SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Forest Science / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT OF BIOPHILIC DESIGN

BİYOFİLİK TASARIMIN AKADEMİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Ali Osman Özğan(ığdır Üniversitesi)0000-0001-9646-1984
İclal Aluçlu(DİCLE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8151-2811
Pages
267–283
Publication Date
2023-10-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, a collaboration network formed by studies conducted through inter-researcher cooperation is generated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biophilic design proposes the use of natural environment, plants and green areas, organic forms and natural materials for people's healthy and peaceful life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The distribution of academic publications on biophilic design by years, the average age of articles and the annual growth rate will be investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, a collaboration network formed by studies conducted through inter-researcher cooperation is generated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Biyofilik tasarım · bibliyometrik analiz · mimarlık

Abstract

Biophilic design proposes the use of natural environment, plants and green areas, organic forms and natural materials for people's healthy and peaceful life. It is aimed to determine the contribution of countries to academic studies on biophilic design and what is the cooperation between countries and the research and cooperation potentials of countries on this subject. The distribution of academic publications on biophilic design by years, the average age of articles and the annual growth rate will be investigated. In order to find answers to these questions, articles on biophilic design were analyzed using bibliometric analysis method. The Web of Science database, which is widely used in academic studies, was selected for bibliometric analysis. With the bibliometric analysis method, the geographical distribution of academic research on biophilic design, the prominent countries in this field, the level of interest worldwide and the tendency of diffusion are analyzed. 346 articles on biophilic design published in 184 journals between 2006 and 2023 in Web of Science were evaluated. As a result of the analysis, it is seen that the annual growth rate in the number of academic publications on biophilic design is 24.41%. The average age of articles on biophilic design was found to be 3.57 years. The subject of biophilic design has shown an increasing interest over the years among academic circles and researchers; this emphasizes the current relevance of the topic. According to the number of academic studies published on the subject of biophilic design, the countries ranked from large to small according to the number of academic studies on biophilic design are America, Australia, England, Canada, China, Italy, Korea, Portugal, Egypt, Poland, Turkey, Sweden, Spain, Belgium, Germany, Iran, Japan, Lithuania, India and other countries. When the research on biophilic design published in 42 countries is evaluated, Turkey ranks 11th with 8 articles. Furthermore, a collaboration network formed by studies conducted through inter-researcher cooperation is generated.

Özet

Biyofilik tasarım, insanların sağlıklı ve huzurlu yaşamı için doğal çevreyi, bitki ve yeşil alanların kullanımını, organik formların ve doğal malzemelerin tercihini önermektedir. Biyofilik tasarım hakkında yapılan akademik çalışmalara ülkelerin katkısı ve ülkeler arası işbirliği nedir soruları ile bu konu hakkında ülkelerin araştırma ve işbirliği potansiyelleri belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Biyofilik tasarımla ilgili yapılan akademik yayınların yıllara göre dağılımı, makale ortalama yaşı ve yıllık büyüme oranı nedir sorusu ile konunun güncelliği araştırılacaktır. Bu sorulara cevap bulmak için biyofilik tasarım konusunda yapılan makaleler bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak incelenmektedir. Bibliyometrik analiz için akademik çalışmalarda yaygın olarak kullanılan Web of Science veri tabanı seçilmiştir. Bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile biyofilik tasarımı içeren akademik araştırmaların coğrafi dağılımı, bu alanda öne çıkan ülkeleri, dünya genelindeki ilgi düzeyini ve yayılma eğilimi analiz edilmektedir. Biyofilik tasarım konusunda Web of Science’de taranan 2006-2023 yılları arasında 184 dergide yayınlanan 346 makale değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda biyofilik tasarımla ilgili akademik yayın sayısında yıllık büyüme oranının % 24.41olduğu görülmektedir. Biyofilik tasarım konusunda makale ortalama yaşı 3.57 olarak bulunmuştur. Biyofilik tasarım konusu, akademik çevrelerde ve araştırmacılar arasında yıllara göre artan bir ilgi göstermektedir; bu durum, konunun günümüzdeki önemini vurgulamaktadır. Biyofilik tasarım konusunda yayınlanan akademik çalışma sayısına göre büyükten küçüğe Amerika, Avustralya, İngiltere, Kanada, Çin, İtalya, Kore, Portekiz, Mısır, Polonya, Türkiye, İsveç, İspanya, Belçika, Almanya, İran, Japonya, Litvanya, Hindistan ve diğer ülkeler şeklinde sıralanmaktadır. Biyofilik tasarım konusunda 42 ülke içerisinde yayınlanan araştırmalar değerlendirildiğinde Türkiye 8 makale ile 11. sırada yer almaktadır. Ayrıca, araştırmacılar arası işbirliği ile gerçekleştirilen çalışmaların oluşturduğu işbirliği ağı üretilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özğan, A. O., Aluçlu, İ. (2023). ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT OF BIOPHILIC DESIGN. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.1347473

