Dergiler / Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

Siber Aylaklığı Öngörmek: Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Motivasyon, Azim ve Akademik Ertelemenin Rolleri

Predicting Cyberloafing: The Roles of Motivation, Grit, and Procrastination in University Students

Özge Canoğulları(ARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2867-7948
Kıvanç Bozkuş(ARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4787-3664
Sayfa
214–226
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuçlar, yüksek motivasyonun daha yüksek azmi öngördüğünü, azimli olmanın akademik ertelemeyi olumsuz yönde etkilediğini ve akademik ertelemenin siber aylaklık davranışlarını pozitif yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki bir üniversitede öğrenim gören 468 lisans öğrencisinin motivasyon, azim, akademik erteleme ve siber aylaklık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi amaçlamıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırmada, motivasyonun aylaklığı dolaylı olarak önce azim, ardından akademik erteleme yoluyla etkilediği ardışık bir aracılık modeli önerilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuçlar, yüksek motivasyonun daha yüksek azmi öngördüğünü, azimli olmanın akademik ertelemeyi olumsuz yönde etkilediğini ve akademik ertelemenin siber aylaklık davranışlarını pozitif yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Motivasyon · Azim · Akademik erteleme

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki bir üniversitede öğrenim gören 468 lisans öğrencisinin motivasyon, azim, akademik erteleme ve siber aylaklık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Araştırmada, motivasyonun aylaklığı dolaylı olarak önce azim, ardından akademik erteleme yoluyla etkilediği ardışık bir aracılık modeli önerilmiştir. Katılımcıların motivasyon düzenleme stratejileri, azim düzeyleri, akademik erteleme eğilimleri ve siber aylaklık davranışları geçerliliği kanıtlanmış ölçme araçlarıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Verilerin normal dağılmaması nedeniyle sağlam maksimum yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen yapısal eşitlik modellemesi, öne sürülen model ile veriler arasında çok iyi bir uyum olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuçlar, yüksek motivasyonun daha yüksek azmi öngördüğünü, azimli olmanın akademik ertelemeyi olumsuz yönde etkilediğini ve akademik ertelemenin siber aylaklık davranışlarını pozitif yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu bulgular, öğretmen adaylarında motivasyon ve azim gibi kişisel özelliklerin geliştirilmesinin, akademik erteleme ve dijital ortamda dikkat dağıtıcı davranışları azaltmada önemli bir rol oynayabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu sebeple üniversitelerin Eğitim Fakülteleri’ndeki öğrencilerin çalışma davranışlarını iyileştirilecek, teknolojik aletleri verimli kullanmalarını sağlayacak politikalar benimsenmesi önerilmektedir. Öğretmen eğitimi ve öz düzenleme becerilerini destekleyen müdahale programları için çeşitli öneriler sunulmaktadır.

Abstract

This study explored the relationships between motivation, grit, academic procrastination, and cyberloafing among 468 undergraduate education students at a Turkish university. A serial mediation model was proposed, suggesting that motivation indirectly influences cyberloafing through the sequential effects of grit and academic procrastination. Data were collected using validated instruments measuring motivation regulation, grit, academic procrastination tendencies, and cyberloafing behavior. Structural equation modeling with robust maximum likelihood estimation, due to non-normality of the data, showed an excellent fit with the proposed model. The findings supported the hypothesized relationships: higher motivation predicted greater grit, which in turn was associated with lower levels of academic procrastination, which then predicted higher levels of cyberloafing. These results underscore the importance of promoting motivation and grit among pre-service teachers as protective factors against procrastination and its potential consequences in digital contexts. For this reason, it is recommended that universities adopt policies that will improve the study behaviors of students in Faculties of Education and enable them to use technological tools efficiently. Implications for teacher education programs and intervention strategies aimed at enhancing self-regulation and academic performance are discussed in detail.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Canoğulları, Ö., Bozkuş, K. (2026). Siber Aylaklığı Öngörmek: Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Motivasyon, Azim ve Akademik Ertelemenin Rolleri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 214–226. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1707234

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (102)

  1. Akın, A., Ulukök, E., & Arar, T. (2017). Analyzing the relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing: A study in a public university. RSEP International Conferences on Social Is-sues and Economic Studies: 4th Multidisciplinary Conference, Prague, 9–20.
