KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Determinants of the Short-Run Interest Rate in Turkey: A Taylor Rule Approach

Dilek SÜREKÇİ YAMAÇLI
Sayfa
249–257
Yayın Tarihi
2019-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This result indicates that a sudden change in the short run interest rate was not made by the CBRT this period.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study is investigated the determinants of the short run interest rate and validity of the Taylor Rule, using Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS), Method of the Generalizied Moments (GMM) and Relative Sensitivity Analyses (RSA) for 2002-2016 periods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results of the TSLS and GMM analyses are show that there are positive relationship between the interest rate, capacity utilization rate, exchange rate and inflation gap.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This result indicates that a sudden change in the short run interest rate was not made by the CBRT this period.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2002-2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Taylor Rule · Short-Run Interest Rate · TSLS

Özet

This study is investigated the determinants of the short run interest rate and validity of the Taylor Rule, using Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS), Method of the Generalizied Moments (GMM) and Relative Sensitivity Analyses (RSA) for 2002-2016 periods. Results of the TSLS and GMM analyses are show that there are positive relationship between the interest rate, capacity utilization rate, exchange rate and inflation gap. According to the RSA results, there are stronger relations between short run interest rate, capacity utilization rate and exchange rate than output gap. In this context, these two variables can be effective indicators for predict to the short run interest rates in Turkey. Beside, according to TSLS and GMM results, interest rate smoothing parameter is meaningful and positive effect on the nominal interest rate. This result indicates that a sudden change in the short run interest rate was not made by the CBRT this period.

Abstract

This study is investigated the determinants of the short run interest rate and validity of the Taylor Rule, using Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS), Method of the Generalizied Moments (GMM) and Relative Sensitivity Analyses (RSA) for 2002-2016 periods. Results of the TSLS and GMM analyses are show that there are positive relationship between the interest rate, capacity utilization rate, exchange rate and inflation gap. According to the RSA results, there are stronger relations between short run interest rate, capacity utilization rate and exchange rate than output gap. In this context, these two variables can be effective indicators for predict to the short run interest rates in Turkey. Beside, according to TSLS and GMM results, interest rate smoothing parameter is meaningful and positive effect on the nominal interest rate. This result indicates that a sudden change in the short run interest rate was not made by the CBRT this period.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAMAÇLI, D. S. (2019). Determinants of the Short-Run Interest Rate in Turkey: A Taylor Rule Approach. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 249–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/801675

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. REFERENCES Aklan, N. A., & Nargeleçekenler, M. (2008). Tay¬lor Rule in Practice: Evidence From Turkey. Internatio¬nal Advanced Economic Resources, 14(2), 156-166.
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  3. Ardor, H. M. & Varlık, S. (2014). İleriye Dönük Yeni Keynesyen Para Politikası Reaksiyon Fonksiyonunun Tahmini: Taylor Kuralı’nın, Mccallum Kuralı’nın, Taylor- Mccallum Melez Kuralı’nın Türkiye Ekonomisinde Geçerliliği. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 24(89), 45-71.
  4. Bal, H.,Tanrıöver, H., & Erdoğan, E. (2016). Taylor Kuralı Kapsamında Merkez Bankası Politika Faiz Oranlarının Belirlenmesi: Stokastik Trend Yaklaşımı. International Journal of Academic Value Studies, 2(7), 95-106.
  5. Ball, L. (1999). Policy rules for open economies. In: Taylor J. Ed., Monetary Policy Rules. The University of Chicago Press,
  6. Chicago. Basmann, R L. (1957). A Generalized Classical Method of Linear Estimation of Coefficients in a Structural Equation. Econometrica, 25, 77-83.
  7. Batini, N., Harrison, R. & Stephen, M. P. (2001). Monetary Policy Rules for an Open Economy. Journal of Economic Dynamics&Control, 27, 2059-2094.
  8. Borgonovo, E., & Peccati, L. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Investment Project Evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1), 17-25.
  9. Borgonovo, E., and Peccati, L (2006). Uncertainity and Global Sensitivity Analysis in the Evaluation of Investment Projects, Int. J. of Production Economics, 104(1), 62-73.
  10. Brouwer, G. D., & Gilbert, J. (2005). Monetary Policy Reaction Functions in Australia. The Economic Record, 81(253), 124-134.
  11. Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gerdler, M. (1999). Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence, European Economic Rewiev, 42, 1033-1067.
  12. Cote, D., Kuszczak, J., Lam, J. P., Liu, Y., & St-Amant, P. (2002). The Performance and Robustness of Simple Monetary Policy Rules in Models of The Canadian Economy Bank of Canada Technical Reports, 92, 1-36.
  13. Demirbaş, E., & Kaya, V. (2012). Testing the Validity of Taylor Principle for Turkey from a Different Perspective. AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, 81-110. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11616/AbantSbe.291
  14. Erdal, F., & Güloğlu, B. (2005). Modelling Real Exchange Rate Behaviour with the Taylor Rule: An Em¬pirical Analysis, Proc. The International Conference on Policy Modeling EcoMod, İstanbul, 1-12.
  15. Greene, W. H. (2002). Econometric Anal