SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

Visible Expression of Social Identity: the Clothing and Fashion

Sosyal Kimliğin Görünür Temsili: Giyim ve Moda

Nihan AKDEMİR
Pages
1389–1397
Publication Date
2018-09-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And the results have showed that every pieces of clothing from fabric to colouring have visual significations about social identity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper includes the investigation about the relation between social identity and clothing and also fashion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:And this relationship has been taken into consideration over the visual expression because even during the ancient times, the cloths were the basic and simple way of representing the identity and social classes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And the results have showed that every pieces of clothing from fabric to colouring have visual significations about social identity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Giyim · Moda · Görsel Temsil

Abstract

This paper includes the investigation about the relation between social identity and clothing and also fashion. And this relationship has been taken into consideration over the visual expression because even during the ancient times, the cloths were the basic and simple way of representing the identity and social classes. The visible expression of identity over clothing from Ancient Egypt to today’s clothing and fashion has been researched in this article. And the results have showed that every pieces of clothing from fabric to colouring have visual significations about social identity.

Özet

Bu araştırma makalesi sosyal kimlik ile giyim ve moda arasındaki ilişkiyi kapsamaktadır. Bu ilişki, giysinin ve modanın geçmiş çağlardan günümüze kimliğin ve sosyal statünün bir göstergesi olması dolayısıyla, görsel anlatım üzerinden ele alınmıştır. Yazıda giysinin ve modanın görsel temsili Antik Mısır’dan günümüze alınmıştır. Sonuçlar giysinin kumaştan renge her bir biriminin sosyal kimliğin ifadesi noktasından görsel anlam taşıdığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, N. (2018). Visible Expression of Social Identity: the Clothing and Fashion. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 1389–1397. https://ajindex.com/articles/117024

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adams, E.C. (1990). White-Blouse and White Collar: Work,Culture and Gender. Gender and History, Vol.2, No.3 Autumn, 343-348.
  2. Akdemir, N. (2017). Gender and Its Representation in Contemporary Arts. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. Sep.-Dec. 2017, Vol.6, Nr.2, 11-22.
  3. Akdemir, N. (2017). Moda Sektöründe Toplumsal Cinsiyet Kavramının Varlığı, Sobider, Year: 4, Number: 12, August 2017, 249-267.
  4. Argyle, M. (1992). The social psychology of everyday life. London and New York: Routledge Aşkın, M. (2007). Kimlik ve Giydirilmiş Kimlikler. Atatürk Üniversitesi,
  5. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 10, Sayı 2, 213-220.
  6. Barnard, M. (2002). Sanat, tasarım ve görsel kültür. Ankara:
  7. Ütopya. Barnard, M. (2002). Fashion as communication. New York: Routledge. Barthes, R. (1983). The fashion system. London: University of California Press,
  8. Ltd. Baudrillard, J. (1984). La Mode ou la féerie du code. Paris: Gallimard. Brehm, S. ve Kassin, S. M. (1993). Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Calhoun, C. (ed.) (1994) Social Theory and the Politics of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell. Calefato, P.(2004). The Clothed Body. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
  9. Castells, M.(2010). The power of identity with a new preface, Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Davis,F.(1992). Fashion, culture, and identity. Chicago,IL:The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Demirtaş, H. A. (2003). İletişim Aaraştırmaları, 1(1): p. 123-14.
  11. Dökmen, Z.Y. (2016) Toplumsal cinsiyet, sosyal psikolojik açıklamalar, İstanbul:
  12. Remzi Kitabevi.
  13. Erinç, S. M. (2004). Kültür sanat, sanat kültür. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi. Goffman, E.(1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday. Güvenç, B. (1996). Türk kimliği. İstanbul:
  14. Remzi Kitabevi.
  15. Hebdidge, D. (1979). Subculture: the meaning of style. New York: Methuen. Hebdige, D. (1981). Subculture: the meaning of style. New York: Routledge. Hogg, M. A. ve Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London and New York: Routledge. Kawamura, Y. (2016). Moda-loji: moda çalışmalarına giriş. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Kelly L. Reddy-Best & Elaine L. Pedersen (2015) The relationship of gender expression, sexual identity, distress, appearance, and clothing choices for queer women, International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8:1, 54-65
  16. Kroeber, A.L. and Kluckhohn, C. (1952) Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, Mass., The Museum. Lurie,