| Transformation of perception of the gecekondu phenomenon | MEHMET RIFAT AKBULUT,SEHER BAŞLIK | 1–44 |
| Birinci ulusal mimarlık dönemi İzmir konutu: Yerellik ve melezlik | ŞENİZ ÇIKIŞ | 45–61 |
| A review of byzantine studies and architectural historiography in Turkey today (1) | Şule YILDIZ KILIÇ | 63–80 |
| Defining the urban environment of Aydın in the 20th century through the memoirs of Zeki Mesud Alsan | GÖKÇE ŞİMŞEK | 81–103 |
| An integrated approach to conservation based on the interrelations of tangible and intangible cultural properties | ÖZLEM KARAKUL TÜRK | 105–125 |
| Macro implications of households’ reivestment behaviour in existing housing stock | Ö Burcu SARI ÖZDEMİR | 127–143 |
| Questioning an “icon of change”: The Nuruosmaniye complex and the writing of Ottoman architectural history | Selva SUMAN | 145–166 |
| The new architectural classicism in Northern Cyprus | Marko KIESSEL,Devrim BESİM YÜCEL,Asu TOZAN | 167–180 |
| Conceptual challenges between universal design and disability in relation to the body, impairment, and the environment. Where does the issue of disability stand in the philosophy of ud? | Mualla ERKILIÇ | 181–203 |
| Towards hands-on computing in design: An analysis of the haptic dimension of model making | Çağrı Hakan ZAMAN,MİNE ÖZKAR KABAKÇIOĞLU,GÜLEN ÇAĞDAŞ | 209–226 |
| Experiences wıth moodle as a communication tool for design teamwork: A users’ perspective | ŞULE TAŞLI PEKTAŞ,HALİME DEMİRKAN | 227–241 |
| Sayısal ortamda, tasarımın deneyimlenmesi için arayüzlerin geliştirilmesi: Bir ön-tasarım parametresi olarak ses | ÇAĞLAR FIRAT ÖZGENEL,Arzu SORGUÇ GÖNEN | 243–253 |
| İşbirlikli mimari tasarım eğitiminde sanal dünya kullanımı | LEMAN FİGEN GÜL | 255–267 |
| Hesaplamalı modeller aracılığıyla mimari ve doğal biçim türetim ilkelerini ilişkilendirmek | Elif ERDOĞAN,Arzu SORGUÇ GÖNEN | 269–281 |