Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 2

The Politics of the National Pact (Misak-ı Millî): Cartographic Anxiety in Turkish Foreign Policy

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-22
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

While constituting a historical narrative that demonstrates anxiety about borders in Turkish foreign policy, the National Pact also articulates a vision of Turkey’s geo-body, implying that it draws a specific territorial shape as well as creates criteria for the body politic.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article aims to examine the meaning of the historical concept of the National Pact (Misak-ı Millî) in Turkish foreign policy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It argues that although the National Pact is now more than a hundred years old, it has still been widely used and referred to in both domestic and foreign policy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:While constituting a historical narrative that demonstrates anxiety about borders in Turkish foreign policy, the National Pact also articulates a vision of Turkey’s geo-body, implying that it draws a specific territorial shape as well as creates criteria for the body politic.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:The National Pact · Misak-ı Millî · Turkish foreign policy

Abstract

This article aims to examine the meaning of the historical concept of the National Pact (Misak-ı Millî) in Turkish foreign policy. It argues that although the National Pact is now more than a hundred years old, it has still been widely used and referred to in both domestic and foreign policy. In this regard, it suggests that it has usually formed a legitimizing background for Turkey’s foreign policy stance especially in relation to its boundaries. However, the article also shows that as the document was contentious from the start, with no clearly defined boundaries, it has transformed throughout the century based on the necessities of Turkish foreign policy. This study emphasizes that the politics of the National Pact reflect Turkey’s cartographic anxiety, encompassing both territorial fear and ambition, sometimes experienced simultaneously. While constituting a historical narrative that demonstrates anxiety about borders in Turkish foreign policy, the National Pact also articulates a vision of Turkey’s geo-body, implying that it draws a specific territorial shape as well as creates criteria for the body politic.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Papuççular, H. (2026). The Politics of the National Pact (Misak-ı Millî): Cartographic Anxiety in Turkish Foreign Policy. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Volume: 15 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1974803

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (59)

