KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sosyoekonomi / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 17

e-Devlet Projelerinin Yönetilmesi: PolNet Projesi Örneği

İlker Pekgözlü
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2012-06-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Daha sonra çalışma, Türkiye’de ilk kamu BT projelerinden birisi olan PolNet Projesi’nde çalışmış olan uzmanlarla yapılan görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler ve dokümanları incelemektedir .

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Proje yönetimi e-devlet uygulamalarında çok önemli bir rol oynamaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışma öncelikle bu üç faktörü tartışmakta ve farklı ülkelerdeki iki kamu bilgi teknolojisi (BT) projesinin problemlerini ele almaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Daha sonra çalışma, Türkiye’de ilk kamu BT projelerinden birisi olan PolNet Projesi’nde çalışmış olan uzmanlarla yapılan görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler ve dokümanları incelemektedir .
🔬Tür:Makale
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Proje yönetimi e-devlet uygulamalarında çok önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Her ne kadar kategorize edilmesi kolay olmasa da e-devlet projeleri proje yönetimine ait beş başlık altında incelenebilir. Örgütsel ve yönetsel kategori üzerine olan araştırma, proje yönetiminde planlama, iletişim ve liderliğin önemine vurgu yapmaktadır. Bu çalışma öncelikle bu üç faktörü tartışmakta ve farklı ülkelerdeki iki kamu bilgi teknolojisi (BT) projesinin problemlerini ele almaktadır. Daha sonra çalışma, Türkiye’de ilk kamu BT projelerinden birisi olan PolNet Projesi’nde çalışmış olan uzmanlarla yapılan görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler ve dokümanları incelemektedir .

Abstract

Proje yönetimi e-devlet uygulamalarında çok önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Her ne kadar kategorize edilmesi kolay olmasa da e-devlet projeleri proje yönetimine ait beş başlık altında incelenebilir. Örgütsel ve yönetsel kategori üzerine olan araştırma, proje yönetiminde planlama, iletişim ve liderliğin önemine vurgu yapmaktadır. Bu çalışma öncelikle bu üç faktörü tartışmakta ve farklı ülkelerdeki iki kamu bilgi teknolojisi (BT) projesinin problemlerini ele almaktadır. Daha sonra çalışma, Türkiye’de ilk kamu BT projelerinden birisi olan PolNet Projesi’nde çalışmış olan uzmanlarla yapılan görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler ve dokümanları incelemektedir .

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Pekgözlü, İ. (2012). e-Devlet Projelerinin Yönetilmesi: PolNet Projesi Örneği. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 17. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.78159

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (73)