  2. Artan, T., Lotfi, S., Özkan, A. O., Oğuz, T. N., Akar, C., & Taşci, A. (2024). Sosyal hizmet bölümü öğrencilerinin akademik moti-vasyonlarının akademik erteleme eğilimleri üzerindeki etkisi-nin değerlendirilmesi. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 35(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.1247081
  3. Alrabai, F. (2024). Modeling the relationship between classroom emotions, motivation, and learner willingness to communi-cate in EFL: Applying a holistic approach of positive psychol-ogy in SLA research. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(7), 2465–2483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2053138
  4. Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954). A test of goodness offit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 765–769.
  5. Arco-Tirado, J. L., Fernández-Martín, F. D., & Hoyle, H. R. (2018). Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Grit-S scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00096
  6. Baars, G. J., Schmidt, H. G., Hermus, P., van der Molen, H. T., Ar-nold, I. J., & Smeets, G. (2021). Which students benefit most from an intervention aimed at reducing academic procrasti-nation? European Journal of Higher Education, 1-19, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1999294
  7. Balkıs, M., & Duru, E. (2022). Investigation of the psychometric properties of the short form of the Academic Procrastination Scale. Pamukkale University Journal of Faculty of Education, 54, 410–425.
  8. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation fail-ure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1
  9. Beri, D. N., & Anand, S. (2020). Consequences of cyberloafing—A literature review. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(6), 434–440.
  10. Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locusof control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1067–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008
  11. Blau, G., Yang, Y., & Ward-Cook, K. (2006). Testing a measure of cyberloafing. Journal of Allied Health, 35(1), 9–17.
  12. Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 972-1059. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.43.4.972
  13. Bozgün, K., Can, F., & Baytemir, K. (2022). Adaptation of the triarchic model of grit scale and perceived academic under-achievement scale into Turkish. International Journal of Psy-chology and Educational Studies, 9(3), 691-705. https://dx.doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.3.736
  14. Chi, X. (2023). The influence of presence types on learning en-gagement in a MOOC: The role of autonomous motivationand grit. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 5169–5181. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S442794
  15. Chou, M.-H. (2023). Examining the influence of L2 grit and En-glish proficiency on learning approaches: A mediation analysis through expectancy of success and perceived task difficulty. Educational Psychology, 43(9), 1102–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2281256
  16. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
  17. Çakmak, N., & Gökçearslan, Ş. (2025). Academic motivation, cy-berloafing, and multiscreen addiction in university students. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 13(2), 822-854. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1651022
  18. Çiftçi, İ. (2023). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ve akademik erteleme: Spor bilimleri öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Yalova Üniver-sitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(3), 245-257.
  19. Çok, R., & Kutlu, M. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerin ders esnasın-da ders dışı internet kullanım davranışları ile akademik güdülenme düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sci-ences, 4(1), 1-21.
  20. Datu, J. A. D., Yuen, M., & Chen, G. (2017). Development and val-idation of the Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS): Evidence from Filipino undergraduate students. Personality and Individ-ual Differences, 114, 198-205.
  21. Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927-939.
  22. Duckworth, A. L. (2017). Grit—Why passion and resilience are the secrets to success. Vermilion.
  23. Duckworth, A. L., Eichstaedt, J. C., & Ungar, L. H. (2015). The me-chanics of human achievement. Social and Personality Psy-chology Compass, 9(7), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12178
  24. Duckworth, A. L., & Eskreis-Winkler, L. (2015). Grit. In J. D. Wright(Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 397-401). Elsevier.
  25. Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Situationalstrategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Sci-ence, 11, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247
  26. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
  27. Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Jour-nal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/0223890802634290
  28. Durak, H. Y. (2020). Cyberloafing in learning environments where online social networking sites are used as learningtools: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Educa-tional Computing Research, 58(3), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867766
  29. Erkoç, B., İsmayilov, S., & Bayraktar, D. M. (2024). Öğretmen aday-larının siber aylaklık ve bilişsel kapılma düzeylerinin incelen-mesi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 14(2), 676-690.
