KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Bilgisayar Destekli İş Birliğiyle Öğrenme Ortamında van Hiele Geometrik Düşünme Seviyelerinin Gelişiminin İncelenmesi

Investigation of the Development of van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thinking in a Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Environment

Emre ÖZKAN
Diler ÖNER
Sayfa
473–490
Yayın Tarihi
2019-08-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Considering that in international assessments Turkish students score lower than the international average in geometry and the lowest in the collaborative problem-solving area, it becomes even more important to integrate CSCL environments into Turkish curricula.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study investigated the use of a well-designed computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment, namely Virtual Math Teams (VMT), to develop middle school students’ geometric thinking.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The VMT chat logs were qualitatively analyzed using the three-core collaborative problem-solving competencies used in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Considering that in international assessments Turkish students score lower than the international average in geometry and the lowest in the collaborative problem-solving area, it becomes even more important to integrate CSCL environments into Turkish curricula.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Bilgisayar destekli iş birliğiyle öğrenme · sanal matematik takımları · van Hiele geometrik düşünme seviyesi

Özet

This study investigated the use of a well-designed computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment, namely Virtual Math Teams (VMT), to develop middle school students’ geometric thinking. It also looked into students’ VMT discourse to better understand factors leading to higher van Hiele levels of geometric thinking. The participants of the study were selected from middle school students who were at the visual geometric thinking level. For treatment, students were presented with a set of activities on quadrilaterals, which were developed based on van Hiele’s phases of learning geometry, within the VMT environment. The data were collected using the van Hiele Geometry Test. The VMT chat logs were qualitatively analyzed using the three-core collaborative problem-solving competencies used in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015. The results showed that the participants significantly developed their van Hiele Geometry Test scores after the intervention. Qualitative results pointed out that collaborative competencies could be essential in developing students’ geometric thinking levels within the VMT environment. Considering that in international assessments Turkish students score lower than the international average in geometry and the lowest in the collaborative problem-solving area, it becomes even more important to integrate CSCL environments into Turkish curricula.

Abstract

This study investigated the use of a well-designed computer-supported collaborative learning environment, namely Virtual Math Teams (VMT), to develop middle school students’ geometric thinking. It also looked into students’ VMT discourse to better understand factors leading to higher van Hiele levels of geometric thinking. The participants of the study were selected from middle school students who were at the visual geometric thinking level. For treatment, students were presented with a set of activities on quadrilaterals, which were developed based on van Hiele’s phases of learning geometry, within the VMT environment. The data were collected by using the van Hiele Geometry Test. The VMT chat logs were qualitatively analyzed using the three-core collaborative problem-solving competencies used in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015. The results showed that the participants significantly developed their van Hiele Geometry Test scores after the intervention. Qualitative results pointed out that collaborative competencies could be essential in developing students’ geometric thinking levels within the VMT environment. Considering that Turkish students score lower than the international average in geometry and the lowest in collaborative problem solving area in international assessments, it becomes even more important to integrate CSCL environments into Turkish curricula.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZKAN, E., ÖNER, D. (2019). Bilgisayar Destekli İş Birliğiyle Öğrenme Ortamında van Hiele Geometrik Düşünme Seviyelerinin Gelişiminin İncelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 473–490. https://ajindex.com/articles/248300

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Abdullah, A., & Zakaria, E. (2013). The effects of van Hiele’s phase-based instruction using the geometer’s sketchpad (GSP) on students’ levels of geometric thinking. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering, and Technology, 5(5), 1652-1660.
  2. Abdullah, A., Surif, J., Tahir, Tahir, L., Ibrahim, N., & Zakaria, E. (2015). Enhancing students’ geometrical thinking levels through van Hiele’s phase-based Geometer’s Sketchpad-aided learning. Engineering Education (ICEED), IEEE 7th International Conference, (pp. 106-111).
  3. Burger, W., & Shaughnessy, J. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31-48.
  4. Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Teaching and Learning, K-12 – 1987
  5. Yearbook. Virginia, USA, NCTM. Duatepe, A. (2000). An investigation of the relationship between van Hiele geometric level of thinking and demographic variables for preservice elementary school teachers. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara,
  6. Turkey. Duatepe-Paksu, A., & Ubuz, B. (2009). Effects of drama-based geometry instruction on student achievement, attitudes, and thinking levels. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 272-286.
  7. Duatepe-Paksu, A. (2016). van Hiele geometrik düşünme düzeyleri. E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan, & İ. Ö. Zembat (Eds.). In Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler (pp. 266-275). Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Güven, B., & Kosa, T. (2008). The effect of dynamic geometry software on student mathematics teachers’ spatial visualization skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4). Halat, E. (2006). Sex-related differences in the acquisition of the van Hiele levels and motivation in learning geometry. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2), 173-183.
  9. Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
  10. Karakuş, F., & Peker, M. (2015). The effects of dynamic geometry software and physical manipulatives on pre-service primary teachers’ van Hiele levels and spatial abilities. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 6(3), 338-365.
  11. Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. T. Koschmann (Ed.). CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, (pp. 1–23