Dergiler / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Student Approaches to Learning in Physics – Validity and Exploration Using Adapted SPQ

Sayfa
241–253
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our experiences in adaptation, validation and checking for reliability is of potential use for others engaged in contextualising the Study Processes Questionnaire, and adds value to the use of the questionnaire for improving student learning in specific discipline areas

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to investigate an adaptation of the Study Processes Questionnaire for the discipline of physics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 2030 first year physics students at an Australian metropolitan university completed the questionnaire over three different year cohorts.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our experiences in adaptation, validation and checking for reliability is of potential use for others engaged in contextualising the Study Processes Questionnaire, and adds value to the use of the questionnaire for improving student learning in specific discipline areas
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2030 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate an adaptation of the Study Processes Questionnaire for the discipline of physics. A total of 2030 first year physics students at an Australian metropolitan university completed the questionnaire over three different year cohorts. The resultant data has been used to explore whether the adaptation of the questionnaire is justifiable and if meaningful interpretations can be drawn for teaching and learning in the discipline. In extracting scales for deep and surface approaches to learning, we have excised several items, retaining an adequate subset. Reflecting trends in literature, our deep scale is very reliable while the surface scale is not so reliable. Our results show that the behaviour of the mean scale scores for students in different streams in first year physics is in agreement with expectations. Furthermore, different year cohort performance on the scales reflects changes in senior high school syllabus. Our experiences in adaptation, validation and checking for reliability is of potential use for others engaged in contextualising the Study Processes Questionnaire, and adds value to the use of the questionnaire for improving student learning in specific discipline areas

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖKALP, M. S., STEWART, C., WİLSON, R., SHARMA, M. D. (2022). Student Approaches to Learning in Physics – Validity and Exploration Using Adapted SPQ. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 241–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/540758

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research. Biggs, J. B. (1993a) What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.
  2. Biggs, J. (1993b). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12, 73-86
  3. Biggs, J. B., Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001) The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
  4. Binnie, A. (2004) Development of a senior physics syllabus in New South Wales, Physics Education, 39, 490-495.
  5. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258
  6. Burnett, P. C. & Dart, B. C. (2000) The study process questionnaire: A construct validation study, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 93-100.
  7. Christensen, C. A., Massey, D. R. & Isaacs, P. J. (1991) Cognitive strategies and study habits: an analysis of the measurement of tertiary students' learning, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 290-299.
  8. Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J. & Prosser, M. (1998a) University mathematics students’ conceptions of mathematics, Studies in Higher Education, 23, 87-94.
  9. Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J. & Prosser, M. (1998b) Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathematics at university, Learning and Instruction, 8, 455- 468. Entwistle, N. & McCune, V. (2004) The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories, Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345.
  10. Entwistle, N. & Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 258-265.
  11. Field, A. (2000). Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for Beginners. London: Sage Publications. Fox, R A., McManus, I. C. & Winder, B. C. (2001) The shortened study processes questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 511-531.
  12. Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972) Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance, Review of Educational Research, 42 (3), 237-288
  13. Gow, L., Kember, D. & Cooper, B. (1994) The teaching context an