SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Determination of Some Soil Characteristics Depending on Conventional and Reduced Tillage Circumstances

Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Emrah KUŞ
Yıldıran YILDIRIM
Pages
51–61
Publication Date
2017-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The lowest penetration resistance was obtained in reduced tillage with 0.08 MPa, the highest valuewas obtained in the uncultivated area with 2.56 MPa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, moisture content of soil, soil resistance, bulk density of soil, and soil porosity valueswere identified depending on circumstances before tillage process by conventional and reduced tillage methods.Distribution of soil particle size, mean weight based diameter of soil particles, and the change in roughness rateof field surface were also determined based on traditional and reduced tillage methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tillage method very significantly (P<0.01)influenced roughness rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The lowest penetration resistance was obtained in reduced tillage with 0.08 MPa, the highest valuewas obtained in the uncultivated area with 2.56 MPa.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hacim ağırlığı · penetrasyon direnci · yüzey pürüzlülük oranı

Abstract

In this study, moisture content of soil, soil resistance, bulk density of soil, and soil porosity valueswere identified depending on circumstances before tillage process by conventional and reduced tillage methods.Distribution of soil particle size, mean weight based diameter of soil particles, and the change in roughness rateof field surface were also determined based on traditional and reduced tillage methods. Trials were conductedaccording to factorial regulation in randomized parcels. According to results of the study, the lowest bulk densityand the highest porosity were obtained from reduced tillage method. Tillage method very significantly (P<0.01)influenced roughness rate. Particles with greater diameter were obtained in conventional tillage method in terms ofmean weighted diameter. Compression ratio of soil arising from tillage method generally increased more in reducedtillage method. The lowest penetration resistance was obtained in reduced tillage with 0.08 MPa, the highest valuewas obtained in the uncultivated area with 2.56 MPa.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme yöntemleri ile toprak işleme öncesi şartlara bağlı

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞ, E., YILDIRIM, Y. (2017). Determination of Some Soil Characteristics Depending on Conventional and Reduced Tillage Circumstances. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 51–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/256691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adam KM, Erbach DC, 1992. Secondary tillage tool effect on soil aggregation. Transactions of the ASAE 35(6), 1771- 1776. Ahmad D, 1983. Rotary tillage-past and present. Pertentika, 6: 55-67. Anonim, 2013. T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Erzurum Bölge Müdürlüğü Raporları. Anonymous, 1974. Standart test method for particle size analysis of soil. American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Philadelphia. Bauder JW, Randall GW, Schuler RT, 1985. Effects of tillage with controlled wheel traffic on properties and root growth of corn. J. Soil Water Conser. 49: 382-385.
  2. Bouaziz A, Bruckler L, 1989. Modeling wheat seedling growth and emergence: I. Seedling growth affected by soil water potential. Soil Soc. Am. J. 53: 1832-1838. Braunack MV, 1995. Effect aggregate size and soil water content on emergence of soybean (glycine max, L. merr.) and maize (zea mays, L.). Soil and Tillage Research, 33: 149-161.
  3. Busscher WJ, Sojka RE, 1987. Enhancemant of subsoiling effect on soil strength by conservational tillage. Transactions of the ASAE, 30(4): 888-892. Çarman K, 1997. Effect of different tillage systems on soil properties and wheat yield in Middle Anatolia. Soil & Tillage Research 40: 201-207. Dan HL, 1963. The effect of tillage operations on bulk density and other physical properties of the soil. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Library, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 191 s. Eghball B, Mielke LN, Calvo GA, Wilhelm WW, 1993. Fractal description of soil fragmentation for various tillage methods and crop sequences. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57: 1337-1341. Erbach DC, 1987. Measurement of soil bulk density and moisture. Transactions of the ASAE 30(4): 922-929.
  4. Guillobez S, Arnaud M, 1998. Regionalized soil roughness indices. Soil&Tillage Research, 45: 419–432.
  5. Harris RF, Chester G, Allen ON, 1966. Dynamics of soil aggregation. In Advances in Agron., 18. edition A. G. Norman, 107-169. New York: Academic Press.
  6. Jain NK, Agrawal JP, 1970. Effect of clod size in the seedbed on development and yield of sugarcane. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 34: 795-797.
  7. Johnson WH, Taylor GS, 1960. Tillage treatment for corn on clay soils. Transactions of the ASAE 3(2): 4-7.
  8. Krause R, Lorez R, Hoogmood WB, 1984. Soil tillage in the tropics and subtropics, Duetsche Gesellschaft fur Zusamminarbeit, Germany. 319 p. Lal R, Mahboubi AA, Fausey NR, 1994. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of a central Ohio soil. Soil Science Societ