KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The prevalence of radiographic femoroacetabular impingement morphology in adolescent spine patients

Vugar Nabi
Halil Gokhan Demirkiran
Omur Caglar
Mazhar Tokgozoglu
Bulent Atilla
Sayfa
524–528
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was a difference between the two groups for sacral slope (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Changes in spinal alignment may alter hip biomechanics and predispose hip pathologies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We evaluated 230 hips of 115 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as a study group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was a difference between the two groups for sacral slope (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Changes in spinal alignment may alter hip biomechanics and predispose hip pathologies. Only a few studies have examined the relationship between adolescent spinal deformities and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome of the hip. The purpose of this study is to define the prevalence of femoracetabular impingement radiographic findings among adolescent spine patients. We evaluated 230 hips of 115 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as a study group. One hundred hips of 50 volunteers were analyzed as a control group. Radiographic images were analyzed for anteroposterior alpha angle, Tönnis angle (TA), center-edge angle (LCEA), crossover sign (COS), ischial spine sign (ISS), coxa profunda (CP), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Of the 330 hips, 57.3 % demonstrated at least one parameter suggesting impingement morphology, whereas 23% showed at least two parameters. Evidence of coxa profunda was seen in 35.5% of the hips, while a negative Tönnis angle was seen in 57.3% and a center-edge angle indicative of acetabular overcoverage was seen in 23%. An acetabular crossover sign was detected in 13.9% of the hips, while an abnormal anteroposterior alpha angle was found in 12.1% of the hips studied. Statistical analysis revealed that the radiographic signs of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome among adolescent scoliosis patients were significantly higher than the control group. There was a difference between the two groups for sacral slope (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Nabi, V., Demirkiran, H. G., Caglar, O., Tokgozoglu, M., Atilla, B. (2022). The prevalence of radiographic femoroacetabular impingement morphology in adolescent spine patients. Medicine Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 524–528. https://ajindex.com/articles/579690

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Nepple JJ, Prather H, Trousdale RT, et al. Clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement, J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21 Suppl 1:S16-9. Ahn T, Kim CH, Kim TH, et al. What is the prevalence of radiographic hip findings associated with femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic asian volunteers? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:2655-61.
  2. Lazennec JY, Brusson A, Rousseau MA. Hip-spine relations and sagittal balance clinical consequences, Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):686- 98. Millner PA, Dickson RA. Idiopathic scoliosis: Biomechanics and biology, Eur Spine J. 1996;5:362-73.
  3. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine, Eur Spine J. 2002;11:80-7.
  4. Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: Relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1747-70.
  5. Fader RR, Tao MA, Gaudiani MA, et al. The role of lumbar lordosis and pelvic sagittal balance in femoroacetabular impingement, Bone Joint J. 2018;100-b:1275-9.
  6. Kim H, Kim HS, Moon ES, et al. Scoliosis imaging: What radiologists should know, Radiographics. 2010;30:1823-42.
  7. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, et al. The contour of the femoral headneck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement, J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556-60.
  8. Lequesne M, Malghem J, Dion E. The normal hip joint space: Variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs, Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1145-51.
  9. Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain, J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:281-8.
  10. Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, et al. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: A new sign for acetabular retroversion, Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:677-83.
  11. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: A fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves, Eur Spine J. 1998;7:99-103.
  12. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: Standard values and prediction of lordosis, Eur Spine J. 2006;15:415-22.
  13. Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: Proposed classification. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003;89:632-9.
  14. Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H, et al. The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients, Eur Spine J. 2002;11:119-25. Tannast M,