  30. Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Survivor mission: Do those who survive have a drive to thrive at work? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.888579
  31. Eyuboğlu, E., Yavaş, Ö., Çelebi, M., Eser, M. C., Karakulak, İ., & Aslan, C. S. (2025). Sınıfta siber aylaklık: BESYO Öğrencileri ile niteliksel bir çalışma. Uluslararası Güncel Eğitim Araştır-maları Dergisi, 11(2), 364-363. https://doi.org/10.61087/Int-JCES.2025.51
  32. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  33. García, E. (2014). The need to address noncognitive skill in the ed-ucation policy agenda (EPI Briefing Paper No. 386). Economic Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-5913_3
  34. Gezgin, D., & Sarsar, F. (2020). BÖTE bölümünde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin siber aylaklık nedenlerine ait görüşleri: Bir karma yöntem çalışması. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(1), 243-256.
  35. Gökçearslan, Ş., & Erol Şahin, A. N. (2024). Sınıf dışı öğrenme et-kinliklerinde siber aylaklığın modellenmesi: Ekran süresi, içsel motivasyon, öz düzenleme ve çoklu görevin rolü. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 683698. https://doi.org/10.51119/ereegf.2024.102
  36. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). The implicit revolu-tion: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and un-conscious. American Psychologist, 72, 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000238
  37. Hadlington, L., & Parsons, K. (2017). Can cyberloafing and Inter-net addiction affect organizational information security? Cy-berpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(9), 567–571. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0239
  38. Heatherton, T. F., & Wagner, D. D. (2011). Cognitive neuroscienceof self-regulation failure. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.005
  39. Henze, N., & Zirkler, B. (1990). A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Communications in Statistics-Theo-ry and Methods, 19(10), 3595-3617.
  40. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-con-trol from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psycho-logical Science, 4, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x
  41. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equa-tion modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron-ic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  42. Huma, Z., Hussain, S., Thurasamy, R., & Malik, M. I. (2017). Deter-minants of cyberloafing: A comparative study of a public and private sector organization. Internet Research, 27(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2014-0317
  43. Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statis-tics, 5(3), 299-314.
  44. İlhan, A. G., & Önal, N. (2024). Öğretmen adaylarının siber aylaklık nedenleri: Dijital dünyada zaman yönetimi. Eğitimde Yeni Yak-laşımlar Dergisi, 7(2), 243-258.
  45. Jamaluddin, H., Ahmad, Z., & Wei, L. T. (2023). Exploring cyber-loafing as a coping mechanism in relation to job-related strain and outcomes: A study using the mediational model of stress. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), Article 2278209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2278209
  46. Jehanghir, M., Ishaq, K., & Akbar, R. A. (2024). Effect of learners’ autonomy on academic motivation and university students’grit. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4159–4196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11976-2
  47. Jiang, L., Zhang, S., Li, X., & Luo, F. (2023). How grit influences high school students’ academic performance and the mediation ef-fect of academic self-efficacy and cognitive learning strategies. Current Psychology, 42(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01306-x
  48. Jin, H., Wang, W., & Lan, X. (2019). Peer attachment and academ-ic procrastination in Chinese college students: A moderated mediation model of future time perspective and grit. Fron-tiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02645
  49. Kim, K. R., & Seo, E. H. (2015). The relationship between procras-tination and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 82, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.038
  50. Kim, S., & Christensen, A. L. (2017). The dark and bright sides of personal use of technology at work: A job demands–resourc-es model. Human Resource Development Review, 16(4), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317725438
  51. Kim, Y. E., Brady, A. C., & Wolters, C. A. (2018). Development and validation of the Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.010
  52. Kim, Y. J., & Lee, C. S. (2015). Effects of grit on the successful ag-ing of the elderly in Korea. Indian Journal of Science and Tech-nology, 8(S7), 373-378. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS7/70421
  53. Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In M. Williams (Ed.), Handbook of methodological innovation. Sage.
