SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

A Study of Collective Action Threshold Model on Social Networks

Sosyal Ağlarda Kolektif Eylem Eşik Modeli Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Enes ABANOZ
Cem S. SÜTÇÜ
Pages
53–69
Publication Date
2018-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study results show that participants have high threshold value for political subjects where they are likely to face legal and social sanctions, while they have lower threshold value for subjects such as environmental and fundamental rights.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Collective action occurs when two or more individuals need to act jointly in order to reach a goal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The configuration of collective action has affected by the changes in social structure, globalization and digital networks that includes all aspects of daily life in.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study results show that participants have high threshold value for political subjects where they are likely to face legal and social sanctions, while they have lower threshold value for subjects such as environmental and fundamental rights.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: Kolektif Eylem · Çizge Teorisi · Eşik Değeri

Abstract

Collective action occurs when two or more individuals need to act jointly in order to reach a goal. The configuration of collective action has affected by the changes in social structure, globalization and digital networks that includes all aspects of daily life in. Collective action has become measurable by the structural characteristics of the network that it has taken place. Individuals take the decision to participate in a collective action at the different times of process. This psychological level, which varies according to individual, is defined as “threshold value”. The aim of this study is to determine the threshold value of collective action participants by using network structure properties. The study results show that participants have high threshold value for political subjects where they are likely to face legal and social sanctions, while they have lower threshold value for subjects such as environmental and fundamental rights.

Özet

Kolektif eylem; iki veya daha fazla bireyin bir amaca ulaşmak için, ortak hareket etme ihtiyacının bulunduğu anlarda ortaya çıkar. Toplumsal yapıdaki değişimler, küreselleşme ve dijital ağaların günlük yaşamın unsurlarını her geçen gün bünyesine katması, kolektif eylem yapısını değiştirmiştir. Kolektif eylem, üzerinde gerçekleştiği ağın yapısal özellikleri ile ölçülebilir hale gelmiştir. Bireyler; kolektif eyleme katılma kararını, eylemin farklı zamanlarında almaktadır. Bireye göre değişen bu psikolojik sınır “eşik değer” olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada; bireylerin kolektif eyleme katılma eşik değerlerinin ağ yapısı özellikleri kullanılarak belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda; bireylerin hukuki ve toplumsal yaptırımlar ile karşılaşma olasılıklarının olduğu politik konularda daha yüksek eşik değere sahip iken çevre ve temel haklar konularında düşük olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABANOZ, E., SÜTÇÜ, C. S. (2018). A Study of Collective Action Threshold Model on Social Networks. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 53–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/128778

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand. Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing. Bennett, P. W. L., ve Segerberg, D. A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., ve Stohl, C. (2012). Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Castells, M. (2003). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society (1. Baskı). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
  5. Castells, M. (2009a). Communication Power (2. Baskı). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  6. Castells, M. (2009b). The Rise of the Network Society (2. Baskı). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet Age (2. Baskı). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  7. Centola, D. (2010). The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment. Science, 329(5996), 1194–1197. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185231
  8. Centola, D. M. (2013).
  9. Homophily, Networks, ve Critical Mass: Solving the start-up Problem in Large Group Collective Action. Rationality and Society, 25(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463112473734
  10. Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  11. Cohen, J. L. (1985). Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements. Social Research, 52(4), 663–716.
  12. Consalvo, M., ve Ess, C. (2011). The Handbook of Internet Studies. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons. Csardi, G., ve Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695. Earl, J., ve Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. Easley, D., ve Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected World (1. Baskı). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Gane, N., ve Beer, D. (2008). New Media: The Key Concepts (1 edition). Oxford; New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Gonz