KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ; ULUSLARARASI GIDA FİRMASINDA AMPİRİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE; AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN AN INTERNATIONAL FOOD COMPANY

Deniz Cebeci0009-0007-8546-0610
Abdülkadir Şencan(İSTANBUL KENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7337-6218
Sayfa
273–301
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Yiyecek içecek sektöründe hizmet veren söz konusu işletme, 9 farklı ülkede, 45 farklı milliyetten 1499 çalışan ile faaliyetlerini yürütmektedir. 529 katılımcı ile yürütülen araştırma sonucunda Hofstede ulusal kültür modeli boyutlarından yalnızca güç mesafesinin tedarik zinciri performansına anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Firmaların görevi değer zincirini tasarlarken ilk olarak tedarik zincirini tasarlamak, süreçlere entegre etmek ve yalnızca son kullanıcı için değil tüm tedarik zinciri için değer teklifleri oluşturmaktır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Performansı yüksek bir tedarik zinciri, müşterinin değer yaratmasını kolaylaştırarak tatmini ve sadakati artırır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Yiyecek içecek sektöründe hizmet veren söz konusu işletme, 9 farklı ülkede, 45 farklı milliyetten 1499 çalışan ile faaliyetlerini yürütmektedir. 529 katılımcı ile yürütülen araştırma sonucunda Hofstede ulusal kültür modeli boyutlarından yalnızca güç mesafesinin tedarik zinciri performansına anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:529 katılımcı
⚙️Değişkenler:Endüstriyel Pazarlama · Ulusal Kültür · Tedarik Zinciri Performansı

Özet

Firmaların görevi değer zincirini tasarlarken ilk olarak tedarik zincirini tasarlamak, süreçlere entegre etmek ve yalnızca son kullanıcı için değil tüm tedarik zinciri için değer teklifleri oluşturmaktır. Performansı yüksek bir tedarik zinciri, müşterinin değer yaratmasını kolaylaştırarak tatmini ve sadakati artırır. Pazarlama stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması, özellikle uluslararası tedarik zincirlerinde büyük zorluklar barındırmaktadır. Bu zorlukların başında da ulusal kültür farklılıkları gelmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı endüstriyel pazarlamada büyük önem arz eden tedarik zinciri performansının ulusal kültür tarafından ne şekilde etkilendiğinin araştırılmasıdır. Ulusal kültürün tedarik zinciri performansına etkisini incelemeyi amaçlayan bu nicel araştırma, Nedensel Tarama Modeli’nde tasarlanmış ve yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın evrenini çok uluslu bir yiyecek içecek işletmesinin çalışanları oluşturmaktadır. Yiyecek içecek sektöründe hizmet veren söz konusu işletme, 9 farklı ülkede, 45 farklı milliyetten 1499 çalışan ile faaliyetlerini yürütmektedir. 529 katılımcı ile yürütülen araştırma sonucunda Hofstede ulusal kültür modeli boyutlarından yalnızca güç mesafesinin tedarik zinciri performansına anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Bulgulardan hareketle özellikle çok uluslu şirketlerin yöneticilerine, tedarik zinciri performansını artırmak için ulusal kültür çerçevesinde neler yapabilecekleri konusunda önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Abstract

When designing the value chain, the task of companies is to first design the supply chain, integrate it into processes and create value propositions not only for the end user but for the entire supply chain. A high-performing supply chain facilitates customer value creation and increases satisfaction and loyalty. The development and implementation of marketing strategies is particularly challenging in international supply chains. One of these challenges is national cultural differences. The purpose of this study is to investigate how supply chain performance, which is of great importance in industrial marketing, is affected by national culture. This quantitative research, which aims to examine the effect of national culture on supply chain performance, was designed and conducted in the Causal Scanning Model. The population of the research consists of the employees of a multinational food and beverage organisation. The company in question, which serves in the food and beverage sector, carries out its activities in 9 different countries with 1499 employees from 45 different nationalities. As a result of the research conducted with 529 participants, it was concluded that only power distance, one of the dimensions of Hofstede national culture model, has no significant effect on supply chain performance. Based on the findings, suggestions were made to the managers of multinational companies on what they can do within the framework of national culture to increase supply chain performance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Cebeci, D., Şencan, A. (2026). ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ; ULUSLARARASI GIDA FİRMASINDA AMPİRİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 273–301. https://doi.org/10.14514/beykozad.1732434

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (88)

  1. Albuloushi, N., & Algharaballi, E. (2014). Examining the influence of the cultural aspect of uncertainty avoidance on supply chain coordination. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 30(3), 847. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v30i3.8569
