Journals / HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: Ek Sayı

FROM COMPASSION TO COERCION: INVERSION OF ANTINATALISM IN THE OFFSET

Cansu Özge Özmen(TEKİRDAĞ NAMIK KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7242-3884
Pages
321–331
Publication Date
2026-07-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

I will trace this misrepresentation to question whether it functions as a warning for when moral absolutism becomes weaponized under an authoritarian regime.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Offset (2021), cowritten by Emma Szewczak and Natasha Calder, is a work of cli-fi dystopia that is set on a near-future dying Earth where ecological collapse has led to a draconian offset ceremony to discourage procreation and control the population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The government operates through technocratic authoritarianism, and the setting exposes how moral absolutism and survivalism converge in a dystopian world.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:I will trace this misrepresentation to question whether it functions as a warning for when moral absolutism becomes weaponized under an authoritarian regime.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:iklim distopyası · distopya · antinatalizm

Abstract

The Offset (2021), cowritten by Emma Szewczak and Natasha Calder, is a work of cli-fi dystopia that is set on a near-future dying Earth where ecological collapse has led to a draconian offset ceremony to discourage procreation and control the population. In this world, every person, when they are of age, must “offset” the carbon cost of their existence by choosing one of their parents to be executed in an institutionalized ritual of ecological atonement. The government operates through technocratic authoritarianism, and the setting exposes how moral absolutism and survivalism converge in a dystopian world. Ethical decisions become data-driven, leaving no room for compassion and reproductive freedom. The novel engages with antinatalist philosophy, but it does so by inverting its moral core. Antinatalism, a philosophy that argues procreation is always wrong because of the inevitable suffering it exposes the potential offspring to, is transformed into a violent ideology that enforces death through state doctrine. We are presented with an authoritarian caricature of antinatalist philosophy, stripped of its compassionate grounds. The state in effect colonizes its subjects’ consent. The Offset uses a moral philosophy as a narrative metaphor, risking misrepresentation. I will trace this misrepresentation to question whether it functions as a warning for when moral absolutism becomes weaponized under an authoritarian regime.

Özet

Emma Szewczak ve Natasha Calder tarafından yazılan, 2021 yılında yayımlanan The Offset ekolojik çöküş sonucu insanları üremeden caydırmak için sert uygulamalara başvurulan yakın gelecekte geçen bir iklim distopyasıdır. Bu dünyada on sekiz yaşına gelen herkes kendi varlığının karbon varlığını dengelemek için bir ekolojik kefaret ritüeli çerçevesinde ebeveynlerinden birini idama göndermek zorundadır. Devlet, teknokratik ve otoriterdir. Mekanlar ahlâkî mutlakiyetçiliğin ve hayatta kalma arzusunun distopyalarda nasıl kesiştiğini gösterir. Etik kararlar veri temelli bir hale gelmiş, merhamet ve üreme özgürlüğüne yer kalmamıştır. Roman bir felsefî duruş olarak antinatalizmle ilişkilenir, ancak bunu, duruşun özünü tersine çevirerek yapar. Antinatalizm, dünyaya getirilecek kişinin kaçınılmaz olarak acı çekeceğini göz önünde bulundurarak üremenin ahlâkî açıdan her zaman yanlış olduğunu savunur. Romanda ise bu düşünce bir devlet doktrini haline gelmiştir. Devlet, hangi ebeveynin idam edileceği kararını da çocuğa bırakarak, vatandaşların rızasını da kontrol eder. The Offset ahlâkî bir duruşu metafor olarak kullanarak onu yanlış yorumlanmaya açık hale getirir. Bu çalışmada bu yanlış temsili izleyerek, ahlâkî mutlakiyetçiliğin otoriter rejimlerde nasıl kullanılabileceğini ve romanın bir uyarı işlevi görüp görmediğini tartışacağım.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özmen, C. Ö. (2026). FROM COMPASSION TO COERCION: INVERSION OF ANTINATALISM IN THE OFFSET. HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: Ek Sayı, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.1923038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Benatar, D. (2006). Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence. Oxford University Press.
  2. Booth, Wayne C. (1988). The company we keep: an ethics of fiction. University of California Press.
  3. Calder, N., & Szewczak, E. (2021). The offset. Angry Robot.
  4. Calder, N., & Szewczak, E. (2021). Why we co-wrote a novel: the offset by Calder Szewczak.
  5. Writing.ie, https://www.writing.ie/interviews/why-we-co-wrote-a-novel-the-offset-by-calder-szewczak/
  6. Chan, S. (2009). More than cautionary tales: the role of fiction in bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 398-399.
  7. Grimbeek, M. (2023). Say no to life: Reproductive futurism and antinatalist responses to environmental crisis in contemporary Britain. Journal for the Study of British Cultures, 30(2), 175–193.
  8. Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press.