Journals / Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten / 2006 / Cilt: 54 Sayı: 2006/1

TÜRKÇE DİL BİLGİSİNDE TERMİNOLOJİ SORUNU

Pages
81–100
Publication Date
2009-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This situation negatively affected research and development as well as education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A substantive portion of the problems in the grammar of Turkey Turkish is coming from non-functional terminology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Following Language Revolution the first national curriculum was developed in 1929.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This situation negatively affected research and development as well as education.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türkçe dil bilgisi · dil bilgisi öğretimi · dil bilgisi terimleri

Abstract

A substantive portion of the problems in the grammar of Turkey Turkish is coming from non-functional terminology. The idea to perform a reform in the terminology dates back to Tanzimat era but it did not attract much attention. This issue was again made an agenda as Turkishization of Concepts by Genç Kalemler in the II. Meşrutiyet era. However, discussions about purifying Turkish overshadowed terminology issues and important developments were not performed in this issue. In the republic period, this issue was considered as an educational problem. Following Language Revolution the first national curriculum was developed in 1929. After the introducing the new curriculum, the necessity of Turkishization in education came to picture. Turkish Language Research Society (Türk Dili Tetkik Cemiyeti) was founded in 1932 and then Turkhisation of the terms were carried out by the commissions. Corresponding Turkish words were coined for the foreign words mostly Arabic. However, because an important portion of the terms coined was not commonly accepted, a unity in terminology was achieved. This situation negatively affected research and development as well as education.

Özet

Türkiye Türkçesi gramerlerindeki sorunların önemli bir bölümü, terimlerin işlevsel

🔖

Cite This Article

Demir, C. (2009). TÜRKÇE DİL BİLGİSİNDE TERMİNOLOJİ SORUNU. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten, Cilt: 54 Sayı: 2006/1, 81–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/1096867

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aksan, Doğan, Anlam Bilim ve Türk Anlam Bilimi, DTCF Yay., Ankara 1978.
  2. Banguoğlu, Tahsin, Türkçenin Grameri, TDK Yay., Ankara 1986.
  3. Bilgegil, Kaya, Türkçe Dilbilgisi, Dergâh Yay., İstanbul. 1984.
  4. Boz, Erdoğan,“Türkiye Türkçesinde +Dan Ekli Nesne Ögesi Üzerine”, V. Uluslar Arası Türk Dili Kurultayı Bildirileri I, TDK Yay. Ankara 2004.
  5. Cemiloğlu, İsmet, “Cümle Tahlilleri Üzerine Bazı Düşünceler”, Türk Dili, 1991. S. 511.
  6. Coşkun, Eyyup, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Kasım 2005, C.5, S. 2.
  7. Demir, Celal, “Türkçe Öğretiminde Zarf Tümleçleri” Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, TürkçeÖğretimi Özel Sayısı, 2003 Bahar.
  8. Demiray, Kemal, Temel Dil Bilgisi, İstanbul 1970.
  9. Demircan, Ömer, İletişim ve Dil Devrimi, Yaylım Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2000.
  10. Dizdaroğlu, Hikmet, Tümce Bilgisi, Ankara 1974.
  11. Ediskun, Haydar, Yeni Türk Dilbilgisi, İstanbul 1988.