  2. Anderson, J. C., Hakansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1-15.
  3. Attaran, M., & Attaran, S. (2007). Collaborative supply chain management: The most promising practice for building efficient and sustainable supply chains. Business Process Management Journal, 13(3), 390-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150710752308
  4. Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30-42.
  5. Bockstedt, J., Druehl, C., & Mishra, A. (2015). Problem-solving effort and success in innovation contests: The role of national wealth and national culture. Journal of Operations Management, 36, 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.12.002
  6. Busse, C., Schleper, M. C., Niu, M., & Wagner, S. M. (2016). Supplier development for sustainability: Contextual barriers in global supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(5), 442-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2015-0300
  7. Cannon, J. P., Doney, P. M., Mullen, M. R., & Petersen, K. J. (2010). Building long-term orientation in buyer-supplier relationships: The moderating role of culture. Journal of Operations Management, 28(6), 506-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.02.002
  8. Davis, J. M., Mora-Monge, C., Quesada, G., & Gonzalez, M. (2014). Cross-cultural influences on e-value creation in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2013-0074
  9. Doering, T., De Jong, J., & Suresh, N. (2019). Performance effects of supply chain integration: The relative impacts of two competing national culture frameworks. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1610213. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1610213
  10. Doetzer, M. (2020). The role of national culture on supply chain visibility: Lessons from Germany, Japan, and the USA. International Journal of Production Economics, 230, 107829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107829
  11. Durach, C. F., & Wiengarten, F. (2017). Exploring the impact of geographical traits on the occurrence of supply chain failures. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(2), 160-171. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2016-0380
  12. Durach, C. F., & Wiengarten, F. (2020). Supply chain integration and national collectivism. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107543
  13. Dwayne Whitten, G., Green, K. W., & Zelbst, P. J. (2012). Triple-A supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), 28-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211195727
  14. El Baz, J., Jebli, F., Cherrafi, A., Akenroye, T., & Iddik, S. (2022). The cultural dimensions in supply chain management research: A state-of-the-art review and research agenda. European Business Review, 34(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-04-2020-0092
  15. Ellinger, A. E., Keller, S. B., & Hansen, J. D. (2006). Bridging the divide between logistics and marketing: Facilitating collaborative behavior. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 1-27.
  16. Fang, T. (2001). Culture as a driving force for interfirm adaptation. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00088-7
  17. Flint, D. J. (2004). Strategic marketing in global supply chains: Four challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.009
  18. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
  19. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  20. Freeman, S., & Browne, E. (2004). The influence of national culture on dissolution communication strategies in Western versus Asian business relationships: A theoretical model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410527060
  21. Golini, R., Mazzoleni, A., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2018). National culture as an antecedent for information sharing in supply chains: A study of manufacturing companies in OECD countries. In A. C. Moreira, L. M. D. F. Ferreira, & R. A. Zimmermann (Eds.), Innovation and supply chain management: Relationship, collaboration and strategies (pp. 187-211). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74304-2_9
  22. Green, K. W., Whitten, D., & Inman, R. A. (2012). Aligning marketing strategies throughout the supply chain to enhance performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(6), 1008-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.02.003
  23. Griffith, D. A., & Myers, M. B. (2005). The performance implications of strategic fit of relational norm governance strategies in global supply chain relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400131
  24. Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3
  25. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003
  26. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  27. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  28. Hair, J. F., Ortinau, D. J., & Harrison, D. E. (2024). Essentials of marketing research (6th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
  29. Han, W., Huang, Y., & Macbeth, D. (2018). Performance measurement of cross-culture supply chain partnership: A case study in the Chinese automotive industry. International Journal of Production Research, 56(7), 2437-2451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1377357
  30. Hashemi Joo, M., Nishikawa, Y., Dandapani, K., & Jayaraman, V. (2025). Unlocking the role of language and national culture: Effects on supply chain operations in a global context. Production and Operations Management, 34(5), 929-948. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241254853
  31. He, J., & Sun, L. (2020). Does continuity matter? Developing a new long-term orientation structure in a cross-cultural context: A study on supply chain relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.003
  32. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
  33. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. SAGE.
