Dergiler / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Science investigation that best supports student learning: Teachers' understanding of science investigation

Sayfa
537–559
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This has implications for teaching investigation as required by the curriculum, and student learning for assessment rather than an understanding of the nature of scientific investigation

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Internationally, learning science through investigation is promoted as a preferred pedagogical approach.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Teachers‘ understanding of science investigation was an aspect of an interpretive case study of the phenomenon of science investigation exploring the links between learning, motivation and assessment in year 11 science.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This has implications for teaching investigation as required by the curriculum, and student learning for assessment rather than an understanding of the nature of scientific investigation
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Internationally, learning science through investigation is promoted as a preferred pedagogical approach. Research presented takes a view that such learning depends on how teachers understand science investigation. Teachers‘ understanding of science investigation was an aspect of an interpretive case study of the phenomenon of science investigation exploring the links between learning, motivation and assessment in year 11 science. Data were collected through a population survey of year 11 science teachers (n=165) in the greater Wellington region through a postal questionnaire (response rate 61%). In addition, all year 11 science teachers in a typical coeducational, middle size, urban secondary school were interviewed (n=10). Findings suggest that science investigation that best supported student learning was understood to include experiments, scientific method, and fair testing, and that few teachers demonstrated understanding of an open-ended science investigation. Teachers‘ responses indicated the influence of assessment requirements of a linear and sequential fair testing type of investigation. This has implications for teaching investigation as required by the curriculum, and student learning for assessment rather than an understanding of the nature of scientific investigation

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MOEED, A. (2022). Science investigation that best supports student learning: Teachers' understanding of science investigation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 537–559. https://ajindex.com/articles/540785

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Abd—El—Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in pre—service elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 215—233. doi:10.1023/A:1016720417219 Abrahams, I., Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? study of the effectiveness of practical work as teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945—1969. doi:10.1080/09500690701749305 Anderson, R. A. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal ofScience Teacher Education, 13(1), 1—12.doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982 Berry, A., Loughran, J., van Driel, J. H. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271—1279. Doi:10.1080/09500690801998885 Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  2. Bodner, G. M., Klobuchar, M., Geelan, D. (2001). The many forms of constructivism. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1107—1117. Bradley, D. (2005). Practicals in science education: study of the theoretical bases, rationale and implementation of practicals in junior secondary science education (Doctoral dissertation).Retrieved from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au.
  3. Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge and the modes of knowing: Relevance of teaching and learning. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing (pp. 174—189). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916—937. doi:10.1002/1098— 2736(200011)37:9 3.0.CO;2—2 Davies, E. A., Petish, D., Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607—651. Davies, J. (2005, July). Learning about science: Towards school science as ‘a way of being in the world’. Paper presented at the International History and Philosophy of Science Teaching Annual Conference, University of Leeds, UK. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (l994).lntroduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Scie