Turkish Terrorism Studies: A Preliminary Assessment

Kaynakça (11)

1. Ackerman, Gary A., and Lauren E. Pinson. “Speaking Truth to Sources: Introducing a Method for the Quantitative Evaluation of Open Sources in Event Data.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39, nos. 7-8 (2016): 617-40.
2. Aydınlı, Ersel, Erol Kurubaş, and Haluk Özdemir. Yöntem, Kuram, Komplo: Türk Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Vizyon Arayışları. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 2009.
3. Crenshaw, Martha. “Current Research on Terrorism: The Academic Perspective.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 15, no. 1 (1992): 1-11. ———. “The Psychology of Terrorism: An Agenda for the 21st Century.” Political Psychology 21, no. 2 (2000): 405-20.
4. Creswell, John W., and Dana L. Miller. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39, no. 3 (2000): 124-30.
5. Crozier, Brian. The Rebels. London: Chatto and Windus, 1960.
6. Demir, Cenker Korhan. Sebeplerinden Mücadele Yöntemlerine Etnik Ayrılıkçı Terörizmin Analizi: PIRA, ETA, PKK. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2017.
7. Freedman, Benjamin. “Terrorism Research Centres: 100 Institutes, Programs and Organisations in the Field of Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, Radicalisation and Asymmetric Warfare Studies.” Perspectives on Terrorism 4, no. 5 (2010). Accessed May 13, 2016. http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/123/html.
8. Gordon, Avishag. “Can Terrorism Become a Scientific Discipline? A Diagnostic Study.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 3, no. 3 (2010): 437-58. ———. “Terrorism as an Academic Subject after 9/11: Searching the Internet Reveals a Stockholm Syndrome Trend.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 28, no. 1 (2005): 45-59. ———. “Terrorism and Knowledge Growth: A Databases and Internet Analysis.” In Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures, edited by Andrew Silke, 104-18. London: Frank Cass, 2004. ———. “Terrorism and the Scholarly Communication System.” Terrorism and Political Violence 13, no. 4 (2001): 116-24. ———. “Transient and Continuant Authors in a Research Field: The Case of Terrorism.” Scientometrics 72, no. 2 (2007): 213-24.
9. Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. “How May Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006): 59-82.
10. Gurr, Ted Robert. “Empirical Research on Political Terrorism: The State of the Art and How It Might Be Improved.” In Current Perspectives on International Terrorism, edited by R.O. Slater and Michael Stohl, 115-54. London: Macmillan, 1988.
11. Gürbüz, Sait, and Faruk Şahin. Sosyal Bilimler