  1. Adisonmez, U. C., & Onursal, R. (2022). “Strong, but anxious state”: The fantasmatic narratives on ontological insecurity and anxiety in Turkey. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 19(73), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1094402
  2. Akyol, T., Kaplan, S. (2014). Açık ve gizli oturumlarda Lozan tartışmaları: TBMM’de Lozan müzakereleri tutanakları. Doğan Kitap.
  3. Alkan, H. (Ed.). (2021). Bir asrı geçen birikimiyle Misak ı Milli’ye yeniden bakmak. TBMM Yayınları.
  4. Ataman, M. (2003). Özalist dış politika: Aktif ve rasyonel bir anlayış. Bilgi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 49–64.
  5. Atay, F. R. (1993). Zeytindağı. Remzi Kitabevi.
  6. Aydemir, Ş. S. (2019). Suyu arayan adam. Remzi Kitabevi.
  7. Bahçeli’nin on iki ada çıkışı Yunan’ı panikletti. (2025, January 14). Yeni Şafak. https://www.yenisafak.com/dunya/bahcelinin-on-iki-ada-cikisi-yunani-panikletti-4669993.
  8. Bakır, T. (2022). Demokrat Parti dönemi Türkiye–Irak ilişkilerinde A.B.D. etkisi (1950–1960) [Unpublished MA Thesis, Hacettepe University].
  9. Balcı, A. (2021). Türkiye dış politikası: İlkeler, aktörler ve uygulamalar. Nesil Yayıncılık.
  10. Barlas, D. (2004). Friends or foes? Diplomatic relations between Italy and Turkey, 1923–1936. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 36(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743804362045
  11. Batuman, B. (2010). The shape of the nation: Visual production of nationalism through maps in Turkey. Political Geography, 29(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.05.002
  12. Billé, F. (2017). Introduction to “Cartographic Anxieties”. Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review 6(1), 1-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ach.2017.0000
  13. Black, J. (1997). Maps and politics. Reaktion Books.
  14. Budak, M. (1998). Hangi Misak‑ı Millî? Yeni Türkiye, 1(23–24), 114–121.
  15. Callahan, W. A. (2009). The cartography of national humiliation and the emergence of China’s geobody. Public Culture, 21(1), 141–173. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2008-024.
  16. Collins‑Kreiner, N., Mansfeld, Y., Kliot, N. (2006). The reflection of a political conflict in mapping: The case of Israel’s borders and frontiers. Middle Eastern Studies, 42(3), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200500521230
  17. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan 28. kez muhtarları ağırladı. (2016, October 19). Sabah. https://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2016/10/19/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-28-kez-muhtarlari-agirladi
  18. Demirel alarm verdi. (1995, May 2). Yeni Yüzyıl.p.1
  19. Erdoğan: İdlib’de Afrin’de yapılan Misak‑ı Milli’dir. (2017, November 10). Gazete Duvar. https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/politika/2017/11/10/erdogan-milletin-mustafaya-sorunu-yok
  20. Erdoğan: Misak‑ı Milli hedeflerimizi koruyamadık. (2016, October 19). Bianet. https://bianet.org/haber/erdogan-misak-i-milli-hedeflerimizi-koruyamadik-179779
  21. Ermihan, E., Karamık, İ. (2025). Causal mechanisms of ontological (in)security in Turkish politics and foreign policy: Anxiety transmittance from Sèvres to Lausanne. Turkish Studies, 26(3), 535–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2025.2461083
  22. Goloğlu, H. M. (2008). Milli mücadele tarihi –I, Erzurum kongresi. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  23. Görmüş, Alper. (2024, December 9). İnönü’nün Ecevit’e vasiyeti. Serbestiyet. https://serbestiyet.com/gunun-yazilari/inonunun-ecevite-vasiyeti-sartlar-elverdiginde-turkiyenin-musulu-topraklarina-katmasi-uygun-ve-gerekli-olacaktir-bunu-hatirindan-cikarma-190192/
  24. Gregory, D. (1994). Geographical imaginations. Blackwell.
  25. Gulmez, S. B. (2017). Turkish foreign policy as an anomaly: Revisionism and irredentism through diplomacy in the 1930s. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 44(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2016.1177487
  26. Jones, R. (2012). Political geography and national boundaries. In J. P. Stoltman (Ed.), 21st century geography: A reference handbook (pp. 161–170). SAGE Publications.
  27. Kalyoncuoğlu, K. (2019, January 27). Misak ı Milli’nin güney sınırı belgelere yansıdı. Anadolu Ajansı. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/misakimillinin-guney-sinirlari-belgelere-yansidi/1376163
  28. Krishna, S. (1994). Cartographic anxiety: Mapping the body politic in India. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 19(4), 507–521.
  29. Mehmetcik, H., & Çelik, A. C. (2022). The militarization of Turkish foreign policy. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 24(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2021.1992190
  30. Millet Meclisi Tutanak Dergisi. (1966, January 7). Dönem 2, Cilt 2, Birleşim 32.