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Africa, J., Heerwagen, J., Loftness, V., & Ryan Balagtas, C. (2019). Biophilic design and climate change: Performance parameters for health. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5, 434550. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00028/Bibtex
  2. Akyıldız, A. K. (2023). Biyofilik Tasarım Konulu Lisansüstü Tezlerin Bibliyometrik Analizi. Kent Akademisi, 16(2), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.35674/Kent.1137707
  3. Alipour, L., & Khoramian, M. (2023). Investigating the impact of biophilic design on employee performance and well-being by designing a research instrument. Kybernetes, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2022-1134/full/pdf
  4. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  5. Batistič, S., & van der Laken, P. (2019). History, Evolution and Future of Big Data and Analytics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Its Relationship to Performance in Organizations. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12340
  6. Beatley, T. (2016). Handbook of Biophilic City Planning & Design. Island Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=wnmIDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Biophilic+design+conservation+of+natural+areas+in+cities&ots=fXnLVIxpqU&sig=YUMMG2pph_Cr70U0_52lieWiI0k&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Biophilic%20design%20conservation%20of%20natural%20areas%20in%20cities&f=false
  7. Bowler, D., Knight, L., & Pullin A. (2010). The Importance Of Nature For Health: is There A Specific Benefit Of Contact With Green Space? Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Library CEE review 08-003 Systematic Review. www.environmentalevidence.org/SR40.html.
  8. Büyükkıdık, S. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis: A Tutorial for the Bibliometrix Package in R Using IRT Literature. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 13(3), 164–193. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1069307
  9. Çavdar, E. (2021). Yeşil Lojistik: WoS Verilerine Dayalı Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz (2000-2021). Econder International Academic Journal, 5(2), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.35342/econder.1006218
  10. Chen, Y., Xiong, K., Ren, X., & Cheng, C. (2022). An overview of ecological vulnerability: a bibliometric analysis based on the Web of Science database. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 12984–12996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17995-1
  11. Dalay, L., & Aytaç, G. (2022). Biophilic Design: Integrating Nature Into the Urban Environment. In Emerging Approaches in Design and New Connections With Nature (pp. 1-19). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6725-8.ch001
  12. Dao, L. T., Tran, T., Van Le, H., Nguyen, G. N., & Trinh, T. P. T. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of Research on Education 4.0 during the 2017–2021 period. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2437–2453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11211-4
  13. DeLauer, V., McGill-O’Rourke, A., Hayes, T., Haluch, A., Gordon, C., Crane, J., Kossakowski, D., Dillon, C., Thibeault, N., & Schofield, D. (2022). The impact of natural environments and biophilic design as supportive and nurturing spaces on a residential college campus. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.2000570
  14. Derviş, H. (2020). Bibliometric Analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
  15. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-015-1645-Z/Tables/9
  16. Farrukh, M., Meng, F., Raza, A., & Tahir, M. S. (2020). Twenty-seven years of Sustainable Development Journal: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1725–1737. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.2120
  17. Fisher, B. S., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear of Crime in Relation to Three Exterior Site Features. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0013916592241002, 24(1), 35–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916592241002
  18. Girginkaya Akdağ, S. (2021). Biyofilik Tasarım ve Teknoloji Arakesitinde: Yeni Alışveriş Mekan ve Deneyimleri. Kent Akademisi, 14(4), 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.35674/Kent.982905
  19. Guleria, D., & Kaur, G. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989–2019. Library Hi Tech, 39(4), 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2020-0218
  20. Gür, M., & Kaprol, T. (1 C.E.). The Participation of Biophilic Design in the Design of the Post-Pandemic Living Space. Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/978-1-7998-6725-8.Ch004, 75–106. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6725-8.CH004
  21. Güngör, B. Ş. (2020). Do Green Building Standards Meet the Biophilic Design Strategies?. Journal of Design Studio, 2(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.739849
  22. Hähn, N., Essah, E., & Blanusa, T. (2021). Biophilic design and office planting: a case study of effects on perceived health, well-being and performance metrics in the workplace. Intelligent Building International, 13(4), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2020.1732859
