Dergiler / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Determination of Some Soil Characteristics Depending on Conventional and Reduced Tillage Circumstances

Sayfa
51–61
Yayın Tarihi
2017-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu çalışmada, geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme yöntemleri ile toprak işleme öncesi şartlara bağlı

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada, geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme yöntemleri ile toprak işleme öncesi şartlara bağlı
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışmada, geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme yöntemleri ile toprak işleme öncesi şartlara bağlı
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu çalışmada, geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme yöntemleri ile toprak işleme öncesi şartlara bağlı
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Hacim ağırlığı · penetrasyon direnci · yüzey pürüzlülük oranı

Özet

Bu çalışmada, geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme yöntemleri ile toprak işleme öncesi şartlara bağlı

Abstract

In this study, moisture content of soil, soil resistance, bulk density of soil, and soil porosity valueswere identified depending on circumstances before tillage process by conventional and reduced tillage methods.Distribution of soil particle size, mean weight based diameter of soil particles, and the change in roughness rateof field surface were also determined based on traditional and reduced tillage methods. Trials were conductedaccording to factorial regulation in randomized parcels. According to results of the study, the lowest bulk densityand the highest porosity were obtained from reduced tillage method. Tillage method very significantly (P<0.01)influenced roughness rate. Particles with greater diameter were obtained in conventional tillage method in terms ofmean weighted diameter. Compression ratio of soil arising from tillage method generally increased more in reducedtillage method. The lowest penetration resistance was obtained in reduced tillage with 0.08 MPa, the highest valuewas obtained in the uncultivated area with 2.56 MPa.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUŞ, E., YILDIRIM, Y. (2017). Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 51–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/256691

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Adam KM, Erbach DC, 1992. Secondary tillage tool effect on soil aggregation. Transactions of the ASAE 35(6), 1771- 1776. Ahmad D, 1983. Rotary tillage-past and present. Pertentika, 6: 55-67. Anonim, 2013. T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Erzurum Bölge Müdürlüğü Raporları. Anonymous, 1974. Standart test method for particle size analysis of soil. American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Philadelphia. Bauder JW, Randall GW, Schuler RT, 1985. Effects of tillage with controlled wheel traffic on properties and root growth of corn. J. Soil Water Conser. 49: 382-385.
  2. Bouaziz A, Bruckler L, 1989. Modeling wheat seedling growth and emergence: I. Seedling growth affected by soil water potential. Soil Soc. Am. J. 53: 1832-1838. Braunack MV, 1995. Effect aggregate size and soil water content on emergence of soybean (glycine max, L. merr.) and maize (zea mays, L.). Soil and Tillage Research, 33: 149-161.
  3. Busscher WJ, Sojka RE, 1987. Enhancemant of subsoiling effect on soil strength by conservational tillage. Transactions of the ASAE, 30(4): 888-892. Çarman K, 1997. Effect of different tillage systems on soil properties and wheat yield in Middle Anatolia. Soil & Tillage Research 40: 201-207. Dan HL, 1963. The effect of tillage operations on bulk density and other physical properties of the soil. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Library, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 191 s. Eghball B, Mielke LN, Calvo GA, Wilhelm WW, 1993. Fractal description of soil fragmentation for various tillage methods and crop sequences. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57: 1337-1341. Erbach DC, 1987. Measurement of soil bulk density and moisture. Transactions of the ASAE 30(4): 922-929.
  4. Guillobez S, Arnaud M, 1998. Regionalized soil roughness indices. Soil&Tillage Research, 45: 419–432.
  5. Harris RF, Chester G, Allen ON, 1966. Dynamics of soil aggregation. In Advances in Agron., 18. edition A. G. Norman, 107-169. New York: Academic Press.
  6. Jain NK, Agrawal JP, 1970. Effect of clod size in the seedbed on development and yield of sugarcane. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 34: 795-797.
  7. Johnson WH, Taylor GS, 1960. Tillage treatment for corn on clay soils. Transactions of the ASAE 3(2): 4-7.
  8. Krause R, Lorez R, Hoogmood WB, 1984. Soil tillage in the tropics and subtropics, Duetsche Gesellschaft fur Zusamminarbeit, Germany. 319 p. Lal R, Mahboubi AA, Fausey NR, 1994. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of a central Ohio soil. Soil Science Societ