SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1

The Impact of Hedonic and Utilitarian Values on Airline App Users' Recommendation Behavior and Repurchase Intention

Hedonik ve Faydacı Değerlerin Havayolu Uygulaması Kullanıcılarının Tavsiye Davranışı ve Yeniden Satın Alma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisi

İnci Polat(Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi)0000-0003-4052-2009
İbrahim Halil Seyrek(KİLİS 7 ARALIK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
419–430
Publication Date
2022-01-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it shows that only utilitarian value has a positive significant effect on repurchase intention whereas hedonic value doesn’t have a significant effect on the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of hedonic and utilitarian value on recommendation (word-of-mouth and electronic word-of-mouth) and repurchase intention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By using a convenience sampling method, data were collected from 122 airline app users.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it shows that only utilitarian value has a positive significant effect on repurchase intention whereas hedonic value doesn’t have a significant effect on the study.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:hedonik değer · faydacı değer · tekrar satın alma niyeti

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of hedonic and utilitarian value on recommendation (word-of-mouth and electronic word-of-mouth) and repurchase intention. For this purpose, it is collected data from the airline passengers who actively use the airline app. By using a convenience sampling method, data were collected from 122 airline app users. The reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis will be applied to the data obtained in order to determine the factors that make up the dimensions in the research model. The relationship in the research model provided in the study is evaluated using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results of the study indicated that both hedonic value and utilitarian value have positive effects on air passengers’ recommendation behavior. However, it shows that only utilitarian value has a positive significant effect on repurchase intention whereas hedonic value doesn’t have a significant effect on the study.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, hedonik ve faydacı değerin tavsiye (ağızdan ağıza iletişim ve elektronik ağızdan ağıza iletişim) ve tekrar satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Bu amaçla havayolu uygulamalarını aktif olarak kullanan havayolu yolcularından veriler toplanmıştır. Kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak havayolu uygulamalarını kullanan 122 yolcudan elde edilen verilere, araştırma modelinde boyutları oluşturan faktörlerin belirlenmesi için güvenirlik analizi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada önerilen araştırma modelindeki ilişki, Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (KEKK-YEM) kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, hem hedonik değerin hem de faydacı değerin hava yolcularının tavsiye davranışları üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğunu göstermiştir. Ancak, sadece faydacı değerin tekrar satın alma niyeti üzerinde pozitif anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olduğu, hedonik değerin ise tekrar satın alma niyeti üzerinde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı bulgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Polat, İ., Seyrek, İ. H. (2022). The Impact of Hedonic and Utilitarian Values on Airline App Users' Recommendation Behavior and Repurchase Intention. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 419–430. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.993435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (71)

