Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Perception Patterns: The Case of Armenia and Azerbaijan the Missing Component of the Security Dilemma Concept

Algılama Kalıpları: Ermenistan ve Azerbaycan Vakası Güvenlik İkilemi Konseptinin Eksik Bileşeni

Pages
863–886
Publication Date
2019-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It demonstrates that the ‘perception patterns,’ which is the result of the accumulation of the past lessons, play a key role in recognition of other actors` intent and construction of anarchy and offers a more explanatory concept.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article seeks to contribute to the security dilemma concept by exploring ideational components of its mechanism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve this goal, it focuses on the effects of the formative events on the cultural products, motivational dynamics (fear, hatred, and enmity), and identity formation by conducting a case study., the article examines the construction of anarchy by employing a constructivist approach, which was regarded as the source of ‘uncertainty’ driving to the security dilemma by the realist mainstream.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It demonstrates that the ‘perception patterns,’ which is the result of the accumulation of the past lessons, play a key role in recognition of other actors` intent and construction of anarchy and offers a more explanatory concept.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Güvenlik İkilemi · Tecrübeler · Korku

Abstract

This article seeks to contribute to the security dilemma concept by exploring ideational components of its mechanism. To achieve this goal, it focuses on the effects of the formative events on the cultural products, motivational dynamics (fear, hatred, and enmity), and identity formation by conducting a case study., the article examines the construction of anarchy by employing a constructivist approach, which was regarded as the source of ‘uncertainty’ driving to the security dilemma by the realist mainstream. It demonstrates that the ‘perception patterns,’ which is the result of the accumulation of the past lessons, play a key role in recognition of other actors` intent and construction of anarchy and offers a more explanatory concept.

Özet

Bu makale, Güvenlik İkilemi konseptinin işleyiş mekanizmasının düşünsel faktörleri araştırarak söz konusu konseptin geliştirilmesine katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu maksatla, toplum hayatını şekillendirici tarihsel olayların kültürel araçlar, yönlendirici dinamikler (korku, nefret ve düşmanlık) ve toplumsal kimlik oluşumuna etkilerine vaka analizi yöntemi ile odaklanmaktadır. Realist akımın, Güvenlik İkileminin sebebi olarak gördüğü ‘emin olamama-belirsizlik’ durumunun kaynağı olan anarşinin oluşmasını konstrüktivist yaklaşımla irdeleyen makale, geçmiş olaylardan alınan derslerin zaman içerisinde birikmesi sonucu oluşan ‘algı kalıplarının,’ diğer aktörlerin niyetlerinin belirlenmesinde ve anarşinin oluşmasında anahtar bir rol oynadığını ortaya koyarak Güvenlik İkilemi mekanizmasının işleyişini daha iyi açıklayabilecek bir konsept sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEĞİRMENCİOĞLU, İ. B. (2019). Perception Patterns: The Case of Armenia and Azerbaijan the Missing Component of the Security Dilemma Concept. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 863–886. https://ajindex.com/articles/115732

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adler, E. and Barnett, M. (1998a). “A framework for the study of security communities. In: Adler E and Barnett M (eds.), Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.29-66.
  2. Adler, E. and Barnett, M. (1998b). “Studying security communities in theory, comparison, and history.” In: Adler E and Barnett M (eds.), Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.413-441.
  3. Altstadt, A.L. (1992). The Azerbaijani Turks: Power and Identity under Russian Rule. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press,
  4. Stanford University. Anderson, P.R. (2000). “Grassroots mobilization and Diaspora politics: Armenian interest groups and the role of collective memory,” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 6(1): 24-47.
  5. Arkun, A (2005). “Into the modern age, 1800-1913.” In: Herzig E and Kurkchiyan M (eds) The Armenians: Past and present in the making of national identity. London, New York: Routledge, pp.65-88.
  6. Bar-Tal, D. (1998). “Group beliefs as an expression of social identity.” In: Worchel S., Morales JF, Paez D. and Deschamps JC (eds) Social identity: International perspectives. London: Sage, pp.93-113.
  7. Bar-Tal, D. (2001). “Why Does Fear Override Hope in Societies Engulfed by Intractable Conflict, as It Does in the Israeli Society?” Political Psychology 22(3): 601-627.
  8. Barseghyan, K. (2004). “The ‘Other’ in Post-Communist Discourse on National Identity in Armenia.” In: Conference on Nationalism, Society and Culture in post-Ottoman South East Europe, (eds K Oktem and D Bechev), Oxford, 29-30 May 2004, St Peter`s College. Bilali, R. (2013). “National Narrative and Social Psychological Influences in Turks’ Denial of the Mass Killings of Armenians as Genocide.” Journal of Social Issues 69(1): 16-33.
  9. Bloxham, D. (2005). The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians. London: Oxford University Press.
  10. Bölükbaşı, S. (2011). Azerbaijan: A Political History. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltds. Butterfield, H (1951).
  11. History and Human Relations, London: Collins. Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  12. Cornell, S.E. (1998). “Religion as a factor in Caucasian conflicts,” Civil Wars, 1(3): 46-64.
  13. Cornell, S.E. (2001). Small Nations and Great Powers: A Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict in the Caucasus. London, New York: Routledge Curzon Press.
  14. Crawford, N.C. (2000). “The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relat