  23. Jabbarioun Moghaddami, H. (2019). Re-thinking biophilic design patterns in preschool environments for children (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University). https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/45239
  24. Kellert, S. (2012). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. https://books.google.com/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=C_5_IZjwup8C&oi=fnd&pg=PP7&ots=tmKhRbjs6M&sig=0DMUKS61XH_vBJIzLoBATRsSfRw
  25. Lee, H. C., & Park, S. J. (2018). Assessment of Importance and Characteristics of Biophilic Design Patterns in a Children’s Library. Sustainability 2018, Vol. 10, Page 987, 10(4), 987. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10040987
  26. Ma, D., Yang, B., Guan, B., Song, L., Liu, Q., Fan, Y., Zhao, L., Wang, T., Zhang, Z., Gao, Z., Li, S., & Xu, H. (2021). A Bibliometric Analysis of Pyroptosis From 2001 to 2021. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, 731933. https://doi.org/10.3389/FIMMU.2021.731933/BIBTEX
  27. Nalcı, M. M., & Nalcı Arıbaş, N. (2023). Yerel Yönetim Ve Pazarlama Konularının Birlikte Çalışıldığı Yayınların Bibliyometrik Analizi. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 14(1), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1241136
  28. Nyrud, A. Q., Bringslimark, T., & Bysheim, K. (2013). Benefits from wood interior in a hospital room: a preference study. Architectural Science Review, 57(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2013.816933
  29. Ogutu, H., El Archi, Y., & Dénes Dávid, L. (2023). Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 11–45. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.001
  30. Oğuz, G. P., Özyılmaz, H., & Dağtekin, E. (2008). Dicle Üniversitesinde Mimarlık Eğitimi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 1–13. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uumfd/issue/21679/233329
  31. Ökten, S. S. Ö. (2022). Kent Parklarının Biyofilik Tasarım Kriterlerine Göre Yenilenmesi: İskenderun Millet Parkı Örneği. Kent Akademisi, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.35674/Kent.984157
  32. Özğan, A. O., & Aluçlu, İ. (2023). Doğayla Uyumlu Mekânlar: Biyofilik Tasarımın Bibliyometrik Değerlendirmesi. İdealkent, 15(41), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1350785
  33. Özil, M. E., & Aykal, D. (2021). Biyofilik Tasarımın Diyarbakır Geleneksel Konutlarında Araştırılması. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 6(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.801022
  34. Panagopoulos, T., Sbarcea, M., & Herman, K. (2020). A biophilic mind-set for a restorative built environment. Scientific Journal of Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies Landscape Architecture and Art, 17, 17. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2020.17.08
  35. Patra, S. K., Bhattacharya, P., & Verma, N. (2006). Bibliometric Study of Literature on Bibliometrics. Desidoc Bulletin of Information Technology, 26(1), 27–32.
  36. Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033
  37. Russo, A., & Andreucci, M. B. (2023). Raising Healthy Children: Promoting the Multiple Benefits of Green Open Spaces through Biophilic Design. Sustainability 2023, Vol. 15, Page 1982, 15(3), 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15031982
  38. Sal Moslehian, A., Roös, P. B., Gaekwad, J. S., & Van Galen, L. (2023). Potential risks and beneficial impacts of using indoor plants in the biophilic design of healthcare facilities: A scoping review. Building and Environment, 233, 110057. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2023.110057
  39. Sayed, A., & Nagy, G. (2020). Design Strategies for Integrating Biophilic Design to Enhance the Students’ Performance in Existing Primary Schools in Egypt. Fayoum University Journal of Engineering, 3(2), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.21608/FUJE.2020.204935
  40. Sinemillioglu, M. O., Akin, C. T., & Karacay, N. (2010). Relationship Between Green Areas and Urban Conservation in Historical Areas and Its Reflections: Case of Diyarbakir City, Turkey. European Planning Studies, 18(5), 775–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003612620
  41. Söderlund, J., & Newman, P. (2017). Improving Mental Health in Prisons Through Biophilic Design. Prison Journal, 97(6), 750–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517734516/asset/ımages/large/10.1177_0032885517734516-fıg2.jpeg
  42. Xue, F., Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., Lau, S. K., Chung, K. H., & Zhang, J. (2019). From biophilic design to biophilic urbanism: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1444-1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.277 Wilson, E. O. (2018). Biophilia and the Conservation Ethic. Evolutionary Perspectives on Environmental Problems, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792650-18/biophilia-conservation-ethic-edward-wilson
  43. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007