KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 23

Maritime Supply Chain Security Gaps of Middle Powers

Oğuzhan Türedi
Hakkı Kişi
Sayfa
103–136
Yayın Tarihi
2016-04-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Third group of security gaps need the middle power vision regarding maritime supply chain security.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper aims to find out the maritime supply chain security gaps that middle powers might encounter by comparing the maritime supply chain security of the dominant power, the US, and the middle power, Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To accomplish this benchmarking, the Two Axes Multi-Sector (TAMS) model that enabled the multi-layered based security analysis throughout the two flows -cargo flow and transit flow- running in the logistics channel is introduced.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Third group of security gaps need the middle power vision regarding maritime supply chain security.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:SCS (Supply Chain Security) · security initiatives · TAMS (Two Axes Multi-Sector) model

Özet

This paper aims to find out the maritime supply chain security gaps that middle powers might encounter by comparing the maritime supply chain security of the dominant power, the US, and the middle power, Turkey. To accomplish this benchmarking, the Two Axes Multi-Sector (TAMS) model that enabled the multi-layered based security analysis throughout the two flows -cargo flow and transit flow- running in the logistics channel is introduced. As a result of the comparison with the TAMS model, the maritime supply chain security gaps of the middle powers can be divided into three distinct categories. First group of security gaps need the efforts of the international organizations to be overcome. Second group of security gaps need grants and funds from the dominant power or international organizations to be overcome. Third group of security gaps need the middle power vision regarding maritime supply chain security.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Türedi, O., Kişi, H. (2016). Maritime Supply Chain Security Gaps of Middle Powers. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 23, 103–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/1209109

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (30)

  1. BICHOU Khalid, “Review of Port Performance Approaches and a Supply Chain Framework to Port Performance Benchmarking”, Mary R. Brooks and Kevin Cullinane, (ed.), Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance, Research in Transportation Economics, Volume 17, JAI Press, the Netherlands, 2007.
  2. BICHOU Khalid and EVANS Andrew, “Maritime Security and Regulatory Risk-Based Models: Review and Critical Analysis”, Khalid Bichou, Michael G.H. Bell and Andrew Evans, (ed.), Risk Management in Port Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Security, Informa Law, New York, NY, 2007.
  3. COOK Thomas A., Managing Global Supply Chains: Compliance, Security, and Dealing with Terrorism, Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, FL., 2008.
  4. GREWAL Devinder, “International Ship Safety Regulations”, Wayne K. Talley, (ed.), Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, Informa, London, 2008.
  5. HANSEN Hans T., “Distinction in the Finer Shades of Gray: The ‘Four Circles Model’ for Maritime Security Threat Assessment”, Rupert Herbert-Burns, Sam.
  6. KUGLER Jacek and TAMMEN Ronald L., “Regional Challenge: China’s Rise to Power”, Jim Rolfe, (ed.), The Asia-Pacific: A Region in Transition, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, HI, 2004.
  7. LEMKE Douglas and KUGLER Jacek, “The Evolution of the Power Transition Perspective”, Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke, (ed.), Parity and War: Evolutions and Extensions of the War Ledger, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1996.
  8. MURPHY Martin N., “Lifeline or Pipedream? Origins, Purposes, and Benefits of Automatic Identification System, Long-Range Identification and Tracking, and Maritime Domain Awareness”, Rupert Herbert-Burns, Sam Bateman, Peter Lehr, (ed.), Lloyd’s MIU Handbook of Maritime Security, CRC Press, London, 2008.
  9. ORGANSKI A.F. Kenneth, World Politics, Knopf, New York, NY, 1968.
  10. ORGANSKI A.F. Kenneth and KUGLER Jacek, The War Ledger, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 1980.
  11. PALLIS Athanasios A. and VAGGELAS George K., “EU Port and Shipping Security”, Wayne K. Talley, (ed.), Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, Informa, London, 2008.
  12. PEGG Russell, “Maritime Forces and Security of Merchant Shipping in the Mediterranean Sea and Northern Indian Ocean”, Rupert Herbert-Burns, Sam Bateman, Peter Lehr, (ed.), Lloyd’s MIU Handbook of Maritime Security, CRC Press, London, 2008.
  13. PINTO C. Ariel, et. al., “US Port Security”, Wayne K. Talley, (ed.), Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, Informa, London, 2008.
  14. RAHMAN Chris, “Evolving U.S. Framework for Global Maritime Security from 9/11 to the 1000-ship Navy”, Rupert Herbert-Burns, Sam Bateman, Peter Lehr, (ed.), Lloyd’s MIU Handbook of Maritime Security, CRC Press, London, 2008.
  15. TAMMEN Ronald L., LEMKE Douglas, ALSHARABATI Carole, EFIRD Brian, KUGLER Jacek, STAM III Allan C., ABDOLLAHIAN Mark A. and ORGANSKI, A.F. Kenneth, Power Transitions: Strategies for The 21st Century, Chatham House, New York, NY, 2000.
  16. WILLIS Henry H. and ORTIZ David S., Evaluating The Security Of The Global Containerized Supply Chain, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA., 2004.
  17. BANOMYONG Ruth, “The Impact of Port and Trade Security Initiatives on Maritime Supply-Chain Management” Maritime Policy and Management, 2005, Vol. 32, No. 1.
  18. BICHOU Khalid, “Security and Risk-Based Models in Shipping and Ports: Review and Critical Analysis” discussion paper no. 2008-20, the OECD/ITF Round Table of 11-12 December 2008 on Security, Risk Perception and Cost-Benefit Analysis, 2008.
  19. MARLOW Peter B., “Maritime Security: An Update of Key Issues” Maritime Policy and Management, 2010, Vol. 37, No. 7.
  20. METAPARTI Prakash, “Rhetoric, Rationality and Reality in Post-9/11 Maritime Security”, Maritime Policy and Management, 2010, Vol. 37, No. 7.
  21. THAI Vinh V., “Effective Maritime Security: Conceptual Model and Emprical Evidence” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2009.
  22. (Semi-)Official Contemporary Documents OECD, Security in Maritime Transport: Risk Factors and Economic Impact, OECD, Paris, 2003.
  23. UNITED Nations (UN), UN Convention on the Law of The Sea of 1982 (UNCLOS), 1982.
  24. US Department of Homeland Security, International Outreach and Coordination Strategy, 2005a.
  25. US Department of Homeland Security, The National Strategy for Maritime Security, 2005b.
  26. US Department of Homeland Security, International Outreach and Coordination Strategy, 2005c.
  27. US Department of Homeland Security, Strategy to Enhance International Supply Chain Security, 2007
  28. US Department of Homeland Security, Small Vessel Security Strategy, 2008.
  29. US Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Systems Sector Specific Plan: An Annex to the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, 2010.
  30. US Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Requesters: Supply Chain Security- DHS Could Improve Cargo Security by Periodically Assessing Risks from Foreign Ports, 2013.