SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates by Cu(II) and Ni(II) acetylacetonates anchored onto Siral 80

Senem COŞKUN
Zeynep TAŞÇI
Mahmut ULUSOY
Mürüvvet YURDAKOÇ
Pages
600–610
Publication Date
2014-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Modification with APTES made the immobilized metal complexes more efficient catalysts compared to their homogeneous counterparts and supporting material.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ni and Cu acetylacetonates were anchored onto Siral 80 and used in the catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The catalytic domains of the prepared heterogeneous complexes and their homogeneous counterparts were examined for the conversion reaction of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates in the presence of different additives (1.5 MPa CO2 pressure, 100 °C, and 2 h).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Modification with APTES made the immobilized metal complexes more efficient catalysts compared to their homogeneous counterparts and supporting material.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Siral 80 · metal acetylacetonate · carbon dioxide

Abstract

Ni and Cu acetylacetonates were anchored onto Siral 80 and used in the catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide. The catalysts were characterized by several methods such as XRD, FTIR, SEM, and TGA/DTG. The catalytic domains of the prepared heterogeneous complexes and their homogeneous counterparts were examined for the conversion reaction of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates in the presence of different additives (1.5 MPa CO2 pressure, 100 °C, and 2 h). Good to excellent conversions were observed using Siral 80/APTES/Cu(acac)2 catalysts and butylmethylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [bmim]PF6, ionic liquid from the reaction of CO2, and different epoxides. Modification with APTES made the immobilized metal complexes more efficient catalysts compared to their homogeneous counterparts and supporting material.

Özet

Ni and Cu acetylacetonates were anchored onto Siral 80 and used in the catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide. The catalysts were characterized by several methods such as XRD, FTIR, SEM, and TGA/DTG. The catalytic domains of the prepared heterogeneous complexes and their homogeneous counterparts were examined for the conversion reaction of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates in the presence of different additives (1.5 MPa CO2 pressure, 100 °C, and 2 h). Good to excellent conversions were observed using Siral 80/APTES/Cu(acac)2 catalysts and butylmethylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [bmim]PF6, ionic liquid from the reaction of CO2, and different epoxides. Modification with APTES made the immobilized metal complexes more efficient catalysts compared to their homogeneous counterparts and supporting material.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, S., TAŞÇI, Z., ULUSOY, M., YURDAKOÇ, M. (2014). Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates by Cu(II) and Ni(II) acetylacetonates anchored onto Siral 80. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 600–610. https://ajindex.com/articles/185354

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Valkenberg, M. H.; H¨olderich, W. F. Catal. Rev. 2002, 44, 321–374.
  2. Corma, A.; Garcia, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1391–1412.
  3. Dioos, B. M. L.; Vankelecom, I. F. J.; Jacobs, P. A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1413–1446.
  4. Motokura, K.; Itagaki, S.; Iwasawa, Y.; Miyaji, A.; Baba, T. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1876–1880.
  5. Sun, J.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, W.; Ren, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3588–3591.
  6. He, T.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, K., Han, B.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, T.; Liu, Z. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 6992–6997.
  7. Sun, J.; Ren, J.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 423–426.
  8. Zhao, Y.; Tian, J. S.; Qi, X. H.; Han, Z. N.; Zhang, Y. Y.; He, L. N. J. Mol. Cat. A 2007, 271, 284–289.
  9. Chang, T.; Jin, L.; Jing, H. ChemCatChem 2009, 1, 379–383.
  10. Decortes, A.; Castilla, A. M.; Kleij, A. W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9822–9837. Ta¸scı, Z.; Kunduracıo˘glu, A.; Kani, ˙I.; C¸ etinkaya, B. ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 831–835.
  11. Yasuda, H.; He, L. N.; Sakakura, T. J. Catal. 2002, 209, 547–550.
  12. Buchard, A.; Kember, M. R.; Sandeman, K. G.; Williams, C. K. Chem. Comm. 2011, 47, 212–214.
  13. Man, M. L.; Lam, K. C.; Sit, W. N.; Ng, S. M.; Zhou, Z.; Lin, Z.; Lau, C. P. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1004–1015.
  14. Song, J.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, S.; Wu, T.; Jiang, T.; Han, B. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1031–1036.
  15. Ramidi, P.; Munshi, P.; Gartia, Y.; Pulla, S.; Biris, A. S.; Paul, A.; Ghosh, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011, 512, 273–277.
  16. Srivastava, R.; Bennur, T. H.; Srinivas, D. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 226, 199–205.
  17. Yamaguchi, K.; Ebitani, K.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, H.; Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4526–4527.
  18. Srivastava, R.; Srinivas, D.; Ratnasamy, P. J. Catal. 2005, 233, 1–15.
  19. Murugan, C.; Sharma, S. K.; Jasra, R. V.; Bajaj, H. C. Ind. J. Chem. 2010, 49A, 288–294.
  20. Ramin, M.; Vegten, N.; Grunwaldt, J. D.; Baiker, A. J. Mol. Cat. A 2006, 258, 165–171.
  21. Liang, S.; Liu, H.; Jiang, T.; Song, J.; Yang, G.; Han, B. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2131–2133.
  22. Du, Y., Cai, F., Kong, D. L.; He, L. N. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 518–523.
  23. Macias, E. E.; Ratnasamy, P.; Carreon, M. A. Catal. Today 2012, 198, 215–218.
  24. Carreon, M. A. In. J. Chem. A 2012, 51A, 1306–1314.
  25. Zhu, M.; Srinivas, D; Bhogeswararao, S.; Ratnasamy, P.; Carreon, M. A. Catal. Commun. 2013, 32, 36–40.
  26. Ulusoy, M.; Cetinkaya, E.; Cetinkaya, B. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 23, 68–74.
  27. Sakai, T.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Ema, T. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 337–341.
  28. Shiels, R. A.; Jones, C. W. J. Mol. Cat. A 2007, 261, 160–166.
  29. Srivastava, R.; Srinivas, D.; Ratnasamy, P. Tetrahedron