Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Turkish Terrorism Studies: A Preliminary Assessment

Pages
21–44
Publication Date
2017-06-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turkish terrorism studies · academic discipline · methodology

Abstract

This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish

🔖

Cite This Article

Demir, C. K., Avcı, E. (2017). Turkish Terrorism Studies: A Preliminary Assessment. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 21–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/119711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ackerman, Gary A., and Lauren E. Pinson. “Speaking Truth to Sources: Introducing a Method for the Quantitative Evaluation of Open Sources in Event Data.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39, nos. 7-8 (2016): 617-40.
  2. Aydınlı, Ersel, Erol Kurubaş, and Haluk Özdemir. Yöntem, Kuram, Komplo: Türk Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Vizyon Arayışları. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 2009.
  3. Crenshaw, Martha. “Current Research on Terrorism: The Academic Perspective.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 15, no. 1 (1992): 1-11. ———. “The Psychology of Terrorism: An Agenda for the 21st Century.” Political Psychology 21, no. 2 (2000): 405-20.
  4. Creswell, John W., and Dana L. Miller. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39, no. 3 (2000): 124-30.
  5. Crozier, Brian. The Rebels. London: Chatto and Windus, 1960.
  6. Demir, Cenker Korhan. Sebeplerinden Mücadele Yöntemlerine Etnik Ayrılıkçı Terörizmin Analizi: PIRA, ETA, PKK. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2017.
  7. Freedman, Benjamin. “Terrorism Research Centres: 100 Institutes, Programs and Organisations in the Field of Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, Radicalisation and Asymmetric Warfare Studies.” Perspectives on Terrorism 4, no. 5 (2010). Accessed May 13, 2016. http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/123/html.
  8. Gordon, Avishag. “Can Terrorism Become a Scientific Discipline? A Diagnostic Study.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 3, no. 3 (2010): 437-58. ———. “Terrorism as an Academic Subject after 9/11: Searching the Internet Reveals a Stockholm Syndrome Trend.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 28, no. 1 (2005): 45-59. ———. “Terrorism and Knowledge Growth: A Databases and Internet Analysis.” In Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures, edited by Andrew Silke, 104-18. London: Frank Cass, 2004. ———. “Terrorism and the Scholarly Communication System.” Terrorism and Political Violence 13, no. 4 (2001): 116-24. ———. “Transient and Continuant Authors in a Research Field: The Case of Terrorism.” Scientometrics 72, no. 2 (2007): 213-24.
  9. Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. “How May Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006): 59-82.
  10. Gurr, Ted Robert. “Empirical Research on Political Terrorism: The State of the Art and How It Might Be Improved.” In Current Perspectives on International Terrorism, edited by R.O. Slater and Michael Stohl, 115-54. London: Macmillan, 1988.
  11. Gürbüz, Sait, and Faruk Şahin. Sosyal Bilimler