KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates by Cu(II) and Ni(II) acetylacetonates anchored onto Siral 80

Senem COŞKUN
Zeynep TAŞÇI
Mahmut ULUSOY
Mürüvvet YURDAKOÇ
Sayfa
600–610
Yayın Tarihi
2014-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Modification with APTES made the immobilized metal complexes more efficient catalysts compared to their homogeneous counterparts and supporting material.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Ni and Cu acetylacetonates were anchored onto Siral 80 and used in the catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The catalytic domains of the prepared heterogeneous complexes and their homogeneous counterparts were examined for the conversion reaction of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates in the presence of different additives (1.5 MPa CO2 pressure, 100 °C, and 2 h).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Modification with APTES made the immobilized metal complexes more efficient catalysts compared to their homogeneous counterparts and supporting material.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Siral 80 · metal acetylacetonate · carbon dioxide

Özet

Ni and Cu acetylacetonates were anchored onto Siral 80 and used in the catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide. The catalysts were characterized by several methods such as XRD, FTIR, SEM, and TGA/DTG. The catalytic domains of the prepared heterogeneous complexes and their homogeneous counterparts were examined for the conversion reaction of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates in the presence of different additives (1.5 MPa CO2 pressure, 100 °C, and 2 h). Good to excellent conversions were observed using Siral 80/APTES/Cu(acac)2 catalysts and butylmethylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [bmim]PF6, ionic liquid from the reaction of CO2, and different epoxides. Modification with APTES made the immobilized metal complexes more efficient catalysts compared to their homogeneous counterparts and supporting material.

Abstract

Ni and Cu acetylacetonates were anchored onto Siral 80 and used in the catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide. The catalysts were characterized by several methods such as XRD, FTIR, SEM, and TGA/DTG. The catalytic domains of the prepared heterogeneous complexes and their homogeneous counterparts were examined for the conversion reaction of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates in the presence of different additives (1.5 MPa CO2 pressure, 100 °C, and 2 h). Good to excellent conversions were observed using Siral 80/APTES/Cu(acac)2 catalysts and butylmethylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [bmim]PF6, ionic liquid from the reaction of CO2, and different epoxides. Modification with APTES made the immobilized metal complexes more efficient catalysts compared to their homogeneous counterparts and supporting material.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

COŞKUN, S., TAŞÇI, Z., ULUSOY, M., YURDAKOÇ, M. (2014). Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates by Cu(II) and Ni(II) acetylacetonates anchored onto Siral 80. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 600–610. https://ajindex.com/articles/185354

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (29)

  1. Valkenberg, M. H.; H¨olderich, W. F. Catal. Rev. 2002, 44, 321–374.
  2. Corma, A.; Garcia, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1391–1412.
  3. Dioos, B. M. L.; Vankelecom, I. F. J.; Jacobs, P. A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1413–1446.
  4. Motokura, K.; Itagaki, S.; Iwasawa, Y.; Miyaji, A.; Baba, T. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1876–1880.
  5. Sun, J.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, W.; Ren, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3588–3591.
  6. He, T.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, K., Han, B.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, T.; Liu, Z. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 6992–6997.
  7. Sun, J.; Ren, J.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 423–426.
  8. Zhao, Y.; Tian, J. S.; Qi, X. H.; Han, Z. N.; Zhang, Y. Y.; He, L. N. J. Mol. Cat. A 2007, 271, 284–289.
  9. Chang, T.; Jin, L.; Jing, H. ChemCatChem 2009, 1, 379–383.
  10. Decortes, A.; Castilla, A. M.; Kleij, A. W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9822–9837. Ta¸scı, Z.; Kunduracıo˘glu, A.; Kani, ˙I.; C¸ etinkaya, B. ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 831–835.
  11. Yasuda, H.; He, L. N.; Sakakura, T. J. Catal. 2002, 209, 547–550.
  12. Buchard, A.; Kember, M. R.; Sandeman, K. G.; Williams, C. K. Chem. Comm. 2011, 47, 212–214.
  13. Man, M. L.; Lam, K. C.; Sit, W. N.; Ng, S. M.; Zhou, Z.; Lin, Z.; Lau, C. P. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1004–1015.
  14. Song, J.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, S.; Wu, T.; Jiang, T.; Han, B. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1031–1036.
  15. Ramidi, P.; Munshi, P.; Gartia, Y.; Pulla, S.; Biris, A. S.; Paul, A.; Ghosh, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011, 512, 273–277.
  16. Srivastava, R.; Bennur, T. H.; Srinivas, D. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 226, 199–205.
  17. Yamaguchi, K.; Ebitani, K.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, H.; Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4526–4527.
  18. Srivastava, R.; Srinivas, D.; Ratnasamy, P. J. Catal. 2005, 233, 1–15.
  19. Murugan, C.; Sharma, S. K.; Jasra, R. V.; Bajaj, H. C. Ind. J. Chem. 2010, 49A, 288–294.
  20. Ramin, M.; Vegten, N.; Grunwaldt, J. D.; Baiker, A. J. Mol. Cat. A 2006, 258, 165–171.
  21. Liang, S.; Liu, H.; Jiang, T.; Song, J.; Yang, G.; Han, B. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2131–2133.
  22. Du, Y., Cai, F., Kong, D. L.; He, L. N. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 518–523.
  23. Macias, E. E.; Ratnasamy, P.; Carreon, M. A. Catal. Today 2012, 198, 215–218.
  24. Carreon, M. A. In. J. Chem. A 2012, 51A, 1306–1314.
  25. Zhu, M.; Srinivas, D; Bhogeswararao, S.; Ratnasamy, P.; Carreon, M. A. Catal. Commun. 2013, 32, 36–40.
  26. Ulusoy, M.; Cetinkaya, E.; Cetinkaya, B. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 23, 68–74.
  27. Sakai, T.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Ema, T. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 337–341.
  28. Shiels, R. A.; Jones, C. W. J. Mol. Cat. A 2007, 261, 160–166.
  29. Srivastava, R.; Srinivas, D.; Ratnasamy, P. Tetrahedron