Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3

Dynamic Performance of Waste Astragalus gummifer Bark-Reinforced Polymer Composites: Effect of Resin and Filler Ratio

Atık Astragalus Gummifer Kabuğu Takviyeli Polimer Kompozitlerin Dinamik Performansı: Reçine ve Dolgu Oranının Etkisi

Yavuz Selim Tarih(BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BİNGÖL TEKNİK BİLİMLER MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-8267-7706
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that epoxy matrix should be preferred for structural applications requiring high stiffness, while polyester matrix is more suitable for designs requiring high vibration isolation and acoustic damping.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of resin type (epoxy and unsaturated polyester) and reinforcement ratio (40–70 wt%) on the dynamic behavior of waste Astragalus bark (Astragalus gummifer – AG)-reinforced polymer composites were experimentally investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:AGE (epoxy matrix) and AGP (polyester matrix) specimen groups, fabricated by mechanical mixing and curing under 25 bar pressure, were subjected to modal analysis using the free vibration method, and their natural frequency and damping characteristics were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that epoxy matrix should be preferred for structural applications requiring high stiffness, while polyester matrix is more suitable for designs requiring high vibration isolation and acoustic damping.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:1 specimen
⚙️Variables:Modal analiz · Sürdürülebilir kompozitler · Doymamış polyester

Abstract

In this study, the effects of resin type (epoxy and unsaturated polyester) and reinforcement ratio (40–70 wt%) on the dynamic behavior of waste Astragalus bark (Astragalus gummifer – AG)-reinforced polymer composites were experimentally investigated. AGE (epoxy matrix) and AGP (polyester matrix) specimen groups, fabricated by mechanical mixing and curing under 25 bar pressure, were subjected to modal analysis using the free vibration method, and their natural frequency and damping characteristics were determined. The findings demonstrate that epoxy-matrix systems exhibit higher stiffness, producing higher natural frequencies than the AGP group across all configurations; the highest frequency was recorded at 16.78 Hz in the AGE1 specimen containing 40 wt% AG. Increasing the reinforcement ratio systematically reduced the natural frequency in both groups by increasing system mass. In terms of damping capacity, the polyester matrix showed a distinct advantage over epoxy due to its viscoelastic character; the damping ratio of the AGP4 specimen containing 70 wt% AG (10.31%) was approximately 3.36 times that of its counterpart AGE4 specimen (3.07%). Increasing the AG reinforcement ratio triggered interfacial friction mechanisms, elevating the damping ratio in both matrix systems. The results indicate that epoxy matrix should be preferred for structural applications requiring high stiffness, while polyester matrix is more suitable for designs requiring high vibration isolation and acoustic damping. This study technically confirms that waste Astragalus bark can serve as a functional reinforcement phase in sustainable engineering material development, even in its raw, unprocessed form.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, atık geven kabuğu (Astragalus gummifer – AG) takviyeli polimer kompozitlerin dinamik davranışı üzerinde reçine türünün (epoksi ve doymamış polyester) ve takviye oranının (%40–70 kütlece) etkileri deneysel olarak incelenmiştir. Mekanik karıştırma ve 25 bar basınç altında kürleme yöntemiyle üretilen AGE (epoksi matris) ve AGP (polyester matris) grubu numuneler, serbest titreşim yöntemiyle modal analize tabi tutularak doğal frekans ve sönümleme karakteristikleri belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, epoksi matrisli sistemlerin daha yüksek rijitlik sergileyerek tüm konfigürasyonlarda AGP grubuna göre daha yüksek doğal frekans ürettiğini göstermektedir; en yüksek frekans, %40 AG içeren AGE1 numunesinde 16.78 Hz olarak kaydedilmiştir. Takviye oranının artırılması, sistem kütlesini artırarak her iki grupta da doğal frekansı sistematik olarak düşürmüştür. Sönümleme kapasitesi açısından polyester matris, viskoelastik karakteri nedeniyle epoksiye karşı belirgin bir üstünlük sağlamıştır; %70 AG içeren AGP4 numunesinin sönümleme oranı (%10.31), muadili AGE4 numunesinin (%3.07) yaklaşık 3.36 katı olarak ölçülmüştür. AG takviye oranının artması, arayüzey sürtünme mekanizmalarını tetikleyerek her iki matris sisteminde de sönümleme oranını yükseltmiştir. Sonuçlar, yüksek rijitlik gerektiren yapısal uygulamalar için epoksi matrisin, yüksek titreşim yalıtımı ve akustik sönümleme gerektiren tasarımlar için ise polyester matrisin tercih edilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma, atık geven kabuğunun ham haliyle dahi sürdürülebilir mühendislik malzemesi geliştirmede işlevsel bir takviye fazı olarak kullanılabileceğini teknik verilerle doğrulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tarih, Y. S. (2026). Dynamic Performance of Waste Astragalus gummifer Bark-Reinforced Polymer Composites: Effect of Resin and Filler Ratio. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3. https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1937318

