Journals / İstatistik ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 13

Demographic Correlates of Work-Related Attitudes in Türkiye: An Exploratory Analysis Based on World Values Survey Wave

Türkiye'de İşe İlişkin Tutumların Demografik Değişkenlerle İlişkileri: Dünya Değerler Araştırması 7. Dalga Verilerine Dayalı Keşifsel Bir Analiz

Tutku Seçkin(İSTANBUL MEDENİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SİYASAL BİLGİLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8265-5259
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall pattern is one of considerable attitudinal uniformity, attributed to the deep cultural embeddedness of work as a moral obligation in Turkish society, reinforced by both Islamic tradition and secular-nationalist heritage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics relate to work-related attitudes among adults in Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Individual-level data were drawn from the Turkish national subsample of World Values Survey Wave 7.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall pattern is one of considerable attitudinal uniformity, attributed to the deep cultural embeddedness of work as a moral obligation in Turkish society, reinforced by both Islamic tradition and secular-nationalist heritage.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:iş değerleri · iş ahlakı · işin merkeziliği

Abstract

This study examines how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics relate to work-related attitudes among adults in Türkiye. Work-related attitudes encompass both normative beliefs about the social and moral value of labor (work ethic) and the degree to which work occupies a central place in life relative to other domains (work centrality). Given Türkiye’s distinctive combination of rapid modernization, Islamic cultural heritage, and collectivist social norms, and the relative scarcity of population-level empirical evidence on this topic, the study provides a preliminary descriptive account of attitudinal variation across standard demographic groups. Individual-level data were drawn from the Turkish national subsample of World Values Survey Wave 7. Three WVS items were combined into a composite Work Values Index. Independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc tests, and OLS multiple regression were employed. Gender was unrelated to work-related attitudes. Education showed a statistically significant but modest effect, with respondents holding no formal schooling endorsing traditional work values more strongly than those with secondary or tertiary education. The full regression model was significant, yet accounted for only a small fraction of variance; marital status was the sole significant predictor. The overall pattern is one of considerable attitudinal uniformity, attributed to the deep cultural embeddedness of work as a moral obligation in Turkish society, reinforced by both Islamic tradition and secular-nationalist heritage.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki yetişkinler arasında demografik ve sosyoekonomik özelliklerin işle ilgili tutumlarla nasıl ilişkili olduğunu incelemektedir. İşle ilgili tutumlar, hem emeğin sosyal ve ahlaki değeri hakkındaki normatif inançları (iş ahlakı) hem de işin diğer alanlara kıyasla yaşamda ne kadar merkezi bir yer tuttuğunu (işin merkezi konumu) kapsamaktadır. Türkiye’nin hızlı modernleşme, İslami kültürel miras ve kolektivist sosyal normların kendine özgü birleşimini göz önünde bulundurarak ve bu konuyla ilgili nüfus düzeyinde ampirik kanıtların nispeten kısıtlı olması nedeniyle, bu çalışma standart demografik gruplar arasında tutum farklılıklarına ilişkin öncü bir betimsel analiz sunmaktadır. Birey düzeyindeki veriler, Dünya Değerler Anketi’nin 7. Dalgasının Türkiye ulusal alt örnekleminden elde edilmiştir. Üç WVS maddesi birleştirilerek bileşik bir “Çalışma Değerleri Endeksi” oluşturulmuştur. Bağımsız örneklemler t-testleri, Tukey HSD post hoc testleri ile tek yönlü ANOVA ve OLS çoklu regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Cinsiyet, işle ilgili tutumlarla ilişkili bulunmamıştır. Eğitim düzeyi, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ancak mütevazı bir etki göstermiştir; resmi eğitim almamış katılımcılar, ortaöğretim veya yükseköğretim görmüş olanlara kıyasla geleneksel iş değerlerini daha güçlü bir şekilde benimsemiştir. Tam regresyon modeli anlamlı bulunmuş, ancak varyansın yalnızca küçük bir kısmını açıklamıştır; medeni durum, tek anlamlı öngörücü değişken olmuştur. Genel eğilim, Türk toplumunda işin ahlaki bir yükümlülük olarak derin kültürel kökleri olması ve hem İslam geleneği hem de seküler-milliyetçi miras tarafından pekiştirilmesi nedeniyle, tutumlarda kayda değer bir tekdüzelik göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Seçkin, T. (2026). Demographic Correlates of Work-Related Attitudes in Türkiye: An Exploratory Analysis Based on World Values Survey Wave. İstatistik ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 13. https://doi.org/10.52693/jsas.1910227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. MOW International Research Team, The Meaning of Working: An International View. London: Academic Press, 1987.
  2. B. D. Rosso, K. H. Dekas, and A. Wrzesniewski, "On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review," Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 30, pp. 91-127, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
  3. R. Inglehart and C. Welzel, Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  4. A. Sagie, D. Elizur, and M. Koslowsky, "Work values: A theoretical overview and a model of their effects," Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 17, no. S1, pp. 503-514, 1996. doi: 10.1002/job.4030170502
  5. M. Arslan, "The work ethic values of Protestant British, Catholic Irish and Muslim Turkish managers," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 321-339, 2001. doi: 10.1023/A:1010787528465
  6. Z. Aycan and S. Fikret-Pasa, "Career choices, job selection criteria, and leadership preferences in a transitional nation: The case of Turkey," Journal of Career Development, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 129-144, 2003. doi: 10.1177/089484530303000206
  7. S. Uygur, "The Islamic work ethic and the emergence of Turkish SME owner-managers," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 211-225, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0107-z