  1. Angelides, D.C. (1999), “Project Management and Good Technical and Business Practices”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 15(3), 78–88.
  2. Bainey, K.R. (2004), Integrated IT Project Management: A Model-centric Approach, Norwood, MA: Artech House.
  3. Bajjaly, S.T. (1999), “Managing Emerging Information Systems in the Public Sector”, Public Performance and Management Review, 23(1), 40–47.
  4. Barki, H., S. Rivard ve J. Talbot (1993), “Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 203–23.
  5. Barret, K. ve R. Green (2001), Powering Up: How Public Managers Can Take Control of Information Technology, Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  6. Baştan, S. ve R. Gökbunar (2004), “Kamu Hizmetlerinin Sunumunda e-Devletle İlgili Yeni Gelişmeler: Tümleşik e-Devlet Sistemlerine Doğru”, D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 19(1), 71–89.
  7. Bellamy, C. (2000), “The Politics of Public Information Systems”, G.D. Garson (der.), Handbook of Public Information Systems, New York: Marcel Dekker.
  8. Best, J.D. (1997), The Ditigal Organization, New York: Wiley.
  9. Bozeman, B. ve S. Bretschneider (1986), “Public Management Information Systems: Theory and Prescriptions” [Special issue], Public Administration Review, 46, 475–87.
  10. Bretschneider, S. (1990), “Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An Empirical Test”, Public Administration Review, 50(5), 536–45.
  11. Brown, M.M. (2000), “Mitigating the Risk of Information Technology Initiatives: Best Practices and Points of Failure for the Public Sector”, G.D. Garson (der.), Handbook of Public Information Systems, New York: Marcel Dekker.
  12. Brown, M.M. (2001), “The Benefits and Costs of Information Technology Innovations: An Empirical Assessment of a Local Government Agency”, Public Performance and Management Review, 24(4), 351–66.
  13. Brown, M.M. ve J.L. Brudney (2003), “Learning Organizations in the Public Sector? A Study of Police Agencies Employing Information and Technology to Advance Knowledge”, Public Administration Review, 63(1), 30–43.
  14. Caffrey, L. (1998), Information Sharing between and within Governments: A Study Group Report. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
  15. Cats-Baril, W. ve R. Thompson (1995), “Managing Information Technology Projects in the Public Sector”, Public Administration Review, 55(6), 559–566.
  16. Chengalur-Smith, I. ve P. Duchessi (1999), “The Initiation and Adoption of Client–Server Technology in Organizations”, Information and Management, 35, 77–88.
  17. Cleland, D.I. (1994), Project Management: Strategic Design and Implementation (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw Hill.
  18. Dalcher, D. ve A. Genus (2003), “Introduction: Avoiding IS/IT Implementation Failure”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(4), 403–407.
  19. Davis, K. ve J.W. Newstrom (1989), Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior (8th ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
  20. Dawes, S.S. ve M.R. Nelson (1995), Pool the Risks, Share the Benefits: Partnerships in IT Innovation, J. Keyes (der.), Technology Trendlines. Technology Success Stories from Today's Visionaries, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  21. Dawes, S.S. ve T. Pardo (2002), Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems, W. J. McIver ve A. K. Elmagarmid (der.), Advances in Digital Government. Technology, Human Factors, and Policy, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  22. Dmytrenko, A.L. (1996), “Successful Project Management”, Records Management Quarterly, 30(1), 74–75.
  23. Drucker, P.F. (1950), The New Society: The Anatomy of Industrial Order, New York: Harper and Brothers.
  24. Edmiston, K.D. (2003), “State and Local e-government: Prospects and Challenges”, American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 20–45.
  25. EGM Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı (1988), Polis Bilgisayar Ağı Projesi Olurluk Raporu (Yayımlanmamış Proje Raporu), Ankara.
  26. EGM Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı (1996), Polis Bilgisayar Ağı 1996–2000 Yılları Mimari Yapısı ve Uygulama Evreleri (Yayımlanmamış Değerlendirme Raporu), Ankara.
  27. Fiedler, F.E. (1967), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, New York: McGraw Hill.
  28. Gagnon, Y.C. (2001), “The Behavior of Public Managers in Adopting New Technologies”, Public Performance and Management Review, 24(4), 337–350.
  29. Gannon, A. (1994), “Project Management: An Approach to Accomplishing Things”, Records Management Quarterly, 28(3), 3–12.
  30. Garson, G.D. (2003), Toward an Information Technology Research Agenda for Public Administration, G. D. Garson (der.), Public Information Technology: Policy and Management Issues, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  31. Genus, A., A. Rigakis ve K. Dickson (2003), “Managing Large-scale IT Projects: The Case of National Air Traffic Services’ New En Route Centre at Swanwick”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(4), 491-503.
  32. Gil-Garcia, J.R. ve T.A. Pardo (2005), “e-Government Success Factors: Mapping Practical Tools to Theoretical Foundations”, Government Information Quarterly, 22, 187–216.
  33. Greenberg, J. ve R.A. Baron (2003), Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work (8th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  34. Heeks, R. (2003), “Most e-Government-for-Development Projects Fail. How Can Risks be Reduced?”, Institute for Development Policy and Management,, 26.07.2010.
  35. Hersey, P., K.H. Blanchard ve D.E. Johnson (1996), Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (7th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  36. Jiang, J. ve G. Klein (2000), “Software Development Risks to Project Effectiveness”, The Journal of Systems and Software, 52, 3–10.