  54. Kline, R. B. (2012). Assumptions in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling(pp. 111-125). Guilford Press.
  55. Klingsieck, K. B. (2013). Procrastination: When good things don’t come to those who wait. European Psychologist, 18, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000138
  56. Koay, K. Y., & Soh, P. C. H. (2018). Should cyberloafing be al-lowed in the workplace? Human Resource Management In-ternational Digest, 26(7), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/HR-MID-05-2018-0107
  57. Kolemba, M., Konaszewski, K., & Niesiobedzka, M. (2024). Polish adaptation of Clark and Malecki’s academic grit scale. Current Psychology, 43(38), 30072–30080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06569-2
  58. Korkmaz, S., Göksülük, D., & Zararsız, G. (2014). MVN: An R pack-age for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6(2), 151-162.
  59. Kuś, J., & Korotusz, P. (2016). A virtual escape: A synthetic over-view of the literature concerning the phenomenon of cy-berloafing. Studia Psychologiczne, 54(3), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.2478/V1067-010-0158-7
  60. Kutluay, E., & Karaca, F. (2024). A model proposal explaining the influence of smartphone addiction related factors on high school students’ academic success. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12947-x
  61. LeDoux, J. E., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). The subjective experience of emotion: A fearful view. Current Opinion in Behavioral Scienc-es, 19, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.011
  62. Lilliefors, H. W. (1967). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for nor-mality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the Amer-ican Statistical Association, 62(318), 399-402.
  63. Lim, V. K. G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloaf-ing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Orga-nizational Behavior, 23(5), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161
  64. Lim, V. K. G., & Chen, D. J. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: Gain or drain on work? Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(4), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903353054
  65. Lim, V. K. G., & Teo, T. S. (2005). Prevalence, perceived serious-ness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 42(8), 1081–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.12.002
  66. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267–281.
  67. McCloskey, J. D. (2011). Finally, my thesis on academic procras-tination (Master›s thesis). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.(1506326)
  68. Nordby, K., Klingsieck, K. B., & Svartdal, F. (2017). Do procrastina-tion-friendly environments make students delay unnecessari-ly? Social Psychology of Education, 20, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9386-x
  69. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford UniversityPress.
  70. Polat, M. (2024). The smart phone cyberloafing scale in classes (spcsc): A scale adaptation study for university students. Social Sciences Studies Journal, 4(21), 3114-3127.
  71. Pychyl, T., Thibodeau, R., & Blunt, A. (2000). Five days of emo-tion: An experience sampling study of undergraduate student procrastination. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 239–254.
  72. Rebetez, M. M. L., Barsics, C., Rochat, L., D’Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2016). Procrastination, consideration of future consequences, and episodic future thinking. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.con-cog.2016.04.003
  73. Rimfeld, K., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2016). True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 780-789. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000089
  74. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative valid-ity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
  75. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.
  76. Sarıçam, H., & Erdemir, N. (2019). Determination of motivation regulation levels of university students: A scale adaptationstudy. IX. International Congress on Psychological Counselling and Guidance Research in Higher Education Proceedings Full Text Book, 233-241
  77. Sartori, R., Costantini, A., Ceschi, A., & Scalco, A. (2017). Not only correlations: A different approach for investigating the rela-tionship between the big five personality traits and job perfor-mance based on workers and employees’ perception. Quality & Quantity, 51, 2507-2519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0406-2
  78. Schechtman, N., DeBarger, A. H., Dornsife, C., Rosier, S., & Yarnall, L. (2013). Promoting grit, tenacity, and perseverance: Critical factors for success in the 21st century. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://pgbovine.net/OET-Draft-Grit-Report-2-17-13.pdf
  79. Schouwenburg, H. C., Lay, C. H., Pychyl, T. A., & Ferrari, J. R. (2004). Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings. American Psychological Association.