  34. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  35. Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long-versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493-504.
  36. Hsu, P.-F., & Nguyen, T. (2023). Examining the cultural differences in disseminating green supply chain in global subsidiaries. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113982
  37. Huang, S. S., & Crotts, J. (2019). Relationships between Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and tourist satisfaction: A cross-country cross-sample examination. Tourism Management, 72, 232-241.
  38. Huo, B., Ye, Y., Zhao, X., & Shou, Y. (2016). The impact of human capital on supply chain integration and competitive performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 178, 132-143.
  39. Hwang, J., Chung, J.-E., & Jin, B. (2013). Culture matters: The role of long-term orientation and market orientation in buyer-supplier relationships in a Confucian culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25(5), 721-744. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-10-2012-0107
  40. Jahoda, G. (2012). Critical reflections on some recent definitions of “culture”. Culture & Psychology, 18(3), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12446229
  41. Jarratt, D., & Fayed, R. (2001). The impact of market and organisational challenges on marketing strategy decision-making: A qualitative investigation of the business-to-business sector. Journal of Business Research, 51(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00040-5
  42. Jüttner, U., Christopher, M., & Baker, S. (2007). Demand chain management-integrating marketing and supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.003
  43. Kaipia, R., & Hartiala, H. (2006). Information-sharing in supply chains: Five proposals on how to proceed. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 17(3), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090610717536
  44. Karasar, N. (2022). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (37. baskı). Nobel.
  45. Kenny, K. E., Kauppi, K., & Matinheikki, J. (2025). Sustainable supply chain decisions – (when) does gender matter? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2024-0754
  46. Kesavan, D. P., & Deif, A. M. (2021). Exploring national culture impact on logistics performance. Transportation Journal, 60(1), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.60.1.0020
  47. Kull, T. J., & Wacker, J. G. (2010). Quality management effectiveness in Asia: The influence of culture. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.003
  48. Kull, T. J., Yan, T., Liu, Z., & Wacker, J. G. (2014). The moderation of lean manufacturing effectiveness by dimensions of national culture: Testing practice-culture congruence hypotheses. International Journal of Production Economics, 153, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.03.015
  49. Kumar, S., Liu, J., & Demirag, O. C. (2016). National culture’s impact on effectiveness of supply chain disruption management. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 17(4), 11-29.
  50. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00113-3
  51. Lee, G., Shin, G., Hwang, D. W., Kuper, P., & Kang, M. (2018). How manufacturers’ long-term orientation toward suppliers influences outsourcing performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 74, 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.003
  52. Lee, H., Kim, M. S., & Kim, K. K. (2014). Interorganizational information systems visibility and supply chain performance. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.10.003
  53. Litvin, S. W., Crotts, J. C., & Hefner, F. L. (2004). Cross-cultural tourist behaviour: A replication and extension involving Hofstede’s uncertainty avoidance dimension. International Journal of Tourism Research, 6(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.468
  54. Liu, S., Tan, J., Mao, H., & Gong, Y. (2021). Does national culture matter? Understanding the impact of supply chain integration in multiple countries. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(5), 610-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2020-0099
  55. Maletzke, G. (2013). Interkulturelle Kommunikation: Zur Interaktion zwischen Menschen verschiedener Kulturen. Springer-Verlag.
  56. Marin-Garcia, J. A., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Medina-López, C. (2013). Supply chain integration scales validation and benchmark values. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(2), 423-440.
  57. McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith-a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89-118.
  58. Michel, S., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Reconfiguration of the conceptual landscape: A tribute to the service logic of Richard Normann. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 152-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0067-8
  59. Murphy, W. H., Gölgeci, I., & Johnston, D. A. (2019). Power-based behaviors between supply chain partners of diverse national and organizational cultures: The crucial role of boundary spanners’ cultural intelligence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(2), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2018-0179
  60. Naor, M., Linderman, K., & Schroeder, R. (2010). The globalization of operations in Eastern and Western countries: Unpacking the relationship between national and organizational culture and its impact on manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.001
  61. Nardon, L., & Steers, R. M. (2009). The culture theory jungle: Divergence and convergence in models of national culture. In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work (pp. 3-22). Cambridge University Press.
