Dergiler / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Trafik Kazalarına Etki Eden Faktörler Arasındaki İlişkilerin TBA Biplot Analiz Yöntemi İle Değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of Relations Between Factors Affecting Traffic Accidents by PCA Biplot Analysis Method

Sayfa
103–111
Yayın Tarihi
2018-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Trafik kazaları çok sayıda can ve

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Trafik kazaları Türkiye’de en önemli sorunlar arasında yer almaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Trafik kazaları Türkiye’de en önemli sorunlar arasında yer almaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Trafik kazaları çok sayıda can ve
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Trafik kazası · karayolu · biplot analizi

Özet

Trafik kazaları Türkiye’de en önemli sorunlar arasında yer almaktadır. Trafik kazaları çok sayıda can ve

Abstract

Traffic accidents are among the most important problems in Turkey. Traffic accidents cause a lotof loss of life and property and cause negative social and psychological effects on the society. Determinationof the conditions that could result in a fatal or injured accident is very important for taking preventive, warningand preventive measures. For this reason, it is necessary to evaluate the relationships between the parametersthat cause traffic accidents. If the number of variables is more than twice, it is very complicated to visualize themultivariate data visually. The Biplot analysis method is very useful for interpreting a multivariate dataset withless geometric dimensions. In this article, the traffic accidents data set on seven different divided roadways wasevaluated by Principal Components Analysis (PCA) biplot analysis method. The aim of this study is to investigatethe relationships between parameters that cause traffic accidents resulting in fatal and injury. The results showthat day (night), day (daylight), multi-vehicle, single vehicle, accident type (run-off-road), no intersection andintersection parameters are the most important parameters in fatal and injured accidents. The evaluation of therelationships between parameters affecting traffic accidents by biplot method will contribute to the development ofpreventive measures to reduce traffic accidents and will constitute an important ground for future studies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TERCAN, E., BEŞDOK, E. (2018). Trafik Kazalarına Etki Eden Faktörler Arasındaki İlişkilerin TBA Biplot Analiz Yöntemi İle Değerlendirilmesi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 103–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/257377

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Al-Ghamdi A, 2002. Using logistic regression to estimate the influence of accident factors on accident severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34 (6): 729-741.
  2. Alikhani M, Nedaie A, Ahmadvand A, 2013. Presentation of clustering classification heuristic method for improvement accuracy in classification of severity of road accidents in Iran. Safety Science, 60: 142-150. Alkan BB, 2011. Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemlerde Biplot Tekniği. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Ankara, 121 s. Alkan BB, Atakan C, Akdi Y, 2015. Visual analysis using biplot techniques of rainfall changes over Turkey. MAPAN-Journal Of Metrology Society Of India, 30 (1): 25-30.
  3. Alkan BB, Atakan C, 2011. Use of canonical variate analysis biplot in examination of choline content data of some foods. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 62 (2):171-174.
  4. Chang LY, Chien JT, 2013. Analysis of driver injury severity in truck-involved accidents using a non parametric classification tree model. Safety Science, 51: 17-22.
  5. Çodur MY, Tortum A, Çodur M, 2013. Genelleştirilmiş lineer regresyon ile Erzurum Kuzey Çevre Yolu kaza tahmin modeli. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3 (1): 79-84. De Oña J, Mujalli RO, Calvo FJ, Lopez G, 2013. Analysis of traffic accidents on rural highways using Latent Class Clustering and Bayesian Networks. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 51: 1-10.
  6. Eckart C, Young G, 1936. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank, Psychometrika 1: 211-218.
  7. Esteban VA, Villardón MPG, Sánchez IMG, 2017. Cultural values on CSR patterns and evolution: A study from the biplot representation. Ecological Indicators, 81: 18-29.
  8. Faes AAD, Costas R, Galindo MP, Bordons M, 2015. Unravelling the performance of individual scholars: Use of Canonical Biplot analysis to explore the performance of scientists by academic rank and scientific field. Journal of Informetrics, 9 (4): 722-733. Gabriel KR, 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58 (3): 453-467. Gabriel KR, 1978. Least squares approximation of matrices by additive and multiplicative models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 40 (2): 186-196. Gardner S, le Roux NJ, 2005. Extensions of biplot methodology discriminant analysis. Journal of Classification, 22: 59-86.
  9. Gower JC, Hand DJ, 1996.
  10. Biplots. Chapman and Hall, London, 277 pp. Gower JC, 2004. The geometry of biplot scaling. Biomet