AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightWe believe that the tissue expanding techniques have also great contribution to achieve successful results.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
AIM: Failed cranioplasty attempts may lead to numerous complications in a broad spectrum including cosmetic problems, infection, neurological deterioration and even death. Selection of the most appropriate surgical technique for second and further surgical attempts for these patients still remains a debate. We aimed to share our experience and technical pitfalls on management of failed cranioplasty, particularly for patients with large cranial defects. MATERIAL and METhODS: A retrospective data analysis of cranioplasty cases in our series was performed including the time period between 2002 and 2012. Patients required recurrent cranioplasty were analyzed in detail. RESuLTS: Totally, 101 patients underwent cranioplasty for bony defect. Of 101 patients, eleven required a revision surgery due to infection or spontaneous resorption of the bone flap. All patients underwent revision cranioplasty with pre-surgical plaster cast mold technique modified from previous studies and/or tissue expansion technique. Polymethyl-metacrylate (PMMA) was used as substitute for reconstructions. Mean follow-up was 36 months. Two out of eleven cases (18.1%) developed major complications, which led to further revision. At the end, a satisfactory reconstruction was achieved for all patients. COnCLuSIOn: Our modified molded plaster cast technique is a safe and cost-effective approach for the revision of failed cranioplasty. We believe that the tissue expanding techniques have also great contribution to achieve successful results.