  62. O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
  63. Osei, M. B., Papadopoulos, T., Acquaye, A., & Stamati, T. (2023). Improving sustainable supply chain performance through organisational culture: A competing values framework approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 29(2), 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2023.100821
  64. Pagell, M., Katz, J. P., & Sheu, C. (2005). The importance of national culture in operations management research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(4), 371-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510585552
  65. Papert, M., Rimpler, P., & Pflaum, A. (2016). Enhancing supply chain visibility in a pharmaceutical supply chain: Solutions based on automatic identification technology. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(9), 859-884. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2016-0151
  66. Park, C. L., & Paiva, E. L. (2018). How do national cultures impact the operations strategy process? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(10), 1937-1963. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2017-0145
  67. Qu, W. G., & Yang, Z. (2015). The effect of uncertainty avoidance and social trust on supply chain collaboration. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 911-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.017
  68. Rahman, M., Khan, T., Emon, M., Bukari, Z., & Nath, A. (2024). The new marketing paradigm: From traditional to digital.
  69. Rosenzweig, E. D., Roth, A. V., & Dean, J. W. (2003). The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00037-8
  70. Ryu, S., Lee, E., & Jun Lee, W. (2011). A cross-cultural study of interfirm power structure and commitment: The effect of collectivism. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(2), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621111112276
  71. Sanders, N. R. (2008). Pattern of information technology use: The impact on buyer-supplier coordination and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 349-367.
  72. Sargut, A. S. (2010). Kültürler arası farklılaşma ve yönetim. İmge Kitabevi.
  73. Saylık, A. (2019). Hofstede’nin kültür boyutları ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 8(3), 1860-1881.
  74. Shi, X., & Wang, J. (2011). Interpreting Hofstede model and GLOBE model: Which way to go for cross-cultural research? International Journal of Business and Management, 6(5), 93. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n5p93
  75. Sousa, A., Rodrigues, C. M. S., Teixeira, S. F. C., & Besson, D. (2021, September). Influence of national culture in supply chain internal integration. The 16th International Symposium on Operations Research in Slovenia, Slovenia.
  76. Stewart, G. (1995). Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence. Logistics Information Management, 8(2), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576059510085000
  77. Swaminathan, J. M., & Tayur, S. R. (2003). Models for supply chains in e-business. Management Science, 49(10), 1387-1406. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1387.17309
  78. Tuan, L. T. (2016). From cultural intelligence to supply chain performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(1), 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2014-0009
  79. Van der Vaart, T., Pieter van Donk, D., Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2012). Modelling the integration-performance relationship: Collaborative practices, enablers and contextual factors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(9), 1043-1074.
  80. Venaik, S., & Brewer, P. (2010). Avoiding uncertainty in Hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1294-1315. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.96
  81. Wiengarten, F., Gimenez, C., Fynes, B., & Ferdows, K. (2015). Exploring the importance of cultural collectivism on the efficacy of lean practices: Taking an organisational and national perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(3), 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2012-0357
  82. Wong, C. W. Y., Sancha, C., & Thomsen, C. G. (2017). A national culture perspective in the efficacy of supply chain integration practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 554-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.015
  83. Yang, Z. B., Aydın, G., Babich, V., & Beil, D. R. (2009). Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Science, 55(2), 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0943
  84. Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3-4), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.578059
  85. Zamora, E. A. (2016). Value chain analysis: A brief review. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 5(2), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.7545/AJIP.2016.5.2.116
  86. Zanon, L. G., Sigahi, T. F. A. C., Anholon, R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2024). Organizational culture’s influence on supply chain performance analysis with fuzzy grey cognitive maps. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 14(4), 733-753. https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-10-2023-0099
  87. Zelbst, P. J., Green, K. W., Sower, V. E., & Baker, G. (2010). RFID utilization and information sharing: The impact on supply chain performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(8), 582-589. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621011088310
  88. Zhao, X., Flynn, B. B., & Roth, A. V. (2006). Decision sciences research in China: A critical review and research agenda—foundations and overview. Decision Sciences, 37(4), 451-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00135.x