SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten / 2026 / Cilt: 66 Sayı: 1

ON bIdgẄčIr IN THE 3RD LINE OF THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ŠINE-USU INSCRIPTION

Yong-sŏng Lı
Pages
177–188
Publication Date
2018-10-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

I sent the recruiting soldiers from there. [The soldiers] came”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis: The Šine-Usu Inscription is the most voluminous one with 50 lines among the Uyghur inscriptions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Like Tes (750) and Tariat (752-753) inscriptions, the Šine-Usu Inscription also was erected in 759 in honor of Moyun Čor, the second qaghan of the Uyghur Qaghanate (r. 747-759).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:I sent the recruiting soldiers from there. [The soldiers] came”.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Moyun Čor · spelling error · Šine-Usu Inscription

Özet

&nbsp;The Šine-Usu Inscription is the most voluminous one with 50 lines among the Uyghur inscriptions. Like Tes (750) and Tariat (752-753) inscriptions, the Šine-Usu Inscription also was erected in 759 in honor of Moyun Čor, the second qaghan of the Uyghur Qaghanate (r. 747-759). It is still on the spot in two pieces. Most parts of the Šine-Usu Inscription are now well understood. However, the south and west sides are heavily damaged and there are many illegible and/or incomprehensible words and sentences in these sides. One of them is the letter group ricwgdib&nbsp; bIdgẄčIr in the 3rd line on the south side. The sentences containing this letter group have been differently interpreted by the researchers. All of the readings hitherto are problematic. The author would like to regard the letter group ricwgdib&nbsp; bIdgẄčIr as a spelling error for ricwgidb&nbsp; bdIgẄčIr and suggests to read it as äbdigüči är ‘soldier who recruits/drafts soldier’ (< äbdi- ‘to gather, to pick up’ + -güči ‘participle suffix’). There are at least three examples of spelling error related to the position of the letter i&nbsp; I in the inscriptions. The sentences in question can be now read as beš yegirmikä …… tayγan költä teriltim. äbdigüči är anta ï<d>t[ïm. är k]älti “On the 15th (of the month) …… we (lit. I) gathered at the Lake of Tayγan. I sent the recruiting soldiers from there. [The soldiers] came”.

🔖

Cite This Article

Lı, Y. (2018). ON bIdgẄčIr IN THE 3RD LINE OF THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ŠINE-USU INSCRIPTION. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten, Cilt: 66 Sayı: 1, 177–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/1096657

