Journals / Meyve Bilimi / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Fruit Quality Characteristics of ‘Hicaznar’ Cultıivar Grown in Different Elevations

Farklı Yükseltilerde Yetiştirilen ‘Hicaznar’ Çeşidinin Meyve Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
9–15
Publication Date
2015-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, the fruit quality characteristics of ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar grown in Hatay were showed differences based on elevations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pomegranate is a traditional fruit species since immemorial times in Turkey. ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar is used to about to all of pomegranate orchards in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study was carried out to determine of effects of different elevations on fruit quality characteristics of ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar grown in Hatay which is growing about 8% of Mediterranean region of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, the fruit quality characteristics of ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar grown in Hatay were showed differences based on elevations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nar · Hatay · yükselti

Abstract

Pomegranate is a traditional fruit species since immemorial times in Turkey. ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar is used to about to all of pomegranate orchards in Turkey. The consumers in the local and international markets are preferred the cultivar for the dark red skin and aril colors. In this study was carried out to determine of effects of different elevations on fruit quality characteristics of ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar grown in Hatay which is growing about 8% of Mediterranean region of Turkey. For this reason, fruit quality characters were analyzed in the ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar, harvested from the lowest (10 m), low (85 m), medium (350 m), and high (500 m) elevation sites.According to the data, the cultivar was harvested between October 01 (İskenderun/10m) and November 02 (Yayladağı/500m). ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar based on the fruit pomological traits, fruit weight was ranged between 419.20 (Yayladağı/500m)-556.92 g (Antakya/85m), 100 aril weight ranged between 34.68 (Yayladağı/500m)-36.60 g (Hassa/350m), aril percent ranged between %52.35 (Yayladağı)-60.13 (İskenderun), and TSS ranged between 15.89% (Antakya/85m)-17.05% (İskenderun/10m). In addition, dark red skin color was found in both Yayladağı (a*=39.41, C= 49.65) and Hassa counties (a*=37.08, C= 47.31) whereas dark red aril color was found in Yayladağı (a*=25.67, C= 27.40). As a result, the fruit quality characteristics of ‘Hicaznar’ cultivar grown in Hatay were showed differences based on elevations.

Özet

Nar, Türkiye’de yüzyıllardır geleneksel olarak yetiştirilen meyve türlerinden biridir. Ülkemizdeki ticari nar bahçelerinin tamamıma yakınında ‘Hicaznar’ çeşidi ile yetiştiricilik yapılmaktadır. Bu çeşit, meyve kabuk ve dane renginin koyu kırmızı olması nedeniyle hem yurt içi hem de yurt dışındaki tüketiciler tarafından tercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Akdeniz Bölgesi nar üretiminin %8’ini üreten Hatay ilinde yetiştirilen ‘Hicaznar’ çeşidinin meyve kalitesi üzerine farklı yükseltilerin etkisi incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla, deniz seviyesinden yükseklikleri çok düşük (İskenderun; 10 m), düşük (Antakya, Kumlu; 85 m), orta (Hassa; 350 m) ve yüksek (Yayladağı; 500 m) olan nar bahçelerinde yetiştirilen ‘Hicaznar’ çeşidinde meyve kalite analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, ‘Hicaznar’ çeşidinin Hatay ekolojisinde 01 Ekim (10 m) ile 02 Kasım (500 m) tarihlerinde hasat edildiği saptanmıştır. Hatay ilinde yetiştirilen ‘Hicaznar’ çeşidinin meyve kalite özelliklerinden; meyve ağırlığının 419.20 (10 m)-556.92 (500 m) g, 100 dane ağırlığının 34.68 (500 m)-36.60 (350 m) g, dane randımanın %52.35 (500 m)-60.13 (10 m) ve suda çözünebilir toplam kuru madde miktarının (SÇKM) %15.89 (85 m)-17.05 (10 m) arasında değişim gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, Hatay’da yetiştirilen meyvelerde; en koyu kırmızı kabuk rengi yükseltisi 500 m olan Yayladağı (a*=39.41, C= 49.65) ve yükseltisi 350 m olan Hassa ilçelerinden (a*=37.08, C= 47.31); en koyu dane rengi ise Yayladağı ilçesinden (a*=25.67, C= 27.40) elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Hatay ilinde yetiştirilen ‘Hicaznar’ çeşidinin meyve kalite özelliklerinin yükseltiye bağlı olarak farklılık gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, S., ÖCAL, Ö., TOPRAK, Z., AVCI, F., BAYAZİT, S., ÇALIŞKAN, O. (2015). Determination of Fruit Quality Characteristics of ‘Hicaznar’ Cultıivar Grown in Different Elevations. Meyve Bilimi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 9–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/122556

