Dergiler / Felsefe Dünyası / 2005 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 42

Antik Çağ'da Mümkün Modalitesi'nin Tanıtımındaki Bazı Problemler

Modal Difficulties in Definition of "Possible" Notion in Antiquity

Sayfa
46–64
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Aristotle's criticism of the Megarians turns on the concept of possibility.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:What is the possibility and possible ?
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yet anyone responding to this question must understand the meaning of possible being, contingent being and necessary being.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Aristotle's criticism of the Megarians turns on the concept of possibility.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

What is the possibility and possible ? Yet anyone responding to this question must understand the meaning of possible being, contingent being and necessary being. In this paper we wish to discuss the analysis of modal terms especially "possible" concept. The explanation and analysis of modal terms is a matter of dispute among Ancient logicians.We are unable to define modal terms adequately. One might say that the definition of modal terms is only nominal definition. In due to the fact that there is a negative character of the definition of modal notions, we could only describe a modal concept at the level of nominal definition. Some logicians asserts that definition of modalities is really circular, because modality can only be defined with each other. There is not determinate number of modal terms among the logicians, nevertheless the standard logical modalities might be arranged as follows in Aristotle's Second Book Peri Hermeneias: possible, impossible, necessary and contingent. According to mediavel logicians these four c'oncepts are standart modalities.Megarian and Stoic philosophers held that all truths about the,world are necessary. Some of the Megarians including Diodorus held deterministic views. Diodorus formulated his deterministic views in an argument entitled "The Master Argument". Aristotle's criticism of the Megarians turns on the concept of possibility.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖZ, İ. (2022). Antik Çağ'da Mümkün Modalitesi'nin Tanıtımındaki Bazı Problemler. Felsefe Dünyası, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 42, 46–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/513099

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Abdülaziz, Ismail, Nazariyyetu'l- Müvecciheti'l- Mantıkiyye, Kahire,1993
  2. Abdülaziz, Ismail,Metafizik, Çev. Ahmet Arslan, c. II, Bornova-İzmir, E.Ü.Ed. Fak.Yay., 1993
  3. Abdülaziz, Ismail,Metafizik, Çev. Ahmet Arslan, c. I, Bornova-İzmir, E.Ü.Ed. Fak.Yay., 1985
  4. Abdülaziz, Ismail,Organon II Önerme, Çev. Hamdi Ragıp Atademir, 2. Bsk., İstanbul, 1989
  5. Bolay, Naci, İbn Sina Mantığında Önermeler, Erzurum, 1981 Hintikka,Jaakko, "Aristotle and The "Master Argument" of Diodorus", American Philosophical Quarterly,Volume I, Number 2, April, USA, 1964 İbn Sina, (Şifa) İlahiyat, Takdim. İbrahim Madkur, Tahkik, Said Zade, Kahire, 1964
  6. Kneale, William-Kneale Marta, The Development of Logic, Oxford, 1962
  7. Michael, Frederic Seymour, "What is the Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus?", American. Philosophical Quarterly, USA, Vol. 13, Number 3, Haziran, 1976
  8. Öner, Necati, Felsefe Yolunda Düşünceler, İstanbul, 1995
  9. Öner, Necati,Klasik Mantık, A.Ü. İlahiyat Fak. Yay., 6. bsk., 1991 Refik el- Acem, el-Mantık İnde'l-Farabi, Beyrut, 1985
  10. Rescher, Nicholas, "Aversion of The Master Argument of Diodorus", The Journal of Philosophy, USA, vol. 63, 1966
  11. Ülken, Hilmi Ziya, Varlık ve Oluş, A.Ü. İlahiyat Fak. Yay., Ankara, 1968
  12. Yaren, M.Tahir, İbn Sina Mantığına Giriş, Ankara, 1996