  31. Millet Meclisi Tutanak Dergisi. (1969, January 23). Dönem 2, Cilt 31, Birleşim 35.
  32. Misak‑ı Milli haritası. (2023, December 13). Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=misak-%C4%B1+milli&title=Special%3AMediaSearch&type=image
  33. Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113
  34. Özdil, O., Babuçoğlu M., Gürlek, S. (2021). Kuruluş safhasında belgelerle Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Belgeler – Fotoğraflar. TBMM Basımevi.
  35. Özer, V. (2016, November 1). Özal Musul’a girecek miydi? Hürriyet. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/verda-ozer/ozal-musula-girecek-miydi-40264656
  36. Özkan, B. (2015). Making Cyprus a national cause in Turkey’s foreign policy, 1948–1965. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 15(4), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2015.1033292
  37. Özkan, B. (2018). Türkiye’de milli vatan’ın inşası: Dar’ul İslam’dan Türk vatanına. Kırmızı Kedi Yayınevi.
  38. Papuççular, H. (2019). Türkiye ve Oniki Ada, 1912–1947. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  39. Papuççular, H. (2020). The Sanjak of Alexandretta (Hatay) in Turkish Foreign Policy: A Case of “Accidental Diaspora” and Kin-State Politics. In H. Papuççular, D. Kuru (Eds.) A Transnational Account of Turkish Foreign Policy (pp. 121-140). Palgrave Macmillan.
  40. Papuççular, H. (2023). Cumhuriyet’in dış politikası: Olaylar, aktörler, kurumlar 1923–2023. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  41. Rumelili, B. (2024). Foreign policy in the age of anxiety: An existentialist perspective on post‑2016 Turkish foreign policy. In N. A. Yurdusev, M. Doğrul (Eds.), Global transformations and Türkiye (pp. 257–268). Turkish Academy of Sciences.
  42. Saxer, M. (2017). A spectacle of maps: Cartographic hopes and anxieties in the Pamirs. Cross‑Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review, 6(1), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1353/ach.2017.0005
  43. Sazak, D. (2002, 6 January) İşte Musul–Kerkük sırrı. Milliyet. https://www.milliyet.com.tr/siyaset/iste-musul-kerkuk-sirri-5228761.
  44. Short, J. R. (2022). The rise and fall of the national atlas in the twentieth century: Power, state and territory. Anthem Press.
  45. Soleimani, K., & Shojai, B. (2025). Kurdish paradox of statelessness: Öcalan’s confederalism and Turkeyification strategies. Palgrave Macmillan.
  46. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Devlet Arşivler Başkanlığı. Türk Diplomatik Arşivi (1951, April 20). Suriye Komünist Partisinin Halep`te dağıttığı beyanname. (35723‑141016‑178).
  47. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı. Türk Diplomatik Arşivi. (1945, October 8). Yunanistan ile Türkiye arasında boğazlar ve Gökçeada ve Bozcaada konuları. (68014‑297283‑115).
  48. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı, Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı. Türk Diplomatik Arşivi. (1939, January 20). İtalya ve Fransa`nın İspanya iç savaşı karşısındaki tutumları, İtalya Dışişleri Bakanının Yugoslavya ziyareti ve Türkiye`nin Halep`i alacağı yönünde çıkan iddialar. (44758‑215616‑58).
  49. TBMM Tutanak Dergisi. (1990, September 5). Gizli oturum, Dönem 18, Birleşim 3, Oturum 2.
  50. The Archives of the League of Nations. (1924, September 15). Memorandum du gouvernement turc sur la frontière entre la Turquie et l’Iraq (No. C.494.1924.VII).
  51. Türk Tarih Kurumu. (2020, December 6). Misak‑ı Millî beyannamesi. https://ttk.gov.tr/misak-i-milli-beyannamesi/
  52. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. (1947, 28 February). The Hatay question (Document No. CIA‑RDP78‑01617A002800180004‑8).
  53. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. (1951, 20 March). Radio Moscow’s use of the “Greater Turkey” theme (Document No. CIA‑RDP78‑04864A000200060008‑5).
  54. Uyar, H. (2023). İkinci Meclis’te “Lozan’a hayır” diyen milletvekilleri ve siyasi akıbetleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen‑Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Cumhuriyet’in 100. Yılı Özel Sayısı, 155–170.
  55. Uzgel, İ. (1998). Türk dış politikasında sivilleşme ve demokratikleşme sorunları: Körfez Savaşı örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 53(1), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000001956
  56. Winichakul, T. (1994). Siam mapped: A history of a geo‑body of a nation. University of Hawai‘i Press.
  57. Yavuz, H. (2020). Nostalgia for the empire: The politics of neo‑Ottomanism. Oxford University Press.
  58. Yaycı, C. (2022). Mavi vatan, bir harita ve bir doktrin kitabı: Türkiye’nin denizlerdeki Misak‑ı Milli’si. İstanbul Üniversitesi Press.
  59. Yegen, M. (2022). Ethnopolitics to geopolitics: The Turkish state and the Kurdish question since 2015. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 50(4), 943–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2022.2043146