Journals / Meyve Bilimi / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

-

Dut Sirkesi Oluşum Sürecinde İleri Analitik Tekniklerle Toplam Antioksidan Aktivitesi ve Fenolik Bileşenleri

Pages
27–31
Publication Date
2015-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Chlorogenic acid and gallic acid were the major phenolic components in mulberry vinegar

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Our country has more variety of fruit due to the ecological conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:White mulberry (Morus alba) can be grown in temperate, tropical and subtropical climate region owing to its high adaptability to different climatic and soil conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Chlorogenic acid and gallic acid were the major phenolic components in mulberry vinegar
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beyaz dut (Morus alba) · antioksidan aktivite · ORAC

Abstract

Our country has more variety of fruit due to the ecological conditions. White mulberry (Morus alba) can be grown in temperate, tropical and subtropical climate region owing to its high adaptability to different climatic and soil conditions. White mulberry (Morus alba) can be consumed fresh as well as jams, fruit pulp, berry butters, fruit ice cream, walnut sausage, fruit juice. This study has been target of the production of mulberry vinegar and determination of antioxidant properties and phenolic compounds in the fermentation production stage. Vinegar was made from season white mulberry fruit collected from Isparta. The sample was taken from mulberry juice, mulberry wine and mulberry vinegar in vinegar production stage. It was identified antioxidant activity by ORAC and TEAC assays; total phenolic substances by Folin–Ciocalteu assay; phenolic compounds by using HPLC. Titratable acidity, pH and Brix° of mulberry vinegar was 5.72%, 3.08; 3.10%, respectively. ORAC values was determined 17.01 mmol/mL, 18.04 mmol/mL, 19.06 mmol/mL in mulberry juice, wine, vinegar, respectively. TEAC value of mulberry vinegar was 7.72 mM while the value of total phenolic compound was 972.71 mg GAE/L. Chlorogenic acid and gallic acid were the major phenolic components in mulberry vinegar

Özet

Ülkemizin sahip olduğu ekolojik koşullar sayesinde meyve çeşitliliği fazladır. Farklı iklim ve toprak koşullarına adaptasyon yeteneğinin yüksek olması nedeniyle, ılıman, tropik ve subtropik iklim bölgelerinde yetişebilen beyaz dut (Morus alba) taze tüketiminin yanı sıra pekmez, reçel, pestil, dut ezmesi, meyveli dondurma, cevizli sucuk ve meyve suyu konsantresi gibi ürünlere de işlenmektedir. Dut meyvesinden sirke üretimi ve üretim aşamalarının antioksidan ve fenolik bileşen özelliklerinin belirlenmesi bu çalışmanın hedefi olmuştur. Isparta ilinden mevsiminde toplanan beyaz dut meyvesinden sirke üretilmiştir. Sirke üretim aşamalarındaki dut suyu, dut şarabı ve dut sirkesinden örnek alınmıştır. Örneklerde ORAC (Oksijen Radikal Absorbans Kapasitesi) ve TEAC (Troloks Eşdeğeri Antioksidan Kapasite) yöntemleri ile antioksidan aktiviteleri ve Folin–Ciocalteu yöntemi ile toplam fenolik bileşen ve HPLC kullanılarak fenolik bileşenler tespit edilmiştir. Dut sirkesinin titrasyon asitliği, pH ve briks değerleri sırasıyla %5.72, 3.08, %3.10 bulunmuştur. ORAC değerleri dut suyunda 17.01 µmol/ml; dut şarabında 18.04 µmol/ml ve dut sirkesinde 1.068 µmol/ml olarak tespit edilmiştir. Dut sirkesinin TEAC değeri 7.72 mM iken toplam fenolik madde değeri 972.708 mg GAE/L olarak bulunmuştur. Dut sirkesinde gallik ve klorojenik asit önemli fenolik bileşenlerdendir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BUDAK, N. (2015). -. Meyve Bilimi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 27–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/122565

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ames BN, Gold LS, Willett WC, 1995. The Causes and Prevention of Cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 5258-5265. AOAC, 1992. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Washington DC. Aslan MM, 1998.
  2. Malatya, Elazığ, Erzincan ve Tunceli Bölgesinden Ümitvar Dut Genotiplerinin Seleksiyonu. Çukurova Üniversitesi,
  3. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 69s, Adana. Bae SH, Suh HJ, 2007. Antioxidant Activities of Five Different Mulberry Cultivars in Korea. LWT-Food Science and Technology 40: 955-962. Budak HN, 2010. Elma ve Üzümden Üretilen Sirkelerin Bileşenleri ve Fonksiyonel Özellikleri Üzerine Araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi,
  4. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 190s, Isparta. Budak NH, 2015. Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Contents Pomegranate Vinegar. Agro FOOD Industry Hi Tech (in press). Budak NH, Doguc KD, Savaş ÇM, Seydim AC, Taş TK, Çiriş MI, Guzel-Seydim ZB, 2011. Effects of Apple Cider Vinegars Produced with Different Techniques on Blood Lipids in High-Cholesterol-Fed Rats. J Agr Food Chem. 59: 6638-6644.
  5. Butkhup L, Samappito S, 2008. Analysis of Anthocyanin, flavonoids and Phenolic Acids in Tropical Bignay Berries. International Journal of Fruit Science, 8: 15-34. Cam I, 2000. Edremit ve Gevaş Bölgelerinden Ümitvar Dut Genotiplerinin Seçilmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,
  6. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 53s, Van. Cemeroğlu B, 2007. Meyve ve Sebze İşleme Endüstrisinde Temel Analiz Metotları, Biltav Yayınları,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Conte A, Pellegrini S, Tagliazucchi D, 2003. Synergistic Protection of PC12 Cells from b-amyloid Toxicity by Resveratrol and Catechin. Brain Research Bulletin 62: 29-38.
  9. Crozier A, Jaganath IB, Clifford MN, 2009. Dietary Phenolics: Chemistry, Bioavailability and Effects on Health. Dietary Phenolics: Chemistry, Bioavailability and Effects on Health. Natural Product Reports 26 (8): 1001-1043.
  10. De Ory I, Romeo LE, Cantero D, 2002. Optimum Starting-up Protocol of a Pilot Plant Scale Acetifier for Vinegar Production. Journal of Food Enginering 52: 31-37.
  11. Ercişli S, Orhan E, 2007. Chemical Composition of White (Morus alba), Red (Morus rubra) and Black (Morus nigra) Mulberry Fruits. Food Chemistry 103: 1380-1384.
  12. Ercisli S, Tosun M, Duralija B, Voca S, Sengul M, Turan M, 2010. Phytochemical Content of Some Black (Morus nigra L.) and Purple (Morus rubra L.) Mulberry Genotypes. Food Technology and Biotechnology 48 (1): 102-106.
  13. Hojjatpanah G, Fazaeli M, Emam-Djomeh Z, 20