  1. Alhidari, A., Iyer, P., & Paswan, A. (2015). Personal level antecedents of eWOM and purchase intention, on social networking sites. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 14(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539215X14373846805707
  2. Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of retailing, 79(2), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00007-1
  3. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., Griffin, M., & Darden, R. (1994). Work and/or fun: Shopping measuring value hedonic and utilitarian. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656. https://doi.org/0093-5301
  4. Babin, B.J. & James, K.W. 2010. A brief retrospective and introspective on value. European Business Review, 22(5), 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341011068895
  5. Bambauer-Sachse, S., & Mangold, S. (2011). Brand equity dilution through negative online word-of-mouth communication. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 18(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.09.003
  6. Bigne, E., Andreu, L., Hernandez, B., & Ruiz, C. (2018). The impact of social media and offline influences on consumer behaviour. An analysis of the low-cost airline industry. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(9), 1014-1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1126236
  7. Bridges, E., & Florsheim, R. (2008). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience. Journal of Business research, 61(4), 309-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.017
  8. Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2012). What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision support systems, 53(1), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015
  9. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of marketing research, 43(3), 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
  10. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of retailing, 77(4), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
  11. Chiu, C. M., Wang, E. T., Fang, Y. H., & Huang, H. Y. (2014). Understanding customers' repeat purchase intentions in B2C e‐commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 85-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00407.x
  12. Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
  13. Cotte, J., Chowdhury, T. G., Ratneshwar, S., & Ricci, L. M. (2006). Pleasure or utility? Time planning style and web usage behaviors. Journal of interactive marketing, 20(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20055
  14. Daowd, A., Hasan, R., Eldabi, T., Rafi-ul-Shan, P.M., Cao, D. & Kasemsarn, N. (2021). Factors affecting eWOM credibility, information adoption and purchase intention on Generation Y: a case from Thailand. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(3), 838-859. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2019-0118
  15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  16. De Bruyn, A., & Lilien, G. L. (2008). A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. International journal of research in marketing, 25(3), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.004
  17. Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of marketing research, 37(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718
  18. Duverger, P. (2013). Curvilinear effects of user-generated content on hotels’ market share: a dynamic panel-data analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 52(4), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513478498
  19. Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K., & Barr, T. F. (2005). Perceived retail crowding and shopping satisfaction: the role of shopping values. Journal of business research, 58(8), 1146-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.01.005
  20. Farzin, M., & Fattahi, M. (2018). eWOM through social networking sites and impact on purchase intention and brand image in Iran. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 15(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2017-0062
  21. Fiore, A. M., Jin, H. J., & Kim, J. (2005). For fun and profit: Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store. Psychology & Marketing, 22(8), 669-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20079
  22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  23. Goldsmith, R. E., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of interactive advertising, 6(2), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2006.10722114
  24. Hammond, K., McWilliam, G., & Diaz, A. N. (1998). Fun and work on the web: Differences in attitudes between novices and experienced users. ACR North American Advances.
  25. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
  26. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of marketing, 60(3), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000304
  27. Holbrook, M. B. (Ed.). (1999). Consumer value: a framework for analysis and research. Psychology Press.
  28. Holbrook, M. B. (1994). The nature of customer value: an axiology of services in the consumption experience. Service quality: New directions in theory and practice, 21(1), 21-71. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229102.n2
  29. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906
  30. IATA, (2019). Air Passenger Forecasts Global Report. https://www.iata.org/publications/Documents/global-report-sample2.pdf (accessed 12.06.19)
  31. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1996). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of electronic commerce, 1(2), 59-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.1996.11518283
  32. Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., & Arnold, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of business research, 59(9), 974-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.006
  33. Kietzmann, J., & Canhoto, A. (2013). Bittersweet! Understanding and managing electronic word of mouth. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1470
  34. Kim, K., Yoon, S., & Choi, Y. K. (2019). The effects of eWOM volume and valence on product sales–an empirical examination of the movie industry. International Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1535225
  35. Kim, Y. (2015). Assessing the effects of perceived value (utilitarian and hedonic) in LCCs and FSCs: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Air Transport Management, 49, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.07.001
  36. Kohler, T., Fueller, J., Matzler, K., Stieger, D., & Füller, J. (2011). Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS quarterly, 773-788. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042808
  37. Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of marketing, 74(2), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.2.71
  38. Babin, B. J., Lee, Y. K., Kim, E. J., & Griffin, M. (2005). Modeling consumer satisfaction and word‐of‐mouth: restaurant patronage in Korea. Journal of Services Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040510596803
