Journals / Meyve Bilimi / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

Biochemical Contents of Mulberry (Morus spp.) Genotype Collected from Different Locations

Farklı Lokasyonlardan Toplanan Dut (Morus spp.) Genotiplerinin Biyokimyasal İçerikleri

Civan Çelik(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1696-5902
Ayşe Vildan Pepe(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-4565-8602
Pages
75–79
Publication Date
2026-07-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that the biochemical composition of mulberry fruits is influenced not only by genetic factors but also by cultivation conditions and ecological differences, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in terms of their functional food potential.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mulberry (Morus spp.) fruits, leaves, bark, and branches have traditionally been used in folk medicine as diuretics, hypoglycemic, and hypotensive agents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The total phenolic content ranged from 408.89 to 574.38 mg GAE 100g-1, the total flavonoid content between 13.67 and 19.27 mg CAE100g-1, and the total antioxidant capacity between 89.35% and 97.78%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that the biochemical composition of mulberry fruits is influenced not only by genetic factors but also by cultivation conditions and ecological differences, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in terms of their functional food potential.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antioksidan · Morus spp. · Flavonoid

Abstract

Mulberry (Morus spp.) fruits, leaves, bark, and branches have traditionally been used in folk medicine as diuretics, hypoglycemic, and hypotensive agents. The underlying mechanisms of these effects are closely associated with the presence of active constituents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the antioxidant properties of different extracts obtained from Morus nigra L. (black mulberry) collected from three distinct locations in the Ödemiş district of İzmir Province, Türkiye. The total phenolic content ranged from 408.89 to 574.38 mg GAE 100g-1, the total flavonoid content between 13.67 and 19.27 mg CAE100g-1, and the total antioxidant capacity between 89.35% and 97.78%. The findings indicate that the biochemical composition of mulberry fruits is influenced not only by genetic factors but also by cultivation conditions and ecological differences, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in terms of their functional food potential.

