KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Promoting scientific literacy using a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: Concept, examples, experiences

Ralf MARKS
Ingo EILKS
Sayfa
231–245
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

From experience gained in applying the different examples, the potential of this teaching approach is then reflected upon as a source for promoting the process-oriented skills of evaluation and communication as essential parts of a welldeveloped scientific literacy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper revisits the discussion about the objectives of scientific literacy-oriented chemistry teaching, its connection to the German concept of Allgemeinbildung, and the debate of science through education vs. education through science.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:About 10 years ago the sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching was suggested using these starting points.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:From experience gained in applying the different examples, the potential of this teaching approach is then reflected upon as a source for promoting the process-oriented skills of evaluation and communication as essential parts of a welldeveloped scientific literacy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This paper revisits the discussion about the objectives of scientific literacy-oriented chemistry teaching, its connection to the German concept of Allgemeinbildung, and the debate of science through education vs. education through science. About 10 years ago the sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching was suggested using these starting points. In this paper its central assumptions and criteria for structuring lesson plans are presented as they have been refined along a series of lesson plans developed by participatory action research in recent years. The summarized teaching approach intends to more thoroughly promote reflection on scientific questions in the framework of their socioeconomical and ecological consequences. This is done by inserting authentic and controversial debates on socioscientific issues into chemistry teaching, which provoke and allow for open discussions and individual decision making processes. After discussing the framework, we present one example which deals with musk fragrances used in cosmetic products, and we give an overview of different respective issues. From experience gained in applying the different examples, the potential of this teaching approach is then reflected upon as a source for promoting the process-oriented skills of evaluation and communication as essential parts of a welldeveloped scientific literacy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MARKS, R., EILKS, I. (2022). Promoting scientific literacy using a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: Concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 231–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/540894

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Aikenhead, G.S (2007). Humanistic perspectives in the science curricula. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Ledermann (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 881-910).
  2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socioscientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67–90.
  3. Artola-Garicano, E., Borknent, I., Hermens, J., & Vaes, W. (2003). Removal of two polycyclic musks in sewage treatment plants: Freely dissolved and total concentrations. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(14), 3111-3116.
  4. Bester, K. (2007). Personal care compounds in the environment: Pathways, fate and methods for determination. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH. Black, P., & Atkin, J.M. (Eds.), (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge/OECD. Bybee, R.W. (1987). Science education and the science-technology-society (STS) theme. Science Education, 71(5), 667-683.
  5. Bybee, R.W. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy, In W. Gräber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy: An international symposium (pp. 37-68).
  6. Kiel, Germany: IPN. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s image of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  7. Duedahl-Olesen, L., Cederberg, T., Pedersen, K.H., & Hojgard, A. (2005). Synthetic musk fragrances in trout from Danish fish farms and human milk. Chemosphere, 61(3), 422-431.
  8. Eilks, I. (2000). Promoting scientific and technological literacy: teaching biodiesel. Science Education International, 11(1), 16-21.
  9. Eilks, I. (2002a). Teaching ‘biodiesel’: A sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching, and students’ first views on it. Chemistry Education: Research Practice in Europe, 3(1), 67-75.
  10. Eilks, I. (2002b). ‘Learning at stations’ in secondary level chemistry lessons. Science Education International, 13(1), 11-18.
  11. Eilks, I. (2003). Cooperative curriculum development in a project of participatory action research within chemical education: Teachers’ reflections. Science Education International, 14(4), 41-49.
  12. Eilks, I. (2007, August). From technical to emancipatory action research: A six year case study on science teachers involved in a cooperative curriculum development project. Paper presented at the 6th ESERA-Conference, Malmo, Sweden. Eilks, I., & Bester, K. (2003). Noch immer geht