Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 0

ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN TURKEY'S CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP (CDS)

TÜRKİYE KREDİ RİSK PRİMİNDEKİ (CDS) YAPISAL KIRILMALARIN EKONOMETRİK ANALİZİ

Pages
181–191
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It seems that the economic and political events that took place on these dates were influential in the structural breaks on the CDS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Credit default swap (CDS) is defined as a credit derivative instrument that protects the creditor against a non-repayment risk of a financial loan.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, unit root test with multiple structural breaks is used to determine the structural break dates, using monthly-CDS data from January 2012 to December 2016 that based on 5-year CDS base points.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It seems that the economic and political events that took place on these dates were influential in the structural breaks on the CDS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kredi Risk Primi · Yapısal Kırılma · Birim Kök Testi

Abstract

Credit default swap (CDS) is defined as a credit derivative instrument that protects the creditor against a non-repayment risk of a financial loan. CDS provides important information to investors about the credibility of countries, as well as being a risk indicator closely followed by market participants as it shows the credit risk concurrently. The purpose of this study is to determine the structural breaks in the CDS for Turkey and the economic and political reasons behind them. For this purpose, unit root test with multiple structural breaks is used to determine the structural break dates, using monthly-CDS data from January 2012 to December 2016 that based on 5-year CDS base points. According to the test results, significant structural breaks are found at the credit risk premium for Turkey in April 2013, September 2014, June 2015 and finally in February 2016. It seems that the economic and political events that took place on these dates were influential in the structural breaks on the CDS.

Özet

Kredi risk primi (CDS) finansal bir kredinin geri ödenmeme riskine karşı, belirli bir tutar karşılığında alacaklı tarafı koruma altına alan kredi türev enstrümanı şeklinde tanımlanmaktadır. CDS’ler kredi riskini eş anlı olarak göstermesi bakımından piyasa katılımcıları tarafından yakından takip edilen bir risk göstergesi olmakla birlikte, yatırımcılara da ülkelerin kredibilitesi hakkında önemli bilgiler sunar. Türkiye için hesaplanan CDS’lerde meydana gelen yapısal kırılmaların ve bu kırılmaların arkasında yatan ekonomik ve siyasi nedenlerin belirlenmesi bu çalışmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Bu amaca yönelik olarak çalışmada, Ocak 2012 ile Aralık 2016 tarihlerini kapsayan ve 5 yıllık CDS baz puanına göre belirlen aylık CDS verilerinde yaşanan kırılmalar, çok kırılmalı birim kök testi yardımıyla belirlenmiştir. Testin sonuçlarına göre Türkiye’ye ait kredi risk priminde Nisan 2013, Eylül 2014, Haziran 2015 ve son olarak Şubat 2016’da anlamlı yapısal kırılmaların olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu tarihlerde yaşanan ekonomik ve siyasal olayların CDS üzerinde meydana gelen kırılmalarda etkili olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNÇ, M., YILDIZ, Ü., KIRCA, M. (2018). ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN TURKEY'S CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP (CDS). Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 181–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/322453

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abid, Fathi. ve Naifar, Nader (2006). “The Determinants of Credit Default Swap Rates: An Explana-tory Study”. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 9(1): 23-42.
  2. Afonso, Antonio (2003). “Understanding the Determinants of Sovereign Debt Ratings: Evidence for the Two Leading Agencies”. Journal of Economics and Finance, 27(1): 56-74.
  3. Afonso, Gomes vd. (2007). “What Hides Behind Sovereign Debt Ratings?”, European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No:711 Akbulut, Seval ve Terzi, Harun (2013), "Türkiye'de İhracata Dayalı Büyümenin Sektörler İtibariyle Analizi", Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3:43-58
  4. Baek, Arindam vd. (2005). “Determinants of Market-Assessed Sovereign Risk: Economic funda-mentals or market risk appetite?” Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(4), 533-548.
  5. Bai, Jushan ve Pierre Perron (1998). “Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structu-ral Changes.” Econometrica 66, 47-78.
  6. Baltaci, Nuri ve Hikmet Akyol (2016). “Examination of the Macroeconomic Variables Affecting Cre-dit Default Swaps”. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 3(4), 610. Baum, Christopher F. ve Chi Wan (2010). “Macroeconomic Uncertainty nd Credit Default Swap Spreads”. Applied Financial Economics, 20(15), 1163-1171.
  7. Brandorf, Christopher ve Johan Holmberg (2010). Determinants Of Sovereign Credit Default Swap Spreads For PIIGS - A Macroeconomic Approach. Bachelor Thesis, Lund University School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics. Brewer, Thomas. L. ve Pietra Rivoli (1990). “Politics and Perceived Country Creditworthiness in International Banking”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 22(3), 357-369. Cantor Richard, ve Packer Frank (1996). “Determinants and Impact of Sovereign Credit Ratings”. Economic Policy Review 2 (2): 37– 53. Cosset, Jean-Claude. ve Jean Roy (1991). “The Determinants of Country Risk Ratings”. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 135-142.
  8. Ertugrul, Hasan Murat ve Hüseyin Öztürk (2013). “The Drivers of Credit Default Swap Prices: Evi-dence From Selected Emerging Market Countries”. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(sup5), 228-249.
  9. Eyssell, Fung vd. (2013). “Determinants and Price Discovery of China Sovereign Credit Default Swaps”. China Economic Review, 24, 1-15.
  10. Fabozzi, Cheng vd. (2007). “Exploring the Components of Credit Risk in Credit Default Swaps”. Fi-nance Research Letters, 4(1), 10-18.
  11. Finnerty, Miller vd. (2013). “The Impact of Credit Rating Announcements o