  80. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation and self-reg-ulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  81. Sheldon, K. M., Jose, P. E., Kashdan, T. B., & Jarden, A. (2015). Personality, effective goal-striving, and enhanced well-being: Comparing 10 candidate personality strengths. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 575-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215573211
  82. Sirois, F. M., & Kitner, R. (2015). Less adaptive or more maladap-tive? A meta-analytic investigation of procrastination and cop-ing. European Journal of Personality, 29, 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1985
  83. Sirois, F. M., & Pychyl, T. A. (2013). Procrastination and the prior-ity of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for futureself. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12011
  84. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analyt-ic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatoryfailure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
  85. Steel, P., Svartdal, F., Thundiyil, T., & Brothen, T. (2018). Examin-ing procrastination across multiple goal stages: A longitudinal study of temporal motivation theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00327
  86. Svartdal, F., Dahl, T. I., Gamst-Klaussen, T., Koppenborg, M., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2020). How study environments foster ac-ademic procrastination: overview and recommendations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:540910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.540910
  87. Svartdal, F., & Nemtcan, E. (2022). Past negative consequences of unnecessary delay as a marker of procrastination. Fron-tiers in Psychology, 13, 787337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787337
  88. Svartdal, F., & Steel, P. (2017). Irrational delay revisited: Examining five procrastination scales in a global sample. Frontiers in Psy-chology, 8:1927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01927
  89. Şahin, Y. L. (2020). Facebook kullanıcılarının akademik erteleme davranışları ile eğitsel ortamlardaki siber aylaklık durum-larının incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 629-666. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2020.21.01.017
  90. Tao, Y., Yu, H., Liu, M., Wang, P., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., & Xin, T. (2024). Procrastination and physical activity: The moderated mediating effect of grit. Journal of American College Health, 72(4), 1150–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2068962
  91. Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8, 454–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x
  92. Urbaczewski, A., & Jessup, L. M. (2003). Web browser, what’s that secret you’re keeping? Business Horizons, 46(5), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(03)00068-5
  93. Ürkmez, G. ve Olpak, Y.Z. (2025). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin dijital oyun bağımlılıklarının dijital oyun oynama motivasyonu ve akademik erteleme davranışı ile ilişkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(3), 910-929. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1754985
  94. Whitty, M. T., & Carr, A. N. (2006). New rules in the workplace: Applying object-relations theory to explain problem inter-net and email behaviour in the workplace. Computers in Hu-man Behavior, 22(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.005
  95. Wolters, C. A., & Hussain, M. (2015). Investigating grit and its relations with college students’ self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9128-9
  96. Xiao, F. (2024). Investigating the role of psychological capital in academic procrastination and adjustment among Chinese uni-versity students. American Journal of Health Behavior, 48(3), 864–876. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.48.3.25
  97. Yeşiltaş, M. D. (2020). Akademik motivasyon ve genel erteleme davranışının öğrencilerin akademik erteleme davranışı üze-rindeki rolü. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 123-133.
  98. Yockey, R. D. (2016). Validation of the Short Form of the academic procrastination scale. Psychological Reports, 118(1), 171-179.
  99. Yu, Y., Hua, L., Feng, X., Wang, Y., Yu, Z., Zi, T., Zhao, Y., & Li, J. (2021). True grit in learning math: The math anxiety-achieve-ment link is mediated by math-specific grit. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 645793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645793
  100. Yurtseven, N., & Doğan, S. (2019). Structural relationships among academic procrastination, academic motivation, and prob-lem solving skill in prep class college Students. Pegem Jour-nal of Education and Instruction, 9(3), 849-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.027
  101. Zhao, W., Shi, X., Jin, M., Li, Y., Liang, C., Ji, Y., Cao, J., Oubibi, M., Li, X., & Tian, Y. (2024). The impact of a growth mindset on high school students’ learning subjective well-being: The serial mediation role of achievement motivation and grit. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1399343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1399343
  102. Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., Tacoronte, D. V., & Ding, J. M. T. (2006). Do current anti-cyberloafing disciplinary prac-tices have a replica in research findings? A study of the effects of coercive strategies on workplace internet mis-use. Internet Research, 16(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240610690052