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Ajdarov, G. (1971), Jazyk orxonskix pamjatnikov drevnetjurkskoj pis’mennosti VIII veka. Alma-Ata: Izdatel’stvo «Nauka» Kazaxskoj SSR.
  2. Aydın, E. (2007). Şine Usu Yazıtı. Çorum: Karadeniz Araştırmaları Merkezi.
  3. Aydın, E. (2011). Uygur Kağanlığı Yazıtları. Konya: Kömen.
  4. Bazin, L. (1991). Les systèmes chronologiques dans le monde turc ancient. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
  5. Berta, Á. (2004). Szavaimat jól halljátok…, A Türk és Ujgur rovásírásos emlékek kritikai kiadása. Szeged: Jate.
  6. Berta, Á. (2010). Sözlerimi İyi Dinleyin…, Türk ve Uygur Runik Yazıtlarının Karşılaştırmalı Yayını. E. Yılmaz (transl.). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.
  7. Bregel, Y. (2003). An Historical Atlas of Central Asia. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
  8. Clauson, G. (1972). An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. Oxford: Claren-don.
  9. Dankoff, R., Kelly, J. (1982). Maḥmūd al-Kāšγarī: Compendium of the Turkic Dialects (Dīwān Luγāt at-Turk). Part I. Cambridge/Mass: Harvard University.
  10. Erdal, M. (1991). Old Turkic Word Formation: A Functional Approach to the Lexicon I-II, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  11. Gabain, A. (1959). Türkische Turfantexte X: das Avadāna des Dämons ṭavaka, Bear-beitet von Tadeusz Kowalski. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
  12. Golden, P. B. (1998). “The Turkic Peoples: A Historical Sketch”. eds. L. Johanson & É. Á. Csató. In: The Turkic Languages. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 16-29.
  13. Jeong, J. (2005). Wigurŭ Yumokjeguksa 744~840. Seoul: Moonji Publishing Company. [정
  14. 재훈 (2005), 위구르 유목제국사 744~840, 문학과지성사, 서울 2005.]
  15. Malov, S. J. (1959). Pamjatniki drevnetjurkskoj pis’mennosti Mongolii i Kirgizii. Moskva & Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.
  16. Mert, O. (2009). Ötüken Uygur Dönemi Yazıtlarından Tes  Tariat  Şine Us. Ankara: Belen.
  17. Molnár, Á., Zieme, P. (1989). “Ein weiterer uigurischer Erntesegen”. Altorientalische Forschungen, 16/1, 140-152.
  18. Moriyasu, T. (1999). “Site and Inscription of Šine-Usu”. eds. T. Moriyasu & A. Ochir (The Society of Central Eurasian Studies). In: Provisional Report of Researches on Historical Sites and Inscriptions in Mongolia from 1996 to 1998. Osaka. pp. 177-195. [森安孝 夫, “シネウス遺蹟·碑文”, 森安孝夫·オチル 責任編集 (中央ユーラシア学 硏究 会), モンゴル国現存遺蹟·碑文調査硏究報告, 大阪 1999, pp. 177-195.]
  19. Moriyasu, T., Suzuki, K., Saito, S., Tamura, T., Bai, Y. (2009). “Šine-Usu Inscription from the Uighur Period in Mongolia: Revised Text, Translation and Commentaries”. Kobe. Studies on the Inner Asian Languages, 24, 1-92. [森安 孝夫·鈴木宏節·齊藤茂雄·田村 健·白 玉冬, “シネウス碑文訳注”, 內陸アジア言語 の研究, 24, 神戸 2009, pp. 1-92.]
  20. Drevnetjurkskij slovar’ (1969). V. M. Nadeljajev, D. M. Nasilov, E. R. Tenišev, A. M. Ščerbak (eds.). Leningrad: Leningradskoje otdelenije izdatel’stva «Nauka».
  21. Orkun, H. N. (1936). Eski Türk Yazıtları I. İstanbul: Devlet.
  22. Orkun, H. N. (1941). Eski Türk Yazıtları IV. İstanbul: Alâeddin Kıral.
  23. Ölmez, M. (2012). Orhon-Uygur Hanlığı Dönemi Moğolistan’daki Eski Türk Yazıtları, Metin- Çeviri-Sözlük. Ankara: BilgeSu.
  24. Pulleyblank, E. G. (1991). Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: UBC.
  25. Ramstedt, G. J. (1913). “Zwei uigurische Runeninschriften in der Nord-Mongolei”. Helsinki. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 30/3, 1-63.
  26. Róna-Tas, A. (1998 ). “Turkic Writing Systems”. In L. Johanson & É. Á. Csató (eds.). The Turkic Languages. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 126-137.
  27. Röhrborn, K. (2010). Uigurisches Wörterbuch: Sprachmaterial der vorislamischen türkischen Texte aus Zentralasien – Neubearbeitung –. I. Verben. Band 1: ab- – äzüglä-. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
  28. Şirin, H. (2016). Eski Türk Yazıtları Söz Varlığı İncelemesi. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.
  29. Tekin, T. (1988). Orhon Yazıtları. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.
  30. Tekin, T. (1997). Tarih Boyunca Türkçenin Yazımı. Ankara: Simurg.
  31. Tekin, T. (2000). Orhon Türkçesi Grameri. Ankara: Simurg.
  32. Tekin, T. (2016). Orhon Türkçesi Grameri. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.
  33. Tekin, T., Ölmez, M. (1999). Türk Dilleri – Giriş. İstanbul: Simurg.
  34. User, H. Ş. (2009). Köktürk ve Ötüken Uygur Kağanlığı Yazıtları. Konya: Kömen.