  39. Lee, J., Lee, J., & Feick, L. (2006). Incorporating word-of-mouth effects in estimating customer lifetime value. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 14(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.dbm.3250033
  40. Lee, M., Rodgers, S., & Kim, M. (2009). Effects of valence and extremity of eWOM on attitude toward the brand and website. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 31(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2009.10505262
  41. Lin, H. C., Bruning, P. F., & Swarna, H. (2018). Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services. Business horizons, 61(3), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.010
  42. Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
  43. Martín-Consuegra, D., Díaz, E., Gómez, M., & Molina, A. (2019). Examining consumer luxury brand-related behavior intentions in a social media context: The moderating role of hedonic and utilitarian motivations. Physiology & behavior, 200, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.028
  44. Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment☆. Journal of retailing, 77(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00045-2
  45. Mauri, A. G., & Minazzi, R. (2013). Web reviews influence on expectations and purchasing intentions of hotel potential customers. International journal of hospitality management, 34, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.02.012
  46. Michon, R., Yu, H., Smith, D., & Chebat, J. C. (2007). The shopping experience of female fashion leaders. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550710750359
  47. Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior: Investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. Journal of marketing research, 38(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.131.18832
  48. Munaro, A. C., Martins, E., & Kato, H. T. (2020). The effect of consumption motivation on the perception of gift store attributes in jewelry retail stores and its influence on repurchase intention. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 21, 788-812. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i5.4029
  49. Noble, S. M., Griffith, D. A., & Weinberger, M. G. (2005). Consumer derived utilitarian value and channel utilization in a multi-channel retail context. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1643-1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.10.005
  50. Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business research, 59(10-11), 1160-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.008
  51. Ozturk, A. B., Nusair, K., Okumus, F., & Hua, N. (2016). The role of utilitarian and hedonic values on users’ continued usage intention in a mobile hotel booking environment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 57, 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.06.007
  52. Park, D. H., & Lee, J. (2008). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.11.004
  53. Park, J., & Ha, S. (2016). Co-creation of service recovery: Utilitarian and hedonic value and post-recovery responses. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28, 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.01.003
  54. Polat, İ., & Sesliokuyucu, O. (2019). Havayolu Hizmet Sisteminde Ortak Değer Yaratmanın Tekrar Satın Alma Niyetine Etkisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(4), 3073-3085. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2019.796
  55. Pöyry, E., Parvinen, P., & Malmivaara, T. (2013). Can we get from liking to buying? Behavioral differences in hedonic and utilitarian Facebook usage. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.003
  56. Poyry, E., Parvinen, P., Salo, J., & Blakaj, H. (2012, January). Hedonic and utilitarian search for electronic word-of-mouth. In 2012 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1797-1806). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.300
  57. Rahman, M. A., Abir, T., Yazdani, D. M. N., Hamid, A. B. A., & Al Mamun, A. (2020). Brand Image, eWOM, Trust and Online Purchase Intention of Digital Products among Malaysian Consumers. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12, 4935-4946.
  58. Richins, M. L., & Root-Shaffer, T. (1988). The role of evolvement and opinion leadership in consumer word-of-mouth: An implicit model made explicit. ACR North American Advances.
  59. Rintamäki, T., Kuusela, H. & Mitronen, L. (2007). Identifying competitive customer value propositions in retailing, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 17(6), 621-634. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710834975
  60. Roy, G., Datta, B., & Basu, R. (2017). Effect of eWOM valence on online retail sales. Global Business Review, 18(1), 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916666966
  61. Ryu, K., Han, H., & Jang, S. S. (2010). Relationships among hedonic and utilitarian values, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in the fast‐casual restaurant industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111011035981
  62. Saarijärvi, H. (2012). The mechanisms of value co-creation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(5), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2012.671339
  63. Schau, H. J., Muñiz Jr, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of marketing, 73(5), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
  64. Syafita, J. D. (2018). Utilitarian and hedonic values that influence customer satisfaction and their impact on the repurchase intention: online survey towards berrybenka fashion e-commerce's buyer. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 73(1).
  65. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of service research, 6(4), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670503262946
  66. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of marketing research, 40(3), 310-320. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238
  67. Wakefield, K. L., & Baker, J. (1998). Excitement at the mall: determinants and effects on shopping response. Journal of retailing, 74(4), 515-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80106-7
  68. Wang, C. C., & Chang, S. C. (2008). Online word of mouth as a determination in adolescents’ purchase decision making: the influence of expertise and involvement. Communications of the IBIMA, 4(1), 1-7.
  69. Wang, X., & Wei, K. K. (2006). Consumers' acceptance of electronic word-of-mouth recommendations: Effects of multiple communication elements and processing motivation. In 27th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2006 (pp. 781-790).
  70. Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 25(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350
  71. Ye, Q., Law, R., Gu, B., & Chen, W. (2011). The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Computers in Human behavior, 27(2), 634-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.014