259.
  5. Arrow, K.J. (1962), “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.
  6. Baltagi, B.H. & Q. Feng & C. Kao (2012), “A Lagrange Multiplier Test for Cross-Sectional Dependence in a Fixed Effects Panel Data Model”, Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 164-77.
  7. Barro, R.J. & X. Sala-i Martin (2004),
  8. Economic Growth, The MIT Press,
  9. ABD. Bond, S.R. & I. Guceri (2017), “R&D and Productivity: Evidence from Large UK Establishments with Substantial R&D Activities”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 26, 108-20.
  10. Bozkurt, C. (2015), “R&D Expenditures and Economic Growth Relationship in Turkey”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 188-198.
  11. Bravo-Ortega, C. & Á.G. Marín (2011), “R&D and Productivity: A Two Way Avenue?”, World Development, 39(7), 1090-1107.
  12. Breusch, T.S. & A.R. Pagan (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  13. Dam, M.M. & B. Yildiz (2016), “Impact of R&D and Innovation on Economic Growth at BRICS-TM Countries: An Econometric Analysis”, Akdeniz University Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 16(33), 220-236.
  14. Dereli, D.D. & U. Salgar (2019), “Relationship between R&D Expenditures and Economic Growth: An Evaluation on Turkey”, Journal of Life Economics, 6(3), 345-360.
  15. Domar, E.D. (1946), “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment”, Econometrica Journal of the Econometric Society, 137-147.
  16. Duman, K. & K. Aydin (2018), “The Relationship between R&D Expenditure and GDP in Turkey”, Gazi Journal of Economic & Business, 4(1), 49-66.
  17. Eaton, J. & S. Kortum (2006), “Innovation, Diffusion, and Trade”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No: 12385. Feng, P. & S. Ke (2016), “Self-selection and Performance of R&D Input of Heterogeneous Firms: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Industries”, China Economic Review, 41, 181-95.
  18. Freeman, C. & L. Soete (2