Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Management of Failed Cranioplasty

Sayfa
201–207
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We believe that the tissue expanding techniques have also great contribution to achieve successful results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: Failed cranioplasty attempts may lead to numerous complications in a broad spectrum including cosmetic problems, infection, neurological deterioration and even death.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:MATERIAL and METhODS: A retrospective data analysis of cranioplasty cases in our series was performed including the time period between 2002 and 2012.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We believe that the tissue expanding techniques have also great contribution to achieve successful results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: Failed cranioplasty attempts may lead to numerous complications in a broad spectrum including cosmetic problems, infection, neurological deterioration and even death. Selection of the most appropriate surgical technique for second and further surgical attempts for these patients still remains a debate. We aimed to share our experience and technical pitfalls on management of failed cranioplasty, particularly for patients with large cranial defects. MATERIAL and METhODS: A retrospective data analysis of cranioplasty cases in our series was performed including the time period between 2002 and 2012. Patients required recurrent cranioplasty were analyzed in detail. RESuLTS: Totally, 101 patients underwent cranioplasty for bony defect. Of 101 patients, eleven required a revision surgery due to infection or spontaneous resorption of the bone flap. All patients underwent revision cranioplasty with pre-surgical plaster cast mold technique modified from previous studies and/or tissue expansion technique. Polymethyl-metacrylate (PMMA) was used as substitute for reconstructions. Mean follow-up was 36 months. Two out of eleven cases (18.1%) developed major complications, which led to further revision. At the end, a satisfactory reconstruction was achieved for all patients. COnCLuSIOn: Our modified molded plaster cast technique is a safe and cost-effective approach for the revision of failed cranioplasty. We believe that the tissue expanding techniques have also great contribution to achieve successful results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARI, R., TONGE, M., BÖLÜKBAŞI, F. H., ONOZ, M., BAŞKAN, Ö., SİLAV, G., ELMACI, İ. (2017). Management of Failed Cranioplasty. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 201–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/404585

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM: Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg 104: 469-479, 2006 2. Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Simard JM, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Eisenberg HM, McCunn M, Scalea T: Comparative study of decompressive craniectomy after mass lesion evacuation in severe head injury. Neurosurgery 64(5): 927-939, 2009 3. Abhay S, Haines SJ: Repairing holes in the head: A history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 40: 588-603, 1997 4. Ahmed AI, Eynon CA, Kinton L, Nicoll JA, Belli A: Decompressive craniectomy for acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Neurocrit Care 13: 393-395, 2010 5. Akan M, Karaca M, Eker G, Karanfil H, Akoz T: Is polymethylmethacrylate reliable and practical in full-thickness cranial defect reconstructions? J Craniofac Surg 22(4):1236- 1239, 2011 6. Alesch F, Bauer R: Polyacryl prosthesis for cranioplasty - their production in silicon rubber casts. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 77(1- 2): 68-71, 1985 7. Baussart B, Cheisson G, Compain M, Leblanc PE, Tadie M, Benhamou D, Duranteau J: Multimodal cerebral monitoring and decompressive surgery for the treatment of severe bacterial meningitis with increased intracranial pressure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50: 762-765, 2006 8. Cabraja M, Klein M, Lehmann TN: Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects. Neurosurg Focus 26: E10, 2009 9. Caro-Osorio E, De la Garza-Ramos R, Martínez-Sánchez SR, Olazarán-Salinas F: Cranioplasty with polymethylmethacrylate prostheses fabricated by hand using original bone flaps: Technical note and surgical outcomes. Surg Neurol Int 4: 136, 2013 10. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D'Urso P, Kossmann T, Ponsford J, Seppelt I, Reilly P, Wolfe R
  2. The DECRA Trial Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group: Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 364:1493-1502, 2011 11. Durham SR, McComb JG, Levy ML: Correction of large (>25 cm2 ) cranial defects with "reinforced" hydroxyapatite cement: Technique and complications. Neurosurgery 52:842-845, 2003 12. Ferro JM, Crassard I, Coutinho JM, Canhão P, Barinagarrementeria F, Cucchiara B, Derex L, Lichy C, Masjuan J, Massaro A, Matamala G, Poli S, Saadatnia M, Stolz E, Viana-Baptista M, Stam J, Bousser MG
  3. Second International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT2) Investigators: Decompressive s