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Balcı B, 2002. Bazı Ceviz (Juglans regia L.) Çeşitlerinde Farklı Ekolojilerin Verim ve Kalite Ögelerine Etkileri Üzerine Araştırmalar. Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Ens. Doktora Tezi (Basılmamış), 285s, Izmir Çalışkan O, Bayazit S, Sümbül A, 2012. Fruit Quality and Phytochemical Attributes of Some Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Cultivars as Affected by Genotypes and Seasons. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobotanica. 40(2): 284-294.
  2. Çalışkan O, Bayazit S, 2012. Phytochemical and Antioxidant Attributes of Autochthonous Turkish Pomegranates. Scientia Horticulturae. 147:81–88.
  3. Çalışkan O, Polat AA, 2012. Effects of Genotype and Harvest Year on Phytochemical and Fruit Quality Properties of Turkish Fig Genotypes. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 10(4): 1048-1058.
  4. Çalışkan O, Bayazit S, 2013. Morpho-pomological and Chemical Diversity of Pomegranate Accessions Grown in Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 15: 1449-1460.
  5. Dhanaraj S, Krishnaprakash MS, Arvindaprasad B, Ananthakrishna SM, Krishnaprasad CA, Narasimham P, 1986. Effect of Orchard Elevation on Maturity and Quality of Apples. Journal of Food Quality. 9(3): 129–142.
  6. DiVaio C, Nocerino S, Paduano A, Sacchi R,2013. Influence of Some Environmental Factors on Drupe Maturation and Olive Oil Composition. J Sci Food Agric. 93(5):1134-9.
  7. Drogoudi PD, Tsipouridis CG, Pantelidis G, 2009. Effects of Crop Load and Time of Thinning Application on Split Pits, Yield, Fruit Quality and Leaf Mineral Content in ‘Andross’ Peach. J. Hortic. Sci. Biot. 84:505–509.
  8. Faniadis D, Drogoudi PD, Vasilakakis M, 2010.
  9. Effects of Cultivar, Orchard Elevation, and Storage on Fruit Quality Characters of Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.). Scientia Horticulturae 125: 301–304 Francis FJ, 1980. Color Quality Evaluation of Horticultural Crops. HortScience15:58–59.
  10. Gözlekçi Ş, Ercişli S, Öktüren F, Sönmez Ş, 2011. Physico-Chemical Characteristics at Three Development Stages in Pomegranate cv. ‘Hicaznar’. Not Bot Hort Agrobot. Cluj, 39(1):241-245.
  11. Hasnaoui N, Jbir R, Mars M, Trifi M, Kamal-Eldin A, Melgarejo P, Hernandez F, 2011.
  12. Organic Acids, Sugars, and Anthocyanins Contents in Juices of Tunisian Pomegranate Fruits. Inter. J. Food Proper. 14:741-757.
  13. Holland D, Hatib K, Bar-Ya’akov I, 2009. Pomegranate: Botany, Horticulture, Breeding. Hortic. Rev.35:127-191. Kotwal GJ, 2007. Genetic Diversity Independent Neutralization of Pandemic Viruses (e g. HIV), Potentially Pandemic (e.g.H5N1 Strain of Influenza) and Carcinogenic (e.g. H