KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Reconstructing the relationship between science and education for sustainability: A proposed framework of learning

Sally BİRDSALL
Sayfa
451–478
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was also suggested that further components could be added to the proposed framework in order to develop additional knowledge and skills that could enable students to gain a deeper understanding of and ability to make decisions about the multifaceted environmental issues found in today’s world

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Science and education for sustainability have recently become estranged.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This paper presents a framework of learning containing 12 components that reconstructs the relationship between these two areas and could have the potential to overcome their current issues.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was also suggested that further components could be added to the proposed framework in order to develop additional knowledge and skills that could enable students to gain a deeper understanding of and ability to make decisions about the multifaceted environmental issues found in today’s world
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Science and education for sustainability have recently become estranged. Both of these learning areas are also experiencing issues that are affecting students’ understandings in these areas. This paper presents a framework of learning containing 12 components that reconstructs the relationship between these two areas and could have the potential to overcome their current issues. A 15 week scien- ce/education for sustainability programme that was undertaken by 22 New Zealand students aged 11-12 years was analysed in terms of the components of the proposed framework. An interpretive analysis of the learning that took place showed beneficial effects on students’ understandings. Not only did these students demonstrate understandings of sustainability and development of their scientific literacy, they also showed an emerging politicisation in that they were able to take action on an issue in a number of ways. It was also suggested that further components could be added to the proposed framework in order to develop additional knowledge and skills that could enable students to gain a deeper understanding of and ability to make decisions about the multifaceted environmental issues found in today’s world

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BİRDSALL, S. (2022). Reconstructing the relationship between science and education for sustainability: A proposed framework of learning. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 451–478. https://ajindex.com/articles/540762

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1989).
  2. Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  3. Ashley, M. (2000). Science: An unreliable friend to environmental education? Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 269-280.
  4. Bensaude-Vincent, B., Loeve., S., Nordmann, A., & Schwarz, A. (2011). Matters of interest: The objects of research in science and technoscience. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42, 365-383.
  5. Birdsall, S. (2010). Empowering students to act: Learning about, through and from the nature of action. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 65-84.
  6. Braun, V. & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  7. Brundiers, K., Wiek, A., & Redman, C. (2010). Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: From classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 308-324.
  8. Cheek, B. (2010). Goldfish bowl technique. Retrieved January 9, 2013 from http://www.gptraining.net/training/vts/group/goldfish.htm
  9. Colucci-Gray, L., Camino, E., Barbiero, G., & Gray, D. (2006). From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education. Science Education, 90, 226- 252. Colucci-Gray, L., Perazzone, A., Dodman, M., & Camino, E. (2012). Science education for sustainability, epistemological reflections and educational practices: From natural sciences to trans-disciplinarity. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Doi: 10.10007/s11422-012- 9405-3
  10. Corney, G. & Reid, A. (2007). Student teachers’ learning about subject matter and pedagogy in education for sustainable development. Enviromental Education Research, 13(1), 33-54.
  11. Crooks, T., Smith, J., & Flockton, L. (2008). Science assessment results 2007: National education monitoring report 44. Dunedin, New Zealand: Educational Assessment Research Unit. Eames, C., Cowie, B., & Bolstad, R. (2008). An evaluation of the characteristics of environmental education practice in New Zealand schools. Environmental Education Research, 14(1), 35-51. van Eijck, M. & Roth, W-M. (2007). Improving science education for sustainable development. PLoS Biology, 5(12): e306 doi 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050306 France, B. (2011). How post normal views of science have contributed to a model of communication about biotechnology. Futures, 43, 166-172.
  12. Funtowicz, S. & Ravetz. J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739-755.
  13. Gough, A. (2007). T