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. V. Prasad, A. A. Vijayakumar, T. Jose, and S. C. George, "A Comprehensive Review of Sustainability in Natural-Fiber-Reinforced Polymers," Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1223, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16031223.
  2. S. Ghalme, M. Hayat, and M. Harne, "A Comprehensive Review of Natural Fibers: Bio-Based Constituents for Advancing Sustainable Materials Technology," Journal of Renewable Materials, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 273-295, 2024, doi: 10.32604/jrm.2024.056275.
  3. H. L. Boudjema, H. Bendaikha, and U. Maschke, "Green composites based on Atriplex halimus fibers and PLA matrix," Journal of Polymer Engineering, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 693-702, 2020, doi: 10.1515/polyeng-2020-0068.
  4. R. Krishnan, K. Muthusamy, M. S. S. Kumar, and S. Kadhiresan, "Development of novel sustainable biocomposite from polycaprolactone and Sesbania rostrata fiber," Polymer Composites, vol. 45, no. 16, pp. 15125-15139, 2024, doi: 10.1002/pc.28825.
  5. N. Moussaoui et al., "Extraction and Characterization of Fiber Treatment Inula viscosa Fibers as Potential Polymer Composite Reinforcement," Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 3779-3793, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10924-021-02147-w.
  6. P. V. Reddy, R. V. S. Reddy, J. L. Rao, D. M. Krishnudu, and P. R. Prasad, "An overview on natural fiber reinforced composites for structural and non-structural applications," Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 45, pp. 6210-6215, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.523. [7] S. Sravanthee, "A Review on the Performance of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polyester and Epoxy Matrices," International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology (IJRASET), vol. 12, pp. 2030-2042, 2024.
  7. N. Gayathri, V. K. Shanmuganathan, A. Joyson, M. Aakash, and A. G. Joseph, "Mechanical properties investigation on natural fiber reinforced epoxy polymer composite," Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 72, pp. 2574-2580, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.121.
  8. S. M. V. Kumar, R. Jeyakumar, M. Nallasivam, and C. Sasikumar, " Experimental investigation on free vibrational damping and drilling behavior of flax reinforced epoxy composites using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system, " Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, vol. 58, pp. 833-850, 2024, doi: 10.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2024.58.74.
  9. M. Bunea, "Damage Mechanisms and Mechanical Behavior of Epoxy Composites after Low Velocity Impact," in IntechOpen eBooks: IntechOpen, 2024.
  10. R. P. Singh, S. K. Nayak, S. Hegde, and N. H. Padmaraj, "Influence of fiber length and moisture content on sound and vibration characteristics of hemp/epoxy composites," Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 957-962, 2023.
  11. H. Li, A. Moudood, W. Hall, G. Francucci, and A. Öchsner, "On the Dynamic Performance of Flax Fiber Composite Beams Manufactured at Different Relative Humidity Levels," Journal of Natural Fibers, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 598-608, 2018, doi: 10.1080/15440478.2018.1507864.
  12. K. N. Keya, N. A. Kona, M. Razzak, and R. A. Khan, "The Comparative studies of mechanical and interfacial properties between jute and E-Glass fiber-reinforced unsaturated polyester resin based composites," Materials Engineering Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 98-105, 2019.
  13. G. Sathishkumar et al., "Experimental study on mechanical performance and microstructural characterization of optimized sisal fiber reinforced polyester composites," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-20177-5.
  14. S. Saravanasankar, G. Kalusuraman, and I. Siva, "Vibration Analysis on Luffa Fiber Reinforced Polyester composites," International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 562-564, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijitee.b1080.1292s219.
  15. M. K. A. Raj et al., "Study on the mechanical characteristics of a natural Fiber-based hybrid polymer composite," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45247-45247, 2025/11/24 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-29459-4.
  16. Y. S. Tarih, "Multifaceted Characterization of Astragalus gummifer (Gum Tragacanth) Natural Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Biocomposites: Mechanical, Dynamic, Thermal, and Acoustic Properties," Polymer Composites, vol. 47, no. S2, pp. S194-S212, 2026, doi: 10.1002/pc.70925.
  17. C. Karademir et al., "Development of Sustainable Polymer Composites Containing Waste Glass and Natural Fibers for Strengthening Purposes," Polymers, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1116, 2025, doi: 10.3390/polym17081116.
  18. G. D. Edinne, Y. Ramdane, N. Ouelaa, and N. Boutasseta, "Modal analysis of biocomposite materials beams reinforced by ‎Washingtonia Filifera natural fibers," Journal of Vibroengineering, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1502-1511, 2022, doi: 10.21595/jve.2022.22847.
  19. S. S. Rao, Vibration of continuous systems. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
  20. D. J. Inman and R. C. Singh, Engineering vibration. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
  21. N. Moussaoui et al., "Extraction and Characterization of Fiber Treatment Inula Viscosa Fibers as Potential Polymer Composite Reinforcement," Research Square (Research Square), 2021/02/24 2021, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-231207/v1.