  8. S. A. Wasti, "Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Test of an integrated model in the Turkish context," International Journal of Intercultural Relations, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 525-550, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00032-9
  9. Z. Karakitapoglu-Aygun, M. Arslan, and S. Güney, "Work values of Turkish and American university students," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 205-223, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9413-5
  10. B. Ucanok and S. Karabati, "The effects of values, work centrality, and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviors: Evidence from Turkish SMEs," Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 89-129, 2014. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21174
  11. C. Haerpfer et al., Eds., World Values Survey: Round Seven - Country-Pooled Datafile Version 6.0. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat, 2024. doi: 10.14281/18241.24
  12. M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Scribner, 1958. (Original work published 1904-1905)
  13. A. Furnham, "The Protestant work ethic: A review of the psychological literature," European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 87-104, 1984. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420140108
  14. R. N. Kanungo, "Measurement of job and work involvement," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 341-349, 1982. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341
  15. H. B. Jones, "The Protestant ethic: Weber’s model and the empirical literature," Human Relations, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 757-778, 1997. doi: 10.1177/001872679705000701
  16. M. J. Miller, D. J. Woehr, and N. Hudspeth, "The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory," Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 451-489, 2002. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838
  17. R. Dubin, "Industrial worker’s worlds: A study of the ‘central life interests’ of industrial workers," Social Problems, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 131-142, 1956. doi: 10.2307/799133
  18. I. Harpaz and X. Fu, "The structure of the meaning of work: A relative stability amidst change," Human Relations, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 639-667, 2002. doi: 10.1177/0018726702556002
  19. I. M. Paullay, G. M. Alliger, and E. F. Stone-Romero, "Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 224-228, 1994. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.224
  20. M. Sharabi and I. Harpaz, "Improving employees’ work centrality improves organizational performance: Work events and work centrality relationships," Human Resource Development International, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 379-392, 2010. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2010.501963
  21. K. Hattrup, K. Mueller, and I. Joens, "The effects of nations and organizations on work value importance: A cross-cultural investigation," Applied Psychology: An International Review, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 479-499, 2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00297.x
  22. K. P. Parboteeah and J. B. Cullen, "Social institutions and work centrality: Explorations beyond national culture," Organization Science, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 137-148, 2003. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.2.137.14989
  23. R. Inglehart, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.
  24. R. Inglehart and P. R. Abramson, "Economic security and value change," American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 336-354, 1994. doi: 10.2307/2944708
  25. S. Kwon and P. Moen, "How did work attitudes change in reform-era China? Age, period, and cohort effects on work centrality," Sociological Perspectives, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 557-582, 2012. doi: 10.1525/sop.2012.55.4.557
  26. A. J. Ali, "Scaling an Islamic work ethic," The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 575-583, 1988. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1988.9922911
  27. A. J. Ali and A. Al-Owaihan, "Islamic work ethic: A critical review," Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5-19, 2008. doi: 10.1108/13527600810848791
  28. J. M. Twenge, S. M. Campbell, B. J. Hoffman, and C. E. Lance, "Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing," Journal of Management, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1117-1142, 2010. doi: 10.1177/0149206309352246
  29. G. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
  30. D. Elizur, I. Borg, R. Hunt, and I. M. Beck, "The structure of work values: A cross cultural comparison," Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21-38, 1991. doi: 10.1002/job.4030120103
  31. J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  32. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2010.
  33. N. Schmitt, "Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha," Psychological Assessment, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 350-353, 1996. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350
  34. A. Büyükgöze-Kavas and K. L. Autin, "Decent work in Turkey: Context, conceptualization, and assessment," Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 112, pp. 64-76, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.003
  35. R. A. Kalemci and I. Kalemci Tuzun, "Understanding Protestant and Islamic work ethic studies: A content analysis of articles," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 999-1008, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3758-3
  36. G. N. Efe and G. A. Yılmaz, "OECD ülkelerinde vergi takozunun kadın ve erkek istihdamına etkilerinin panel veri yöntemi ile analizi," Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 179-202, 2022.
  37. A. Keskin, "Türkiye’de kadına yönelik cinsel şiddeti etkileyen sosyoekonomik ve demografik faktörler," İstanbul İktisat Dergisi - Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 587-613, 2023. doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1267250
  38. A. Keskin and F. Karaman, "Barriers to formal help-seeking behavior by battered Turkish women according to sociodemographic factors," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 165, 2021. doi: 10.3390/su13010165