Dergiler / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Effects of prompting critical reading of science news on seventh graders’ cognitive achievement

Sayfa
85–107
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We conclude that prompting students toexamine news content based on the content knowledge they learned is effective in fosteringstudents to evaluate the science news critically, and thus make a positive impact onstudents’ cognitive learning.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Science teachers frequently select science news articles as supplementary teachingmaterials; however, the literature indicates that students encounter difficulties in examiningand evaluating the news content and textual elements.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This paper reports an instructionalstrategy of utilizing science news articles and investigates its effectiveness in enhancingstudents’ cognitive learning outcomes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We conclude that prompting students toexamine news content based on the content knowledge they learned is effective in fosteringstudents to evaluate the science news critically, and thus make a positive impact onstudents’ cognitive learning.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Science teachers frequently select science news articles as supplementary teachingmaterials; however, the literature indicates that students encounter difficulties in examiningand evaluating the news content and textual elements. This paper reports an instructionalstrategy of utilizing science news articles and investigates its effectiveness in enhancingstudents’ cognitive learning outcomes. In this quasi-experimental study, 118 seventhgraders from four classes in one secondary school in Taiwan took part in the Science NewsInstruction (SNI). After eight weeks of instruction about Genetics and Reproduction, allstudents were requested to present their written arguments to the selected science newsarticle. Two of the classes were prompted to link to their science content knowledge (theCK-SNI group, n=56), whereas their counterpart peers were not instructed to link to theirscience content knowledge (the SNI group, n=62). The analysis of students’ writtenartifacts revealed that the CK-SNI group performed significantly better on examining thedata and claims made in the science news, producing warrants of higher quality to supporttheir reasoning about the relationship between data and claims, and providing better reasonsto refute the identified causal textual elements. Furthermore, the results of ANCOVAindicate that the CK-SNI group outperformed the SNI group on the cognitive test, with thelargest improvement at Apply level (ηp2 = .10). We conclude that prompting students toexamine news content based on the content knowledge they learned is effective in fosteringstudents to evaluate the science news critically, and thus make a positive impact onstudents’ cognitive learning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CHANG, H., CHANG, W., TSAİ, P., CHEN, S. (2022). Effects of prompting critical reading of science news on seventh graders’ cognitive achievement. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 85–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/540760

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Anderson, W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Blooms’ educational objectives. New York: Longman. Brem, S. K. (2000, April). Using models of science to critically evaluate scientific arguments: A look at students, science education, and the popular media. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92, 473-498. doi: 10. 1002/sce.20278 Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 883-908. doi: 10.1002/tea.20385 Christensen, J. L. (2008). Enhancing students’ science content knowledge through text structure awareness. Unpublished master thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1999). The social responsibility of science and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 775-785. doi: 10.1080/095006999290435 Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 837-861. doi: 10.1080/09500690701411567 Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1421-1445. doi: 10.1080/09500690801992870 De Vos, W., & Reiding, J. (1999). Public understanding of science as a separate subject in secondary schools in The Netherlands. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 711-719.
  2. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098- 237X(200005)84:3 3.0.CO;2-A Dymock, S. (2005). Teaching expository text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 59, 177- 181. doi: 10.1598/RT.59.2.7 Elliott, P. (2006). Reviewing newspaper articles as a technique for enhancing the scientific literacy of student-teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1245-1265. doi: 10.1080/10670560500438420 Erduran, S.