Dergiler / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Effects of Computer-Assisted Jigsaw II Cooperative Learning Strategy on Physics Achievement and Retention

Sayfa
352–367
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the findings, it was recommended among other that physics teachers should be encouraged use computer-assisted Jigsaw II cooperative strategy to enhanced students’ performance

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study investigated the effects of computer-assisted jigsaw II cooperative strategy on physics achievement and retention.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study also determined how moderating variables of achievement levels as it affects students' performance in physics when Jigsaw II cooperative learning is used as an instructional strategy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the findings, it was recommended among other that physics teachers should be encouraged use computer-assisted Jigsaw II cooperative strategy to enhanced students’ performance
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of computer-assisted jigsaw II cooperative strategy on physics achievement and retention. The study also determined how moderating variables of achievement levels as it affects students' performance in physics when Jigsaw II cooperative learning is used as an instructional strategy. Purposive sampling technique was used to select two senior secondary school class II (SSSII) physics students from two intact classes in Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. Eighty students from two intact classes were assigned into Jigsaw II and Individualized Computer Instruction (ICI) groups. ComputerAssisted Learning Package (CALP) on physics and Physics Achievement Test (PAT) were used as treatment and test instruments. Analysis of Covariance and Scheffe’s test were used for data analysis. Findings indicated that students taught physics using computerassisted Jigsaw II performed better and retained the physics concepts longer than those taught using individualized computer instruction. In addition, achievement levels had significant influence on their performance. Based on the findings, it was recommended among other that physics teachers should be encouraged use computer-assisted Jigsaw II cooperative strategy to enhanced students’ performance

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YUSUF, M. O., GAMBARİ, I. A. (2022). Effects of Computer-Assisted Jigsaw II Cooperative Learning Strategy on Physics Achievement and Retention. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 352–367. https://ajindex.com/articles/476643

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Adegoke, B. A. (2011). Effect of multimedia instruction on senior secondary school students’ achievement in physics. European Journal of Educational Studies, 3(3), 537-541.
  2. Adetona, A. A. & Rafiu, A. A. (2006). Application of M learning to distant learning programmes: A case study of open university system of Nigeria. Book of proceedings, 2nd School of Science and Science Education Annual Conference, FUT Minna. Nigeria. Ajaja, O. P. & Eravwoke, O. U. (2010). Effects of cooperative learning strategy on junior secondary school students’ achievement in integrated science. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14(1). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu
  3. Alshammari, N. M. (2015). Effects of cooperative learning on academic performance of college students in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished Master Thesis, State University of New York at Fredonia, Fredonia, New York. Altiparmak, M. & Nakiboglu-Tezer, N. (2009). Hands on group work paper model for teaching DNA structure, central dogma and recombinant DNA. Online submission, US-China Education Review, 6(1), 19-23.
  4. Azmin, N. H. (2016). Effect of the Jigsaw-based cooperative learning method on student performance in the general certificate of education advanced-level psychology: An exploratory Brunei case study. International Education Studies, 9(1), 91-96. doi:10.5539/ies.v9n1p91 Bajah, S. T. (2000). The state of science technology and mathematics education in Africa. UNESCO, (925) 3-4.
  5. Cohen, E. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nded.). New York: Teachers College Press Crosby, M. S. & Owens, E. M. (1993). The disadvantages of tracking and ability grouping: A look at cooperative learning as an alternative. In National dropout prevention center Bulletin: Solutions and strategies, 5, 1-8.
  6. Dishon, D., & O'Leary, P. (1984). A guidebook for co-operative learning: A technique for creating more effective schools. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications. Essien, M. I. F. (2000). Tertiary institutions’ administrators’: Perception of students’ levels of attainment of self-reliance through the implementation of 6-3-3-4 Educational System in Cross River State (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calabar, Nigeria. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2013). National policy on education. Lagos: Federal Government Press.
  7. Fuligni, J. A., Eccles, J. S. & Barber, B. L. (1995). The long-term effects of seventh-grade ability grouping in mathematics. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 58