Dergiler / Bahçe / 2020 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

ANALYSIS OF GENETIC DIVERSITY AMONG THE KIWIFRUIT (Actinidia spp.) GENOTYPES USING MOLECULAR MARKERS

Dergi
Bahçe
Sayfa
51–57
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The result of current study showed that there is need to increase the genetic diversity of kiwifruit using different breeding approach such as mutations, crossing and germplasm introduction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:To reveal genetic diversity and provide information to conserve valuable kiwifruit genotypes, 42 kiwifruit genotypes collected from Ordu province of Northern Turkey were analyzed using a set of 11 sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) and 7 inter-primer binding site (iPBS) retrotransposons primers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Out of 85 amplified bands, a total of 40 polymorphic bands were obtained with SRAP primers. iPBS primers produced a total of 71 bands 24 of which were polymorphic.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The result of current study showed that there is need to increase the genetic diversity of kiwifruit using different breeding approach such as mutations, crossing and germplasm introduction.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

To reveal genetic diversity and provide information to conserve valuable kiwifruit genotypes, 42 kiwifruit genotypes collected from Ordu province of Northern Turkey were analyzed using a set of 11 sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) and 7 inter-primer binding site (iPBS) retrotransposons primers. Out of 85 amplified bands, a total of 40 polymorphic bands were obtained with SRAP primers. iPBS primers produced a total of 71 bands 24 of which were polymorphic. An average 5 and 3.42 polymorphic bands were obtained for SRAP and iPBS markers respectively. The similarity coefficients were calculated, and cluster analysis was performed with (NTSYSpc 2.2). Dendrograms were constructed via UPGMA based on SRAP and iPBS markers. The dendrograms constructed using the SRAP and iPBS data exhibited two clusters. The Mantel test for comparison of the SRAP and iPBS-based similarity matrices showed moderate but significant correlation (r=0.55). Most of the genotypes showed a low range of genetic diversity and more than half of the genotypes found genetically closely related with similarity coefficient ranged from 0.90 to 1.00. The result of current study showed that there is need to increase the genetic diversity of kiwifruit using different breeding approach such as mutations, crossing and germplasm introduction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞENYURT, M., YİRMİBEŞ, B., İKTEN, H., ŞİMŞEK, C., BAK, T., KARADENİZ, T. (2022). ANALYSIS OF GENETIC DIVERSITY AMONG THE KIWIFRUIT (Actinidia spp.) GENOTYPES USING MOLECULAR MARKERS. Bahçe, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 51–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/459445

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Berry, P., 1997. The establishment of kiwifruit growing in New Zealand and the development of a research programme. Acta Hortic. 444:33-36 doi:10.17660/actahortic.1997.444.1 (https: //doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1997.444.1)
  2. Cho, K.H., Kwack, Y.B., Park, S.J., Kim, S.H., Lee, H.C., Kim, M.Y., 2017. Genetic diversity in kiwifruit germplasm evaluated using RAPD and SRAP markers. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 44(3):303-311
  3. Crowhurst, R.N., Whittaker, D., Gardner, R.C., 1992. The genetic origin of kiwifruit. Acta Hortic. 297:61-62. doi:10.17660/actahortic. 1992.297.5 (https://doi.org/10.17660/acta hortic.1992.297.5)
  4. Doyle, J.J., Doyle, J.L., 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13-15
  5. Ferguson, A.R., 1990. The genus Actinidia. In: I.J. Warrington and G.C. Weston, Kiwifruit: Science and Management. Ray Richards Pub., Auckland, New Zealand
  6. Ferguson, A.R., Seal, A.G., 2008. Kiwifruit. In: Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding, Hancock, Jim F (ed) Germplasm to Genomics. East Lansing. MI, USA
  7. Guroo, I., Wani, S.A., Wani, S.M., Ahmad, M., Mir, S.A., Masoodi, F.A., 2017. A Review of Production and processing of kiwifruit. J Food Process Technol 2017. 8:10. doi:10.4172/ 2157-7110.1000699
  8. Huang, H.W., Ferguson, A.R., 2007. Actinidia in China: natural diversity, phylogeographical evolution, interspecific gene flow and kiwifruit cultivar improvement. Acta Hortic. 753:31-40
  9. Jing, Z.B., Xu, M., Lei, Y.S., 2016. Genetic diversity and relationships between and within Kiwifruit (Actinidia) wild species and cultivated varieties using SRAP markers. International Journal of Biochemistry Research & Review 15(3):1-7
  10. Kalendar, R., Antonius, K., Smýkal, P., Schulman, A.H., 2010. iPBS: a universal method for DNA fingerprinting and retrotransposon isolation. Theor Appl Genet. 121:1419-30
  11. Kalendar, R., Schulman, A.H., 2006. IRAP and REMAP for retrotransposon-based genotyping and fingerprinting. Nature Protocols 1(5): 2478-2484
  12. Karadeniz, T., 2004. Türkiye kivi üretim durumu. Alatarım 3(1), 23-27
  13. Li, G., Quiros, C.F., 2001. Sequence related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica, Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 103:455-461
  14. Liang, J., Wang, X.S., Zhen, H.S., 2007. Study on anti-tumor effect of extractions from roots of Actinidia deliciosa [J]. J. Chin. Med. Mat. 30(10):1279-1282
  15. Mantel, N., 1967. The detection of