Özet

Dut (Morus spp.) meyveleri, yaprakları, kabuğu ve dalları geleneksel olarak halk hekimliğinde diüretik, hipoglisemik ve hipotansif ajanlar olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu etkilerin temel mekanizmaları, büyük ölçüde aktif bileşenlerin varlığıyla ilişkilidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin İzmir ili Ödemiş ilçesindeki üç farklı lokasyondan toplanan Morus nigra L. (kara dut) örneklerinden elde edilen farklı ekstraktların antioksidan özelliklerini değerlendirmek ve karşılaştırmaktır. Toplam fenolik içerik 408.89–574.38 mg GAE 100g-1, toplam flavonoid içerik 13.67–19.27 mg CAE 100g-1 ve toplam antioksidan kapasite ise %89.35–%97.78 arasında belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, dut meyvelerinin biyokimyasal bileşiminin yalnızca genetik faktörlerden değil, aynı zamanda yetiştirme koşulları ve ekolojik farklılıklardan da etkilendiğini göstermekte olup, bu durum fonksiyonel gıda potansiyeli açısından bu faktörlerin dikkate alınmasının önemini vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çolak, A., Çelik, C., Pepe, A. V. (2026). Biochemical Contents of Mulberry (Morus spp.) Genotype Collected from Different Locations. Meyve Bilimi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 75–79. https://doi.org/10.51532/meyve.1904095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Chen C, You LJ, Abbasi AM, Fu X, Liu RH, 2015. Optimization for ultrasound extraction of polysaccharides from mulberry fruits with antioxidant and hyperglycemic activity in vitro. Carbohydrate Polymers 130: 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.003
  2. Chen W, Li Y, Bao T, Gowd V, 2017. Mulberry fruit extract affords protection against ethyl carbamate‐induced cytotoxicity and oxidative stress. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2017(1): 1594963. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1594963
  3. Choi SW, Jang YJ, Lee YJ, Leem HH, Kim EO, 2013. Analysis of functional constituents in mulberry (Morus alba L.) twigs by different cultivars, producing areas, and heat processings. Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 18: 256–262.
  4. Dewanto V, Wu X, Adom KK, Liu RH, 2002. Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(10): 3010–3014. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0115589
  5. Ercişli S, 2004. A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51(4): 419-435.
  6. Gerasopoulos D, Stavroulakis G, 1997. Quality characteristics of four mulberry (Morus spp.) cultivars in the area of Chania, Greece. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 73: 261–264.
  7. Hepsağ F, 2015. Siyah dut meyvesinden antosiyaninlerin elde edilmesi ve elde edilen doğal renk maddesinin gıda sanayinde kullanım olanakları / Recovery of anthocyanins from black mulberry fruits and the use as food colorants, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 118s, Şanlıurfa.
  8. Huang HP, Chang YC, Wu CH, Hung CN, Wang, CJ, 2011. Anthocyanin-rich mulberry extract inhibits gastric cancer cell growth in vitro and xenograft mice by inducing signals of p38/p53 and c-jun. Food Chemistry 129: 1703–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.035
  9. Imran M, Khan H, Shah M, Khan R, Khan F, 2010. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of certain Morus genotype. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 11: 973–980.
  10. Jan B, Parveen R, Zahiruddin S, Khan MU, Mohapatra S, Ahmad S, 2021. Nutritional constituents of mulberry and their potential applications in food and pharmaceuticals: A review. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 28: 3909–3921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.056
  11. Jiao Y, Wang X, Jiang X, Kong F, Wang SY, Yan, C, 2017. Antidiabetic effects of Morus alba fruit polysaccharides on high-fat diet- and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 199: 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.02.003
  12. Kamiloglu S, Serali O, Unal N, Capanoglu E, 2013. Antioxidant activity and polyphenol composition of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) products. Journal of Berry Research 3(1): 41-51. https://doi.org/10.3233/JBR-130045
  13. Kawvised S, Wattanathorn J, Thukham-Mee W, 2017. Neuroprotective and cognitive-enhancing effects of microencapsulation of mulberry fruit extract in animal model of menopausal women with metabolic syndrome. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2017: 2962316. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2962316
  14. Kumaran A, Karunakaran RJ, 2006. Nitric oxide radical scavenging active components from Phyllanthus emblica L. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 61: 1-5.
  15. Lee Y, Hwang KT, 2017. Changes in physicochemical properties of mulberry fruits (Morus alba L.) during ripening. Scientia Horticulturae 217: 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.01.042
  16. Miljkovic V, Nikolic G, Mihajlov-Krstev TM, Arsic B, 2018. Antibacterial activities of fruit extracts of three mulberry genotype (Morus alba L., Morus rubra L. and Morus nigra L.) and bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.). Acta Medica Medianae 57: 5–12. https://doi.org/10.5633/amm.2018.0301
  17. Orhan E, 2009. Oltu ve Olur İlçelerinde Yetiştirilen Dutların (Morus spp.) Seleksiyon Yoluyla Seçimi ve Seçilen Tiplerde Genetik Akrabalığın RAPD Yöntemiyle Belirlenmesi. Atagenotipk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 269s, Erzurum.
  18. Rahman AHMM, Khanom A, 2013. Taxonomic and ethno-medicinal study of genotype from Moraceae (Mulberry) family in Bangladesh flora. Research in Plant Sciences 3: 53-57. https://doi.org/10.12691/plant-1-3-1
  19. Rodrigues EL, Marcelino G, Silva GT, Figueiredo PS, Garcez WS, Corsino J, Guimarães RCA, Freitas KC, 2019. Nutraceutical and medicinal potential of the Morus genotype in metabolic dysfunctions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20: 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020301
  20. Singleton VL, Rossi JA, 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic–phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16(3): 144-158. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144
  21. Sun Z, Zhou Y, Zhu W, Yin Y, 2023. Assessment of the fruit chemical characteristics and antioxidant activity of different mulberry cultivars (Morus spp.) in semi-arid, sandy regions of China. Foods 12(18): 3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12183495
  22. Suriyaprom S, Kaewkod T, Promputtha I, Desvaux M, Tragoolpua YÜ, 2021. Evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of white mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruit extracts. Plants 10(12): 2736. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122736
  23. Vavilov NI, 1926. The origin of cultivated plants. Bulletin of Applied Botany 16(2): 392–393.
  24. Veberic R, Slatnar A, Bizjak J, Stampar F, Mikulic-Petkovsek M 2015. Anthocyanin composition of different wild and cultivated berry genotype. LWT- Food Science and Technology 60: 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.033
  25. Vijayan K, Srivastava PP, Awasthi AK, 2004. Analysis of phylogenetic relationship among five mulberry (Morus) genotype using molecular markers. Genome 47: 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1139/g03-147
  26. Yuan Q, Zhao L, 2017. The mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruit – a review of characteristic components and health benefits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65: 10383–10394.
  27. Zhang H, 2018. Phenolic and flavonoid contents of mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) fruit tissues and their antioxidant capacity as evaluated by DPPH and ABTS methods. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17(1): 256-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61664-2.