  37. Kesner, R.M. (2004), The Hands-on Project Office: Guaranteeing ROI and On-time Delivery, Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications.
  38. Kerzner, H. (1982), Project Management for Executives, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
  39. Kim, S. ve D. Kim, (2003), “South Korean Public Officials' Perceptions of Values, Failure, and Consequences of Failure in e-Government Leadership”, Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 360–375.
  40. Kliem, R.L. ve I.S. Ludin (1992), The People Side of Project Management, Brookfield, VT: Gower.
  41. Knorr, E. (2005), “How the FBI Blew it”, InfoWorld, 27(12), 45–48.
  42. Landsbergen, D.J. ve G. Wolken Jr. (2001), “Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology”, Public Administration Review, 61(2), 206–220.
  43. Lewis, J.P. (2002), Fundamentals of Project Management (2nd. ed.), New York: AMACOM.
  44. Lippitt, G.L. (1978), Transition Management-coping, R.T. Golembiewski ve W.B. Eddy (der.), Organization Development in Public Administration: Part1, New York: Marcel Dekker.
  45. MacInnis, P. (2005), “The Business of Analyzing Project Success”, Computing Canada, 31(5), 34.
  46. Mahler, J. ve P.M. Regan (2003), “Developing Intranets for Agency Management”, Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 422–432.
  47. McKean, K. (2005), “Born to Lose?”, InfoWorld, 27(12),6.
  48. Melitski, J. (2003), “Capacity and e-Government Performance: An Analysis Based on Early Adopters of Internet Technologies in New Jersey”, Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 376–390.
  49. Merriam, S.B. (2002), Introduction to Qualitative Research, S.B. Merriam vd. (der.), Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  50. Millett, J.D. (1954), Management in the Public Service: The Quest for Effective Performance, New York: McGraw Hill.
  51. Moder, J.J. (1983), Network Techniques in Project Management, D.I. Cleland ve W.R. King (der.), Project Management Handbook, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
  52. Morton, G.H.A. (1983), Human Dynamics in Project Planning, D.I. Cleland ve W.R. King (der.), Project Management Handbook, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
  53. Odabaş, H. ve C. Polat (2008), e-Devlet Bilişim Sistemlerinde Kurumsal Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi, E. Bilar ve Y. Ekinci (der.), Balkan Ülkeleri Kütüphaneler Arası Bilgi-Belge Yönetimi ve İşbirliği Sempozyumu (2008-Edirne), Edirne: Trakya Üniversitesi, 236–246.
  54. Pekgözlü, İ. (2003), Türk Emniyet Örgütü’nde Bilgi Teknolojilerinin Uygulanması, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Universitesi, Ankara.
  55. Pekgözlü, İ. (2009), Implementation Stages of Information Technologies in Policing: A Case Study of Turkish National Police, T.K. Bensghir (der.), eTransformation in Public Administration: From eGovernment to eGovernance, Ankara: TODAİE Presswork, 509–515.
  56. Penner, (1994), The Project Manager’s Survival Guide: The Handbook for Real-world Project Management, Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute.
  57. Reddick, C.G. ve H.A. Frank (2007), “The Perceived Impacts of e-Government on U.S. Cities: A Survey of Florida and Texas City Managers”, Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 576−594.
  58. Richman, L. (2002), Project Management Step-by-step, New York: AMACOM.
  59. Rocheleau, B. (2003), Politics, Accountability, and Government Information Systems, G.D. Garson (der.), Public Information Technology: Policy and Management Issues, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  60. Rockey, E.H. (1977), Communicating in Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.
  61. Smith, L.D., J.F. Campbell, A. Subramanian, D.A. Bird ve A.C. Nelson (2001), “Strategic Planning for Municipal Information Systems: Some Lessons from a Large U.S. City”, American Review of Public Administration, 31(2), 139–157.
  62. Southon, G., C. Sauer ve K. Dampney (1999), “Lessons from a Failed Information Systems Initiative: Issues for Complex Organizations”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 55 (1), 33–46.
  63. Spinner, M.P. (1997), Project Management: Principles and Practices, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  64. Stuckenbruck, L.C. (1981), Project Management: The Professional’s Handbook, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  65. Stuckenbruck, L.C. (1983), Project Integration in the Matrix Organization, D.I. Cleland ve W.R. King (der.), Project Management Handbook, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
  66. TC Başbakanlık (1998), Kamu-Net 98: Kamu Bilgisayar Ağları Konferansı, Ankara.
  67. Temur, N. (2009), A New Model of Public Private Partnership for e-Government Project Implementation, T.K. Bensghir (der.), eTransformation in Public Administration: From eGovernment to eGovernance, Ankara: TODAİE Presswork, 497–502.
  68. Thomsett, M.C. (1990), The Little Black Book of Project Management, New York: AMACOM.
  69. US GAO (2004), Information Technology: Foundational Steps Being Taken to Make Needed FBI Systems Modernization Management Improvements, Report to Congressional Requesters, Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office.
  70. West, J.P. ve E.M. Berman (2001), “The Impact of Revitalized Management Practices on the Adoption of Information Technology: A National Survey of Local Governments”, Public Performance and Management Review, 24(3), 233–253.
  71. Yin, R.K. (1989), Case Study Research. Design and Methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  72. Zipf, P.J. (1999), “The Essential Project Management Manual”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 15(2), 34–36.
  73. Heeks, R. (2003), “Most e-Government-for-Development Projects Fail. How Can Risks be Reduced?”, Institute for Development Policy and Management,, 26.07.2010.