Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

BAKKER CLASSIFICATION IN TREATMENT OF SACRAL STRESS FRACTURES: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Sayfa
80–84
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Further prospective studies with larger populations are needed to confirm the suggested fracture classification-based treatment algorithm.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Sacral stress fractures mostly occur in patients with a compromised bone structure.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: This retrospective study assessed 19 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with a sacral stress fracture.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Further prospective studies with larger populations are needed to confirm the suggested fracture classification-based treatment algorithm.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Sacral stress fractures mostly occur in patients with a compromised bone structure. Both surgical and nonsurgical modalities are used in the treatment of these patients. However, there is not a well-established treatment guideline. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the Bakker classification can be used as a guide when selecting a treatment modality for the treat sacral stress fractures. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study assessed 19 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with a sacral stress fracture. The patients’ demographics, imaging studies, treatment modalities and outcomes were extracted from their records. Imaging studies were re-evaluated according to the Bakker classification, and fractures were classified accordingly. Finally, the distribution of treatment modalities regarding fracture types was evaluated. Results: Three patients had type A sacral stress fractures, 11 had type B sacral stress fractures. Five patients, four of whom had prior lumbosacral fusion surgery, had type C fractures. All type A cases were relieved by conservative management. Eight type B fractures were treated by percutaneous procedures. All patients with type C fractures have undergone lumbopelvic fusion. The mean follow-up period was 31.2±18.9 months, and a marked reduction in pain was found after all therapeutic approaches. Conclusion: The management of sacral stress fractures primarily depends on the type of fracture. The authors recommend lumbopelvic fixation for fractures with prior lumbosacral instrumentation and conservative treatment for type A fractures. Though percutaneous sacroplasty is effective in type B fractures, some can be managed by conservative treatment, whereas others require percutaneous sacroiliac fusion. Further prospective studies with larger populations are needed to confirm the suggested fracture classification-based treatment algorithm.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAHADIR, S., NABI, V., AYHAN, S., PALAOĞLU, S., ACAROĞLU, E. (2020). BAKKER CLASSIFICATION IN TREATMENT OF SACRAL STRESS FRACTURES: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 80–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/175068

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A. Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Bone. 2000;27:585-90
  2. Warriner AH, Patkar NM, Curtis JR, Delzell E, Gary L, Kilgore M, et al. Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis? Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2011;64:46-53
  3. Meredith DS, Taher F, Cammisa FP, Jr., Girardi FP. Incidence, diagnosis, and management of sacral fractures following multilevel spinal arthrodesis. The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2013;13:1464-9
  4. Richards AM, Coleman NW, Knight TA, Belkoff SM, Mears SC. Bone density and cortical thickness in normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic sacra. Journal of osteoporosis. 2010;2010
  5. Tamaki Y, Nagamachi A, Inoue K, Takeuchi M, Sugiura K, Omichi Y, et al. Incidence and clinical features of sacral insufficiency fracture in the emergency department. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017;35:1314-6
  6. Lee YJ, Bong HJ, Kim JT, Chung DS. Sacral insufficiency fracture, usually overlooked cause of lumbosacral pain. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2008;44:166-9
  7. Tsiridis E, Upadhyay N, Giannoudis PV. Sacral insufficiency fractures: current concepts of management. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2006;17:1716-25
  8. Frey ME, DePalma MJ, Cifu DX, Bhagia SM, Daitch JS. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous sacroplasty for painful osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter trial. Spine. 2007;32:1635-40
  9. Zhang W, Guo X, Zhang J, Hou C, Liu Q, Tang G. [Treatment of sacral fractures with pedical screw systems fixed between lumbar and ilium]. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery. 2010;24:521-4
  10. Collinge CA, Crist BD. Combined Percutaneous Iliosacral Screw Fixation With Sacroplasty Using Resorbable Calcium Phosphate Cement for Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures Requiring Surgery. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2016;30(6):e217-22
  11. Weber M, Hasler P, Gerber H. Insufficiency fractures of the sacrum. Twenty cases and review of the literature. Spine. 1993;18:2507-12
  12. Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clini