Dergiler / Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4

Use of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single Center Experience

Sayfa
1112–1119
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It can be said that taking anti EGFR mAb treatment(being KRAS WT) has a positive effect on prognosis.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Despite all the advances in therapeutic modalities, Colorectal Cancer(CRC) continues to be the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study was to share our experiences regarding the usage rates of monoclonal antibodies(mAbs) (such as Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab), overall survival(OS) and progression-free survival(PFS) in patients with metastaticCRC(mCRC).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It can be said that taking anti EGFR mAb treatment(being KRAS WT) has a positive effect on prognosis.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:colon cancer · bevacizumab · cetuximab

Abstract

Introduction: Despite all the advances in therapeutic modalities, Colorectal Cancer(CRC) continues to be the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths. The aim of this study was to share our experiences regarding the usage rates of monoclonal antibodies(mAbs) (such as Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab), overall survival(OS) and progression-free survival(PFS) in patients with metastaticCRC(mCRC). Material metod: This retrospective study included 210 patients with mCRC who were followed up in our hospital's oncology clinic between January 2010 and October 2020 and who received mAb treatment, regardless of their stage at the time of diagnosis. Results: Fifty-two(24.8%) of the patients received a treatment regimen with Cetuximab and 46 with Panitumumab mAb, 29 patients(17.8%) received Cetuximab and Bevacizumab mAb treatment at different times, and 22 patients received Panitumumab and Bevacizumab mAb treatment, 112 of the patients received only Bevacizumab treatment. Panitumumab and Cetuximab mAb treatment was mostly taken in the 1st lines(69.6%, 76.9%, respectively). A statistically significant difference was found between the OSs of the cases according to the mAb treatment received(p=0.001). Administration of Panitumumab and Cetuximab mAb in the 1st or 2nd series didn’t make a significant difference to PFS. Discussion: The distribution of Panitumumab and Cetuximab mAb treatments was found to be balanced. They were preferred to give it in the first line. Patients who received anti EGFR mAb treatment had longer OS and PFS duration than those who received anti VEGF mAb only. It can be said that taking anti EGFR mAb treatment(being KRAS WT) has a positive effect on prognosis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDAL, G. Ş., GÜLTÜRK, İ., ÖZMEN, A., TACAR, S. Y., YILMAZ, M., TURAL, D. (2022). Use of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single Center Experience. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4, 1112–1119. https://ajindex.com/articles/886775

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. American Cancer Society. Global Cancer Facts & Figures 4th Edition American Cancer Society, 2018. Accessible at https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/global-cancer-facts-and-figures/global-cancer-facts-and-figures-4th-edition.pdf. [Google Scholar] 2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2019. American Cancer Society, 2019. Accessible at https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/facts-and-figures-2019.html. [Google Scholar] 3. Mitry E, Fields ALA, Bleiberg H, Labianca R, Portier G, Tu D, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2008
  2. 26(30):4906–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3781. 4. Rougier P, Mitry E. Cancers colorectaux avant et après les biothérapies: une révolution dans la prise en charge des patients ? Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique [Internet]. 2009
  3. 33(8– 9):672–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gcb.2009.07.019.]. 5. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2000
  4. 18(16):2938–47. 6. Yamaguchi T, Iwasa S, Nagashima K, Ikezawa N, Hamaguchi T, Shoji H, et al. Comparison of panitumumab plus irinotecan and cetuximab plus irinotecan for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res.]. 7. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2000
  5. 18(16):2938–47. 8. Gullick WJ. Prevalence of aberrant expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancers. Br Med Bull 1991
  6. Herbst RS, Shin DM. Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor-positive tumors: a new paradigm for cancer therapy. Cancer 2002
  7. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves Erbitux for colorectal cancer. Available at: www.Fda.Gov [Last accessed 2004]. 11. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves Vectibix (panitumumab) to treat metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Available at: www.Fda.Gov [Last accessed 2007]. 12. Chou T, Finn RS. Brivanib: A review of development. Future Oncol 2012
  8. ) 13. Ferrara, N. et al. Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-V