SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Development and Testing of Stress and Stressors Scale of Risky Pregnant Women in the Hospital

Hastanedeki Riskli Gebe Kadınlar İçin Stres ve Stresörler Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi ve Test Edilmesi

Samiye METE
Hülya ÖZBERK
Elif ULUDAĞ
Pages
65–77
Publication Date
2023-08-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The scale can be used to determine hospital-related stress and stressors for all at-risky pregnant women and to contribute to planning of interventions for women' stress.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to development and testing a scale to determine hospital-related stress and stressors that can be applied for risky pregnant women in all three trimesters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was conducted from in the perinatology clinics of two training and research hospitals, between September 2019- December 2020 with 200 risky pregnant women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The scale can be used to determine hospital-related stress and stressors for all at-risky pregnant women and to contribute to planning of interventions for women' stress.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:riskli gebelik · stres · stresör

Abstract

The aim of the study is to development and testing a scale to determine hospital-related stress and stressors that can be applied for risky pregnant women in all three trimesters. This is a methodological study. It was conducted from in the perinatology clinics of two training and research hospitals, between September 2019- December 2020 with 200 risky pregnant women. The data were collected with a sociodemographic form and the Stress and Stressors Scale of Risky Pregnant Women in Hospital. The construct validity of the scale was determined via exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The scale consists of 20 items and five subdimensions. Cronbach’s alpha value is 0.87 for total scales. This value study showed that the scale is a valid and reliable. The scale can be used to determine hospital-related stress and stressors for all at-risky pregnant women and to contribute to planning of interventions for women' stress.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı, her üç trimesterdeki riskli gebeler için uygulanabilecek hastane ile ilgili stres ve stresörleri belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Bu metodolojik çalışma, Eylül 2019-Aralık 2020 tarihleri arasında iki eğitim ve araştırma hastanesinin perinatoloji kliniklerinde 200 adet riskli gebe ile yürütülmüştür. Veriler sosyodemografik form ve Hastanedeki Riskli Gebelerin Stres ve Stresörleri Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği açıklayıcı faktör analizi ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile belirlenmiştir. Ölçek, 20 madde ve beş alt boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin toplamı için Cronbach's alfa değeri 0.87'dir. Bu çalışma, ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğunu göstermiştir. Ölçek, tüm riskli gebe kadınlar için hastane ile ilgili stres ve stresörleri belirlemek ve kadınların stresine yönelik müdahalelerin planlanmasına katkıda bulunmak için kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

METE, S., ÖZBERK, H., ULUDAĞ, E. (2023). Development and Testing of Stress and Stressors Scale of Risky Pregnant Women in the Hospital. Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 65–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/957663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2015). Screening for perinatal depression. Retrieved from http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/Screening-for-Perinatal-Depression on 4 September 2022.
  2. Avramova, N. (2020). Theoretical aspects of stress: A review article. Journal of Medical and Dental Science Research, 7(8), 11-7.
  3. Çapık, A., & Pasinlioğlu, T. (2015). Validity and reliability study of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale into Turkish. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(4), 260-9. doi:10.1111/jpm.12211 Ekolu, S.O., & Quainoo, H. (2019). Reliability of assessments in engineering education using Cronbach’s alpha, KR and split-half methods. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 24-29.
  4. Elma, C. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions on school administrators’ spiteful behaviours. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 83, 57-80. doi:10.14689/ejer.2019.83.3 Elvander, C., Cnattingius, S., & Kjerulff, K.H. (2013). Birth experience in women with low, intermediate or high levels of fear: Findings from the first baby study. Birth, 40(4), 289-96. doi: 10.1111/birt.12065.
  5. Gourounti, K., Karpathitaki, N., & Vaslamatzis, G. (2015). Psychosocial stress in high riskhigh-risk pregnancy. International Archives of Medicine, 8(95), 1-9 doi: 10.3823/1694. Hayran, M., & Hayran, M. (2011). Basic statistics for health research. Art Ofset Publishing Organization. Holness, N. (2018). High-Risk pregnancy. Nursing Clinics of North America, 53(2), 241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2018.01.010 Janighorban, M., Heidari, Z., Dadkhah, A., & Mohammadi, F. (2018). Women's needs on bed rest during high-risk pregnancy and postpartum period: A qualitative study. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, 6(3), 1327-1335. doi:10.22038/JMRH.2018.28162.1304 Kalaycı, S. (2010). SPSS Applied multivariate statistical techniques. Asil Publishing. Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. (2019). One size doesn't fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE: Life Sciences Education, 18(1), 1–17. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064
  6. Koyuncu, I., & Kılıc, A.F. (2019). The use of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses: A document analysis. Education and Science, 44(198), 361-388.
  7. Lu, S., Wei, F., & Li, G. (2021). The evolution of the concept of stress and the framework of the stress system. Cell Stress, 5(6), 76. Oliveira, D.C., & Mandu, E.N.T. (2015). Women with h